Comparison of the Efficancy and Complication Rates of the Hybrid Maze, Complete Cox-Maze and Catheter Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the United States. It has been associated with a reduction in patient quality of life and more serious complications such as stroke and heart failure. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of commonly performed invasive procedures in keeping patients in normal sinus rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent primary radiofrequency catheter ablation, the complete Cox-maze, or the hybrid maze at OSF Saint Anthony Medical Center between January 2010 and December 2013 (n=140). Immediately post-procedure, arrhythmia recurrence rates did not differ between the groups (p = 0.28). At all follow-up points thereafter, however, differences in procedural efficacy between surgical and catheter therapy remained highly significant (p < 0.001). At 2 years, 20.3% of the catheter ablation patients were in normal sinus rhythm, when compared to 57.9% of hybrid maze and 72.7% the complete Cox-maze groups. A difference in major complication rates was noted (p = 0.04), with the complete Cox-maze having a 17.4%, the hybrid having 22.7%, and the catheter ablation group having 5.6%. CONCLUSIONS: This study was unable to detect differences in the efficacy rates of the surgical procedures, however they were both superior to catheter ablation. Although the hybrid approach is considered minimally invasive, complication rates were similar to those of the complete Cox-maze. Catheter ablation was the safest procedure, and since evidence of reduced mortality after the use of aggressive rhythm therapy is currently lacking, the results suggest that hybrid surgery for atrial fibrillation should be used after the failure of more conservative measures.

Napping on the Night Shift: A Study of Sleep, Performance, and Learning in Physicians-in-Training.

BACKGROUND: Physicians in training experience fatigue from sleep loss, high workload, and working at an adverse phase of the circadian rhythm, which collectively degrades task performance and the ability to learn and remember. To minimize fatigue and sustain performance, learning, and memory, humans generally need 7 to 8 hours of sleep in every 24-hour period. METHODS: In a naturalistic, within-subjects design, we studied 17 first- and second-year internal medicine residents working in a tertiary care medical center, rotating between day shift and night float every 4 weeks. We studied each resident for 2 weeks while he/she worked the day shift and for 2 weeks while he/she worked the night float, objectively measuring sleep by wrist actigraphy, vigilance by the Psychomotor Vigilance Task test, and visual-spatial and verbal learning and memory by the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised and the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test. RESULTS: Residents, whether working day shift or night float, slept approximately 7 hours in every 24-hour period. Residents, when working day shift, consolidated their sleep into 1 main sleep period at night. Residents working night float split their sleep, supplementing their truncated daytime sleep with nighttime on-duty naps. There was no difference in vigilance or learning and memory, whether residents worked day shift or night float. CONCLUSIONS: Off-duty sleep supplemented with naps while on duty appears to be an effective strategy for sustaining vigilance, learning, and memory when working night float.