Pharmacodynamics of inhaled amikacin (BAY 41-6551) studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Background: The pharmacodynamics of inhaled antimicrobials are poorly studied. Amikacin is being developed for inhalational therapy as BAY 41-6551. Objectives: We employed an in vitro pharmacokinetic model to study the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of amikacin. Methods: A dose-ranging design was used to establish fAUC/MIC and fCmax/MIC targets for static, -1 log drop and -2 log drop effects for strains of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We then modelled epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentration associated with inhaled amikacin (400 mg every 12 h), over 5 days using mean human concentrations. Results: The 24 h static effect fAUC/MIC targets and -1 log drop targets were 51.0 ±âŸ26.7 and 71.6 ±âŸ27.6 for all species of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli. fAUC/MIC targets for static effect, -1 log drop or -2 log drop were smaller than the 24 h values at 12 h and larger at 48 h. Emergence of resistance occurred maximally with E. coli in the fAUC/MIC range 12-60; K. pneumoniae 0-60 (48 h) and P. aeruginosa 12-80. When human ELF concentrations were modelled for strains with MIC ≤8 mg/L, there was rapid clearance and no regrowth. For strains with MIC ≥32 mg/L, there was initial clearance followed by regrowth. If MIC values were related to bacterial clearance then at least a static effect or -1 log drop in count would be expected for bacterial strains with MICs of ≤180 mg/L (static effect) or ≤148 mg/L (-1 log drop effect). Conclusions: An fAUC/MIC amikacin target of 50-80 is appropriate for aerobic Gram-negative bacilli and mean ELF concentrations of BAY 41-6551 would produce a static to -1 log clearance with strains up to 128 mg/L.

The pharmacodynamics of avibactam in combination with ceftaroline or ceftazidime against ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae studied in an in vitro model of infection.

Objectives: Pharmacodynamics of ß-lactamase inhibitors are an area of intense interest as new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations enter clinical development and clinical practice. Avibactam, a non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor, has been combined with ceftaroline or ceftazidime but these two combinations have not been directly compared. Methods: Using an in vitro pharmacokinetic model we simulated human drug concentration-time courses associated with ceftaroline 600 mg every 8 h and ceftazidime 2000 mg every 8 h. Avibactam was given by continuous infusion at a range of concentrations up to 10 mg/L and antibacterial effect assessed against a CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli , AmpC-hyperproducing Enterobacter cloacae and KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Simulations were performed over 72 h. Results: Avibactam, at a concentration of 1-2 mg/L, produced maximum bacterial clearance over 72 h for the E. coli and E. cloacae strains with both ceftaroline and ceftazidime. Avibactam (4 mg/L) was required for maximum reduction in bacterial load with the KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. A series of dose fractionation experiments were performed with avibactam against each of the three strains and AUC, C max or T > avibactam concentration of 1, 2 or 4 mg/L related to antibacterial effect as measured by change in bacterial count at 24 h. AUC or C max were best related to 24 h antibacterial effect for avibactam though there was no consistent pattern favouring one over the other. Conclusions: As AUC is a much easier and more reliable pharmacokinetic measure than C max , it would be useful to explore how AUC-based indices for avibactam exposures could be used for translating the results of the present study into patients' therapy.

Differences in the pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline against different species of Enterobacteriaceae studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

