Safety and tolerance of combination of monoamine oxidase inhibitors and direct dopamine agonists in adults and older adults with highly resistant depression.

INTRODUCTION: Dopamine (DA) is likely to be involved in some depressive dimensions, such as anhedonia and amotivation, which account for a part of treatment-resistant forms. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) and direct D2 and D3 receptors agonists (D2/3r-dAG) are known to help, but we lack safety data about their combined usage. We report on safety and tolerance of the MAOI+D2r-dAG combination in a clinical series. METHOD: All patients referred to our recourse center for depression between 2013 and 2021 were screened to select those who did receive the combo. Data were extracted from clinical files. RESULTS: Sixteen patients of 60±17 years of age (8 women, 7 with age>65years, all suffered from treatment resistant depression, 7 with bipolar disorder) received the combo. There were no life-threatening adverse effects (AE). However, AE were reported by 14 patients (88%) most of which were mild and consisted of insomnia, nausea, nervousness, confusion, impulse control disorder and/or "sleep attacks". One patient presented a serious AE requiring a short hospitalization for confusion. Intolerance led to failure to introduce treatment in two patients (13%). The retrospective non-interventional design, the variety of molecules, and the modest sample size limited the scope of these results. CONCLUSION: There was no life-threatening safety issue in combining MAOI and D2/3r-dAG, especially regarding cardiovascular side effects. The systematic screening of AE might account for their frequency, but these precluded the treatment in only two patients. Comparative studies are needed to assess the efficacy of this new combination.

The effect of proprioceptive knee bracing on knee stability during three different sport related movement tasks in healthy subjects and the implications to the management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Proprioceptive knee braces have been shown to improve knee mechanics, however much of the work to date has focused on tasks such as slow step down tasks rather than more dynamic sporting tasks. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore if such improvements in stability may be seen during faster sports specific tasks as well as slower tasks. METHOD: Twelve subjects performed a slow step down, single leg drop jump and pivot turn jump with and without a silicone web brace. 3D kinematics of the knee were collected using a ten camera Qualisys motion analysis system. Reflective markers were placed on the foot, shank, thigh and pelvis using the Calibrated Anatomical Systems Technique. A two way ANOVA with repeated measures was performed with post-hoc pairwise comparison to explore the differences between the two conditions and three tasks. RESULTS: Significant differences were seen in the knee joint angles and angular velocities in the sagittal, coronal and transverse planes between the tasks. The brace showed a reduction in knee valgum and internal rotation across all tasks, with the most notable effect during the single leg drop jump and pivot turn jump. The transverse plane also showed a significant reduction in the external rotation knee angular velocity when wearing the brace. DISCUSSION: The brace influenced the knee joint kinematics in coronal and transverse planes which confirms that such braces can have a significant effect on knee control during dynamic tasks. Further studies are required exploring the efficacy of proprioceptive braces in athletic patient cohort.