ABSTRACT
In Japan, a re-examination system was introduced in the 1970s, and Post-marketing surveillance (PMS) has been conducted in many cases after the launch of new drugs or the approval of new indications for existing drugs. The revised Good Post-marketing Study Practice (r-GPSP) was enacted in 1 April 2018, and more scientific approach has been required for PMS. The survey aims to identify what kinds of change occurred in the PMS planned after r-GPSP enacted. As for the study method, after confirming the review report of each product, Risk Management Plan (RMP), and the package insert, and extracting necessary items, tabulation and analysis were performed. As a result of analysis, Drug Use Investigations (DUI) still accounted for more than 60％ of the total in PMS. Regarding the target number of DUI, Fifty-eight out of 90 had a sample size of 500 or fewer, only 3 studies exceeded 3,000. Regarding the newly introduced Post-marketing database surveillance (DB study) after r-GPSP enacted, 13 products and 18 surveillances were confirmed, although the number was not as large as the number of DUI. The most used database was Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. (MDV), which were used in twelve DB studies, and cardiovascular disease and interstitial pneumonia were set as survey targets for safety considerations in multiple studies. There was no Drug Use Comparative Investigation. Furthermore, there were two products which were approved on the condition with re-examination period but did not required additional Pharmacovigilance activities. In terms of sample size calculation, 88 out of 135 studies mentioned rationales for setting the number of samples. Of which, 58 studies had statistical rationales. In many studies, the sample size calculation method that was commonly used in conventional PMSs, called ‘Rule of three’ was described as the statistical rational. After r-GPSP enacted, newly introduced Post-marketing surveillance, including DB surveys, and the scientific approach recommended by PMDA have been adopted in companies gradually. In the future, in order to further promote the scientific approach, it is necessary to further improve the capability of human resources of companies involved in PMS.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical significance of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy during interval debulking surgery (IDS) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 124 advanced EOC patients and analyzed the details of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), IDS, postoperative treatment, and prognoses. RESULTS: Following IDS, 98 patients had no gross residual disease (NGRD), 15 had residual disease sized or =1 cm (suboptimal). Two-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 88.8% and 39.8% in the NGRD group, 40.0% and 13.3% in the optimal group (p<0.001 vs. NGRD for both), and 36.3% and 0% in the suboptimal group, respectively. Five-year OS and 2-year PFS rates were 62% and 56.1% in the lymph node-negative (LN-) group and 26.2% and 24.5% in the lymph node-positive (LN+) group (p=0.0033 and p=0.0024 vs. LN-, respectively). Furthermore, survival in the LN+ group, despite surgical removal of positive nodes, was the same as that in the unknown LN status group, in which lymphadenectomy was not performed (p=0.616 and p=0.895, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified gross residual tumor during IDS (hazard ratio, 3.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.31 to 10.33 vs. NGRD) as the only independent predictor of poor OS. CONCLUSION: NGRD after IDS improved prognosis in advanced EOC patients treated with NACT-IDS. However, while systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy during IDS may predict outcome, it does not confer therapeutic benefits.
