Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 12(4): e0175387, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28414808

ABSTRACT

This study examined a knowledge-centered theory of institutional trust development. In the context of trust in water regulatory institutions, the moderating impact of knowledge was tested to determine if there were longitudinal changes in the bases of institutional trust as a function of increases in knowledge about a target institution. We hypothesized that as people learn about an institution with which they were previously unfamiliar, they begin to form more nuanced perceptions, distinguishing the new institution from other institutions and relying less upon their generalized trust to estimate their trust in that institution. Prior to having specific, differential information about a new institution, we expected institutional trust to be a function of generalized trust variables such as dispositional trust and trust in government. The longitudinal experiment involved 185 college students randomly assigned to one of three information conditions. Every 3 months for 15 months, participants read information about water regulatory institutions or a control institution. At each time point, participants reported their trust in and perceptions of the trust- and distrust-worthiness of the water regulatory institutions. Participants also completed measures of knowledge of water regulatory institutions, dispositional trust, and governmental trust. Our manipulation check indicated that, as expected, those in the experimental group increased in subjective knowledge of water regulatory institutions to a greater extent than those in the control condition. Consistent with our hypotheses, there was some evidence that, compared to the control group, the experimental group relied less on their general trust in government as a basis for their trust in water regulatory institutions. However, contrary to our hypotheses, there was no evidence the experimental group relied less on dispositional trust as a basis for institutional trust. There also was some evidence the experimental group's trust in water regulatory institutions was less affected by fluctuations of trustworthiness (but not distrustworthiness) perceptions over time. This suggests that knowledge results in the development of more stable institutional trust attitudes, but that trustworthiness and distrustworthiness perceptions may operate somewhat differently when impacting trust in specific institutions.


Subject(s)
Knowledge , Trust/psychology , Adult , Attitude , Female , Government , Health Facilities , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Public Opinion , Young Adult
2.
Nebr Symp Motiv ; 62: 1-11, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26410918

Subject(s)
Organizations , Trust , Humans
3.
Behav Sci Law ; 29(1): 95-115, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21264926

ABSTRACT

Despite its contemporary and theoretical importance in numerous social scientific disciplines, institutional confidence research is limited by a lack of consensus regarding the distinctions and relationships among related constructs (e.g., trust, confidence, legitimacy, distrust, etc.). This study examined four confidence-related constructs that have been used in studies of trust/confidence in the courts: dispositional trust, trust in institutions, obligation to obey the law, and cynicism. First, the separability of the four constructs was examined by exploratory factor analyses. Relationships among the constructs were also assessed. Next, multiple regression analyses were used to explore each construct's independent contribution to confidence in the courts. Finally, a second study replicated the first study and also examined the stability of the institutional confidence constructs over time. Results supported the hypothesized separability of, and correlations among, the four confidence-related constructs. The extent to which the constructs independently explained the observed variance in confidence in the courts differed as a function of the specific operationalization of confidence in the courts and the individual predictor measures. Implications for measuring institutional confidence and future research directions are discussed.


Subject(s)
Jurisprudence , Law Enforcement , Public Opinion , Trust , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Nebraska , Principal Component Analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
5.
J Interpers Violence ; 21(8): 1063-80, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16829667

ABSTRACT

It has been argued that battered women who kill their abusers represent a special class of defendants being unfairly treated in the legal system. As a result, commentators have argued for reforms to permit the judicial system to respond more fairly. Researchers have investigated the influences of these prescribed legal modifications and the possible influence of various demographic and psychological factors on legal reforms. However, social scientists have not yet asked some fundamental, psychological questions. Is the law consistent with what society believes is right and just? Is there a commonsense notion of justice in these cases? What factors constitute cognitive decision rules and influence judgments in cases of battered women who kill their abusers? This study uses a basic, psychological method to identify psychological factors that are important in judgments regarding battered women who kill and to better understand commonsense notions of justice in these cases.


Subject(s)
Battered Women/legislation & jurisprudence , Homicide/legislation & jurisprudence , Spouse Abuse/legislation & jurisprudence , Battered Women/psychology , Female , Forensic Psychiatry , Homicide/psychology , Humans , Male , Social Support , Social Values , Spouse Abuse/psychology
6.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law ; 31(1): 58-64, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12817844

ABSTRACT

Studies have identified risk factors that show a strong association with violent behavior in psychiatric populations. Yet, little research has been conducted on the documentation of violence risk information in actual clinical practice, despite the relevance of such documentation to risk assessment liability and to conducting effective risk management. In this study, the documentation of cues of risk for violence were examined in psychiatric settings. Patient charts (n = 283) in four psychiatric settings were reviewed for documentation of violence risk information summarized in the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study. The results revealed that particular patient and institutional variables influenced documentation practices. The presence of personality disorder, for example, predicted greater documentation of cues of violence risk, regardless of clinical setting. These findings have medicolegal implications for risk assessment liability and clinical implications for optimizing risk management in psychiatric practice.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Psychiatric , Medical History Taking , Violence , Adult , Empirical Research , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Factors , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...