OBJECTIVES: Dose-ranging experiments were performed to study the pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline against Enterobacteriaceae. METHODS: A range of fT>MIC values (0%-100%) were simulated over 96 h using a single-compartment dilutional in vitro pharmacokinetic model using Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Citrobacter koseri and Serratia marcescens (n = 16). Antibacterial effect was assessed by change in viable count and population profiles by growth on ceftaroline MIC ×2, ×4 and ×8 agar plates. The fT>MIC (%) was related to antibacterial effect using a sigmoid Emax model. RESULTS: The 24 h bacteriostatic effect fT>MIC was 39.7% ±â€Š15.7% and 43.2% ±â€Š15.6% for a -1 log drop for all strains. E. coli required lower exposures than K. pneumoniae, i.e. 24 h fT>MIC for a -3 log drop in viable count was 40.0% ±â€Š9.6% and 84.8% ±â€Š15.2% for K. pneumoniae. Similarly at 96 h, fT>MIC was >100% for K. pneumoniae (for four of five strains), 27.2%-66.2% for E. coli and 16.2%-86.6% for P. mirabilis. Strain-to-strain variation within species in the fT>MIC for static and cidal effect was marked; the 24 h bacteriostatic range was 14.1%-73.4% for P. mirabilis, 34.2%-44.6% for E. coli and 42.2%-62.5% for K. pneumoniae. Changes in ceftaroline population analysis profiles were observed with E. coli, K. pneumoniae and C. koseri, especially at fT>MIC values just below the bacteriostatic effect exposures. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline against the species within the Enterobacteriaceae group are different. K. pneumoniae requires higher drug exposures than E. coli, and P. mirabilis strains are highly variable, which may have important clinical correlates. Translational extrapolations from preclinical observations using E. coli to other Enterobacteriaceae species may not be optimal.

Pharmacodynamics of Ceftolozane plus Tazobactam Studied in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model of Infection.

Ceftolozane plus tazobactam is an antipseudomonal cephalosporin combined with tazobactam, an established beta-lactamase inhibitor, and has in vitro potency against a range of clinically important ß-lactamase-producing bacteria, including most extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase (ESBL)-positive Enterobacteriaceae. The pharmacodynamics of ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations presents a number of theoretical and practical challenges, including modeling different half-lives of the compounds. In this study, we studied the pharmacodynamics of ceftolozane plus tazobactam against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa using an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection. Five strains of E. coli, including three clinical strains plus two CTX-M-15 (one high and one moderate) producers, and five strains of P. aeruginosa, including two with OprD overexpression and AmpC ß-lactamases, were employed. Ceftolozane MICs (E. coli, 0.12 to 0.25 mg/liter, and P. aeruginosa, 0.38 to 8 mg/liter) were determined in the presence of 4 mg/liter tazobactam. Dose ranging of ceftolozane (percentage of time in which the free-drug concentration exceeds the MIC [fT>MIC], 0 to 100%) plus tazobactam (human pharmacokinetics) was simulated every 8 hours, with half-lives (t1/2) of 2.5 and 1 h, respectively. Ceftolozane and tazobactam concentrations were confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The ceftolozane-plus-tazobactam fT>MIC values at 24 h for a static effect and a 1-log and 2-log drop in initial inoculum for E. coli were 27.8% ± 5.6%, 33.0% ± 5.6%, and 39.6% ± 8.5%, respectively. CTX-M-15 production did not affect the 24-h fT>MIC for E. coli strains. The ceftolozane-plus-tazobactam fT>MIC values for a 24-h static effect and a 1-log and 2-log drop for P. aeruginosa were 24.9% ± 3.0%, 26.6% ± 3.9%, and 31.2% ± 3.6%. Despite a wide range of absolute MICs, the killing remained predictable as long as the MICs were normalized to the corresponding fT>MIC. Emergence of resistance on 4× MIC plates and 8× MIC plates occurred maximally at an fT>MIC of 10 to 30% and increased as time of exposure increased. The fT>MIC for a static effect for ceftolozane plus tazobactam is less than that observed with other cephalosporins against E. coli and P. aeruginosa and is more similar to the fT>MIC reported for carbapenems.

Pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

An in vitro single-compartment dilutional pharmacokinetic model was used to study the pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus (both methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA] and methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]). Mean serum free concentrations of ceftaroline (the active metabolite of the prodrug ceftaroline fosamil) dosed in humans at 600 mg every 12 h (q12h) were simulated, and activities against 12 S. aureus strains (3 MSSA strains and 9 MRSA strains, 3 of which had a vancomycin-intermediate phenotype) were determined. Ceftaroline produced 2.5- to 4.0-log10-unit reductions in viable counts by 24 h with all strains and a 0.5- to 4.0-log-unit drop in counts at 96 h. The antibacterial effect could not be related to the strain MIC across the ceftaroline MIC range from 0.12 to 2.0 µg/ml. In dose-ranging studies, the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period that the free drug concentration exceeded the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions (fT(MIC)) of 24.5% ± 8.9% was associated with a 24-h bacteriostatic effect, one of 27.8% ± 9.5% was associated with a -1-log-unit drop, and one of 32.1% ± 8.1% was associated with a -2-log-unit drop. The MSSA and MRSA strains had similar fT(MIC) values. fT(MIC) values increased with increasing duration of exposure up to 96 h. Changes in ceftaroline population analysis profiles were related to fT(MIC). fT(MIC)s of <50% were associated with growth on 4× MIC recovery plates at 96 h of drug exposure. These data support the use of ceftaroline fosamil at doses of 600 mg q12h to treat S. aureus strains with MICs of ≤ 2 µg/ml. An fT(MIC) of 25 to 30% would make a suitable pharmacodynamic index target, but fTMIC values of ≥ 50% are needed to suppress the emergence of resistance and require clinical evaluation.

