Prophylactic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer at the time of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Most serous ovarian cancers are now understood to originate in the fallopian tubes. Removing the tubes (salpingectomy) likely reduces the risk of developing high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Numerous gynaecological societies now recommend prophylactic (or opportunistic) salpingectomy at the time of gynaecological surgery in appropriate women, and this is widely done. Salpingectomy at the time of non-gynaecological surgery has not been explored and may present an opportunity for primary prevention of ovarian cancer. METHODS: This study investigated whether prophylactic salpingectomy with the intention of reducing the risk of developing ovarian cancer would be accepted and could be accomplished at the time of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Women aged at least 45 years scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were recruited. They were counselled and offered prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cholecystectomy. Outcome measures were rate of accomplishment of salpingectomy, time and procedural steps needed for salpingectomy, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were included in the study. The rate of acceptance of salpingectomy was approximately 60 per cent. Salpingectomy was performed in 98 of 105 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (93·3 per cent) and not accomplished because of poor visibility or adhesions in seven (6·7 per cent). Median additional operating time was 13 (range 4-45) min. There were no complications attributable to salpingectomy. One patient presented with ovarian cancer 28 months after prophylactic salpingectomy; histological re-evaluation of the tubes showed a previously undetected, focal serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic salpingectomy can be done during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

ANTECEDENTES: La mayoría de carcinomas serosos de ovario se originan en las trompas de Falopio. La exéresis de las trompas (salpingectomía) probablemente reduce el riesgo de desarrollar un carcinoma seroso ovárico de alto grado. Numerosas sociedades ginecológicas recomiendan efectuar una salpingectomía profiláctica (u oportunista) en el momento de una cirugía ginecológica en determinadas mujeres, y esta conducta está ampliamente difundida. Sin embargo, no se ha analizado la realización de la salpingectomía durante cirugías no ginecológicas como forma de prevención primaria del carcinoma ovárico. MÉTODOS: Determinar si la salpingectomía profiláctica con intención de reducir el riesgo de desarrollar cáncer de ovario sería aceptada y podría llevarse a cabo durante una colecistectomía laparoscópica electiva. Se reclutaron mujeres ≥ 45 años de edad programadas para colecistectomía laparoscópica electiva. A todas ellas se les aconsejó y ofreció la realización de una salpingectomía bilateral profiláctica en el momento de su colecistectomía. Las variables analizadas fueron la tasa de realización de la salpingectomía, la duración y las etapas quirúrgicos para efectuar este procedimiento, y las complicaciones. RESULTADOS: La aceptación de la salpingectomía fue aproximadamente del 60%. La salpingectomía se realizó en 98 de 105 colecistectomías laparoscópicas (93%) y no se pudo realizar en 7 pacientes (7%) por escasa visibilidad o adherencias. La mediana del tiempo quirúrgico adicional fue de 13 (rango 4-45) minutos. No hubo complicaciones atribuibles a la salpingectomía. Una paciente presentó cáncer de ovario 28 meses después de la salpingectomía profiláctica; la reevaluación histológica de las trompas mostró un carcinoma intraepitelial seroso focal tubárico (serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, STIC) no detectado previamente. CONCLUSIÓN: La salpingectomía profiláctica se puede realizar durante la colecistectomía laparoscópica electiva.

Incidental (Prophylactic) Salpingectomy at Benign Gynecologic Surgery and Cesarean Section: a Survey of Practice in Austria.

Introduction: Most serous ovarian cancers are now thought to originate in the fallopian tubes. This has raised the issue of performing incidental salpingectomy (also called elective, opportunistic, prophylactic or risk-reducing salpingectomy) at the time of benign gynecologic surgery or cesarean section. We conducted an online survey to ascertain the policies regarding incidental salpingectomy in Austria in late 2014. Material and Methods: All 75 departments of obstetrics and gynecology in public hospitals in Austria were surveyed for their policies regarding incidental salpingectomy at benign gynecologic surgery or cesarean section. Results: Sixty-six of 75 surveyed departments completed the questionnaire, resulting in a response rate of 88 %. Overall, 46 of 66 (70 %) units reported offering or recommending incidental salpingectomy at benign gynecologic surgery, 12 units (18 %) did not, and eight units (12 %) did not have a consistent policy. Salpingectomy was the preferred method for surgical sterilization, including sterilization at the time of cesarean section (71 % and 64 % of units, respectively). Conclusions: Incidental (elective, opportunistic, prophylactic, risk-reducing) salpingectomy is now widely offered at benign gynecologic surgery and cesarean section in Austria. Evidence for the role of the fallopian tubes in the origin of serous pelvic cancer has led to changes in clinical practice.

The surgical anatomy and etiology of gastrointestinal fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Fistulas are abnormal communications between two epithelial surfaces, either between two portions of the intestine, between the intestine and some other hollow viscus, or between the intestine and the skin of the abdominal wall. The etiology of intestinal fistulas is in most cases a result of multiple contributing factors. Despite significant advances in their management over the past decades, intestinal fistulas remain a major clinical problem, with a high overall mortality rate of up to 30% due to the high rate of complications. This paper aims to describe classification systems based on the anatomy, physiology and etiology that may be helpful in the clinical management of intestinal fistulas. METHODS: On the basis of anatomical differences, fistulas can be classified based by the site of origin, by site of their openings, or as simple or complex. Physiologic classification as low, moderate or high output fistulas is most useful for the non-surgical approach. Concerning the etiology, we classified the possible causes as (postoperative) trauma, inflammation, infection, malignancy, radiation injury or congenital. CONCLUSION: Fistula formation can cause a number of serious or debilitating complications ranging from disturbance of fluid and electrolyte balance to sepsis and even death. They still remain an important complication following gastrointestinal surgery.