Retention rates of different Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: experience from a large monocentric cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been clearly shown. However, information on comparative drug retention rates (DRRs) of different JAKi is heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to compute and compare DRRs of different JAKi in a large cohort of RA patients. METHOD: Patients with RA treated with at least one JAKi and followed up at our centre were retrospectively identified. DRRs of each JAKi were computed at 24 months. The association of baseline features with drug persistence was tested. Variations in 28-joint Disease Activity Score-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores between baseline and 12 months were analysed. RESULTS: The study included 365 patients, with a total of 463 therapy courses. Tofacitinib was the most prescribed JAKi (33%), followed by baricitinib (25%), upadacitinib (24%), and filgotinib (21%). The mean treatment duration was 24 ± 17 months, with a maximum of 70 months. At 24 months, the overall DRR was 86%. DRRs were not significantly different across different JAKi. The only baseline predictor of treatment discontinuation was previous treatment with a biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) (hazard ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.53; p = 0.021). There were significant reductions in DAS28-CRP and CDAI 1 year after treatment start. CONCLUSIONS: In our large, monocentric cohort, the overall 24 month DRR for JAKi was greater than 80%. No significant differences in retention were found among different JAKi. Persistence was lower in patients who had previously been treated with other bDMARDs.

Presenting features and outcomes of cranial-limited and large-vessel giant cell arteritis: a retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: To compare the presenting features and outcomes of patients with cranial-limited (C-) and large-vessel (LV-) giant cell arteritis (GCA).Methods: Data from our GCA cohort were collected retrospectively. Patients who underwent total-body large-vessel imaging within 10 days after commencing steroid therapy were included. Patients with LV involvement were classified as LV-GCA. Presenting features, treatments, and outcomes of LV-GCA and C-GCA patients were compared.Results: 161 patients were included (LV-GCA, n = 100). At baseline, LV-GCA patients were younger than those with C-GCA (73.2 ± 8.9 vs 76 ± 8.8 years, p = 0.018) and had a longer delay to diagnosis (3.5 ± 4.6 vs 2.3 ± 4.9 months, p = 0.001). C-GCA patients had a higher incidence of headache (p = 0.006) and ischaemic optic neuropathy (p < 0.001), whereas LV-GCA patients had more systemic symptoms (fever, p = 0.002; fatigue, p < 0.001; weight loss, p < 0.001; night sweats, p = 0.015) and dry cough (p = 0.031). Corrected cumulative prednisone dose, relapse-free survival, relapse-rate, and incidence of ascending aortic aneurysms were not significantly different between the two subgroups. A steroid-sparing agent was added in 73% of LV- and 55.7% of C-GCA patients (p = 0.027), but was introduced more frequently at baseline in LV-GCA patients (52% vs 23.5%, p = 0.006). LV-GCA patients initially treated with glucocorticoid monotherapy relapsed sooner (relapse-free survival, HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.78, p < 0.001) and had a higher relapse rate (relapses per 10 person-years, 6.73 ± 11.50 vs 3.82 ± 10.83, p = 0.011).Conclusion: LV-GCA patients were younger at diagnosis and suffered a longer diagnostic delay. The outcomes of the two subgroups were similar. An earlier introduction of steroid-sparing agents in LV-GCA patients might have played a positive role.

Gender differences in clinical presentation and vascular pattern in patients with Takayasu arteritis.

Objective: To compare clinical characteristics and pattern of vascular involvement at disease onset according to gender specificity in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA).Methods: Data from 117 TA patients (11 male, 106 female), diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria, from our centre were retrospectively collected. Differences between men and women regarding demographic features, diagnostic delay, signs and symptoms attributed to TA, and arteries involved at diagnosis were compared. Data were obtained from three published articles describing gender differences in TA. A global analysis of these three cohorts plus ours (a total of 578 patients; 108 men, 470 women) was performed.Results: In our TA cohort, age at disease onset and age at diagnosis were not significantly different between genders. Diagnostic delay was higher in men. Male patients showed higher involvement of iliac arteries (right, p = 0.016; left, p = 0.021); females suffered more frequently from upper limb claudication (p = 0.026). In the overall analysis, men had higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (p = 0.007) and more frequent involvement of abdominal aorta (p = 0.026), renal arteries (right, p < 0.001; left, p < 0.001), and iliac arteries (right, p = 0.009; left, p = 0.002). Women more frequently exhibited upper limb claudication (p = 0.042) and involvement of left subclavian artery (p = 0.005), carotid arteries (right, p < 0.001; left, p < 0.001), and supradiaphragmatic aorta (ascending, p = 0.050; arch, p < 0.001; descending, p = 0.003). Inflammatory markers were more frequently raised in women (p = 0.005).Conclusions: In TA patients, gender has a strong influence on pattern of vascular involvement and consequently on clinical presentation. Specifically, women have a higher involvement of the supradiaphragmatic vessels, whereas in men the abdominal vessels are more frequently affected.