Pharmacodynamics of the antibacterial effect of and emergence of resistance to doripenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

An in vitro dilutional pharmacokinetic model of infection was used to study the pharmacodynamics of doripenem in terms of the ability to kill Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii and also changes in their population profiles. In dose-ranging studies, the cumulative percentages of a 24-h period that the drug concentration exceeds the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions (T(MIC)s) required for doripenem to produce a 24-h bacteriostatic effect and a -2-log-unit reduction in viable count were 25% ± 11% and 35% ± 13%, respectively, for P. aeruginosa (MIC range, 0.24 to 3 mg/liter) and 20% ± 11% and 33% ± 12%, respectively, for Acinetobacter spp. (MIC range, 0.45 to 3.0 mg/liter). A T(MIC) of >40 to 50% produced a maximum response with both species at 24 h or 48 h of exposure. After 24 h of exposure to doripenem at a T(MIC) in the range of 12.5 to 37.5%, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii population profiles revealed mutants able to grow on 4× MIC-containing medium; such changes were further amplified by 48 h of exposure. Dose-fractionation experiments targeting T(MIC)s of 12.5%, 25%, or 37.5% as six exposures, two exposures, or a single exposure over 48 h with a single strain of P. aeruginosa indicated that changes in population profiles were greatest with multiple exposures at T(MIC) targets of 12.5 or 25%. In contrast, multiple exposures at 37.5% T(MIC) most effectively suppressed total bacterial counts and changes in population profiles. Simulations of human doses of doripenem of 500 mg, 1,000 mg, 2,000 mg, and 3,000 mg every 8 h over 96 h showed marked initial killing up to 6 h but growback thereafter. Changes in population profiles occurred only in the regimen of 500 mg every 8 h against P. aeruginosa but occurred with all dose regimens for A. baumannii strains. A doripenem T(MIC) of ≥40 to 50% is maximally effective in killing P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii and suppressing changes in population profiles in short-term experiments for up to 48 h; however, a T(MIC) of 12.5 to 25% amplifies population changes, especially with exposures every 8 h. In longer-term experiments, up to 96 h, even doripenem doses of 4 to 6 times those used in human studies proved incapable of pathogen eradication and prevention of changes in population profiles. The association of a T(MIC) of 25 to 37.5% with changes in population profiles has implications in terms of future clinical breakpoint setting.

Pharmacodynamics of razupenem (PZ601) studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Simulations of administration of razupenem at 1 g every 12 h by 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion were performed in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection. The antibacterial effect of this razupenem dosing regimen against six strains of Staphylococcus aureus (one methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [MSSA] strain [MIC, 0.015 µg/ml] and five methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] strains [MIC range, 0.09 to 3 µg/ml]) and five strains of Enterobacteriaceae (three Escherichia coli strains [two containing extended-spectrum ß-lactamases {ESBLs}] and two Enterobacter sp. strains [one with an AmpC enzyme and the other with a raised razupenem MIC; MIC range, 0.09 to 6 µg/ml]) was assessed. Against the MSSA and MRSA strains, razupenem produced a >3.5-log-unit reduction in viable count after 24 h. There were no changes in population profiles. In a second series of experiments, over 5 days there was rapid initial clearance of MRSA from the model followed by regrowth after 48 h. MRSA colonies appeared on 2× MIC recovery medium after 72 h with strain 33820 (MIC, 3.0 µg/ml) and at 120 h with strain 27706 (MIC, 1.5 µg/ml). Against E. coli and Enterobacter spp., razupenem produced a >3.5-log-unit reduction in bacterial counts for all strains except that with an MIC of 6 µg/ml, where razupenem had a notably poorer antibacterial effect. Population profiles were unchanged after 48 h of exposure to razupenem except for Enterobacter strain 34425 (MIC, 6.0 µg/ml), where colonies were recovered from media containing 2×, 4×, and 8× MIC. In dose-ranging studies with MRSA strains, the percentage of the dosing interval that the free drug concentration remained higher than the pathogen MIC (fT>MIC) for a 24-h bacteriostatic effect was 5.0% ± 1.4%, and that for a 1-log-unit reduction in count was 12.5% ± 5.8%. Population profiles indicated growth on 2× MIC recovery medium at fT>MIC values of 1 to 35% but not at a value of >35%. In a similar set of experiments with Enterobacteriaceae, the fT>MIC for a 24-h bacteriostatic effect was 34.2% ± 7.6% and that for a 1-log-unit reduction in count was 42.5% ± 7.8%. Population analysis profiles indicated growth on recovery media with 2×, 4×, and 8× MIC at fT>MICs in the range of 1 to 69% but rarely at values of ≥ 70%. In conclusion, razupenem at simulated human doses of 1 g i.v. every 12 h has a marked antibacterial effect on MSSA and MRSA strains with MICs of ≤ 3.0 µg/ml and Enterobacteriaceae with MICs of ≤ 0.4 µg/ml. fT>MIC targets of ≥ 35% for MRSA and ≥ 70% for Enterobacteriaceae should provide significant antibacterial effects combined with low risks of changing pathogen antibiotic population profiles.

Pharmacodynamics of telavancin studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

The antibacterial effects of telavancin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin against six Staphylococcus aureus strains (1 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA] strain, 4 methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] strains, and 1 vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus [VISA] strain) and three Enterococcus sp. strains (1 Enterococcus faecalis strain, 1 Enterococcus faecium strain, and 1 vancomycin-resistant E. faecium [VREF] strain) were compared using an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection. Analyzing the data from all five vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus (VSSA) strains or all 4 MRSA strains showed that telavancin was superior in its antibacterial effect as measured by the area under the bacterial kill curve at 24 h (AUBKC(24)) and 48 h (AUBKC(48)) in comparison to vancomycin or teicoplanin (P < 0.05). Telavancin was also superior to vancomycin and teicoplanin in terms of its greater early killing effect (P < 0.05). Against the three Enterococcus spp. tested, telavancin was superior to vancomycin in terms of its AUBKC(24), AUBKC(48), and greater early bactericidal effect (P < 0.05). Dose-ranging studies were performed to provide free-drug area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h in the steady state divided by the MIC (fAUC/MIC) exposures from 0 to 1,617 (7 to 14 exposures per strain) for 5 VSSA, 4 VISA, and the 3 Enterococcus strains. The fAUC/MIC values for a 24-h bacteriostatic effect and a 1-log-unit drop in the viable count were 43.1 ± 38.4 and 50.0 ± 39.0 for VSSA, 3.2 ± 1.3 and 4.3 ± 1.3 for VISA, and 15.1 ± 8.8 and 40.1 ± 29.4 for the Enterococcus spp., respectively. The reason for the paradoxically low fAUC/MIC values for VISA strains is unknown. There was emergence of resistance to telavancin in the dose-ranging studies, as indicated by subpopulations able to grow on plates containing 2× MIC telavancin concentrations compared to the preexposure population analysis profiles. Changes in population analysis profiles were less likely with enterococci than with S. aureus, and the greatest risk of changed profiles occurred for both species at fAUC/MIC ratios of 1 to 10. Maintaining a fAUC/MIC ratio of >50 reduced the risk of subpopulations able to grow on antibiotic-containing media emerging. These data help explain the clinical effectiveness of telavancin against MRSA and indicate that telavancin may have clinically useful activity against Enterococcus spp., and perhaps also VISA, at human doses of 10 mg/kg of body weight/day. In addition, they support a clinical breakpoint of sensitive at ≤1 mg/liter for both S. aureus and Enterococcus spp.