Functional outcomes and center of rotation restoration in total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture: A review of 367 hips.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) after acetabular fracture is typically performed months or years later for posttraumatic arthritis after initial conservative treatment. But THA can be performed earlier after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the fracture. The aim of this study was to determine which strategy is best. The primary outcome measure was the radiological restoration of the hip's center of rotation (COR). The secondary outcome measures were the incidence of complications and the hip's functional scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter cohort was analyzed by splitting patients into three groups: group A (THA within 3weeks of fracture); group B (THA deferred after early ORIF); group C (THA more than 3weeks after fracture, without ORIF). Group B was separated into two subgroups: B- (THA less than 1year after ORIF) and B+ (THA more than 1year after ORIF). The demographics, surgical techniques, COR superior and lateral migration coefficient and functional scores (HHS, HOOS-PS and FJS) were recorded. The functional scores were gathered using PROMs. RESULTS: In all, 367 patients were included: 108 in group A, 69 in group B-, 113 in group B+ and 77 in group C. The mean follow-up was 5.8years [3.4 months-35years]. The mean age of the patients was 69.2years [SD 15; 26-101], 52years [SD 16; 19-83], 49years [SD 16; 16-85] and 58.1years [SD 17; 13-94], respectively (p<0.01). The mean ASA score was 2.13 [SD 0.70], 1.84 [SD 0.65], 1.67 [SD 0.63] and 1.79 [SD 0.60], respectively (p<0.01). A complex Letournel fracture was present in 63 patients (61%), 46 patients (71%), 48 patients (49%) and 38 patients (62%), respectively (p<0.01). A reinforcement cage was implanted in 38 patients (69%), 16 patients (62%), 5 patients (12%) and 19 patients (66%), respectively (p<0.01). Cement was used in 45 patients (45%), 23 patients (35%), 19 patients (18%) and 21 patients (32%), respectively (p<0.01). A graft was needed in 46 patients (46%), 35 patients (53%), 17 patients (16%) and 21 patients (48%), respectively (p<0.01). Posterior ORIF was done in 40 patients (46%), 32 patients (55%), 64 patients (61%) and 9 patients (82%), respectively (p<0.01). The COR lateral migration coefficient was significantly higher in group C with a mean of +0.17 (SD 0.85) [-0.27 to +6] compared to the other groups (p=0.02). The COR superior migration coefficient was comparable between groups, with a mean of +0.77 (SD 2.26) [-0.99 to 27], p>0.05. There were complications in 10 patients (9.2%), 6 patients (8.7%), 6 patients (5.3%) and 3 patients (3.9%), respectively, with no significant difference between groups. The PROMs were completed by 51% of patients. At the final review, the mean HHS was 79.2 (SD 21.8) and the mean HOOS-PS was 77.7 (SD 20.1) in the entire cohort, p>0.05. The mean FJS by group was 55.9 (30.2), 47.7 (SD 36.4), 66.1 (SD 30.4) and 65.8 (SD 30.3), respectively (p=0.02). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The B strategy (B+) yielded good outcomes in terms of function and COR restoration. When using this strategy, anterior ORIF preserves the native hip for a subsequent THA through a posterior approach. Strategy C also produces good functional outcomes but shifts the COR laterally. This study confirms the poor results of strategy A in previous publications. When the prognosis is poor, immediate mobilization after anterior ORIF followed by THA within 1year appears to be a good strategy (group B-). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, observational study.

Navigated pedicle screw insertion with the Surgivisio system: Malposition rate and risk factors - about 648 screws.

PURPOSE: Pedicle screw malposition rates vary greatly in scientific literature depending on the chosen criteria. Different techniques have been developed to lower the risk of screw malposition. Our primary objective is to evaluate the malposition rate associated with the use of the Surgivisio navigation system and to identify risk factors for screw malposition. The secondary objectives are to assess operating time and radiation data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a monocentric retrospective consecutive case series. All patients operated for pedicle screw implantation using the Surgivisio system between September 2017 and June 2020 were included. Screw positioning was evaluated on postoperative CT scans using Heary and Gertzbein classifications. Thirteen potential risk factors for screw malposition were hypothesized and tested with a univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Six hundred and forty-eight screws could be evaluated in 97 patients. Our study reported a 92.4% satisfactory screw implantation rate with a mean operative time per screw of 14.5±6.7minutes and a patient effective dose of 0.47±0.31 mSv per screw. One screw was neurotoxic and required an early revision (0.15%). Three risk factors for screw malposition have been identified in a multivariate analysis: female gender (OR=2.13 [1.11; 4], p=0.0219), an implantation level above D10 (OR=2.17 [1.13; 4.16], p=0.0197), and an "open" surgery (as opposed to percutaneous) (OR=3.47 [1.83; 6.56], p=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Pedicle screw malposition rate and operative time with the Surgivisio navigation system are comparable with those reported in scientific literature. We theorized that intraoperative patient reference displacement could be a major cause of navigation failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Fragility fractures of the pelvis: First 48 cases of surgical treatment at a level 1 trauma center in France.

INTRODUCTION: Longer life expectancy is accompanied by a higher incidence of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP), which has repercussions on mortality and nursing home admissions. Given the paucity of data at French healthcare facilities, we carried out a retrospective study to (1) evaluate how surgical treatment of FFP with posterior displacement (type III and IV according to Rommens and Hofmann) affects a patient's pain, functional status and ability to stay at home and (2) evaluate the postoperative complications and mortality rate. HYPOTHESIS: Surgery for posteriorly displaced FFP will relieve pain and preserve the patient's independence. METHODS: All the patients over 65 years of age who were operated on for a posterior FFP between January 2015 and August 2020 were included in this prospective, single-center study. The demographics, fracture type, details of the surgical treatment, complications and mortality were analyzed. Pain (visual analog scale, VAS), functional status (Activity of Daily Living [ADL] and Instrumental Activity of Daily Living [IADL]), mobility (Parker score) and rates of nursing home admissions were compared before the fracture, after surgery and at a mean follow-up of 28 months (minimum follow-up of 1 year). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with a mean age of 75 years were included. Twenty-four of these patients (50%) had at least two comorbidities. The FFPs were either type IV (31/48; 65%) or type III (17/48; 35%). The mean VAS for pain was significantly lower on the first day postoperative (3.5 versus 4.8; p=0.02). This significant reduction continued upon discharge from the hospital (1.95; p=0.003) and persisted at the mean follow-up of 28 months (2.2; p=0.64). The complication rate was 15% (7/48) and the mortality rate at the final review was 15% (7/48). Among the surviving patients, 81% (29/36) returned to living at home. The ADL (5.1 versus 5.8; p=0.09), IADL (5.9 versus 6.9; p=0.15) and Parker score (6.8 versus 8.2; p=0.08) at the final review were not significantly different from the values before the fracture. CONCLUSION: This is the first French study of patients operated on for an FPP. Fixation of posteriorly displaced fractures allows surviving patients to retain their mobility. Pain relief is achieved quickly and maintained during the follow-up period. Thus, our initial hypothesis is affirmed. The complication rate is not insignificant; given the complexity of this surgery, percutaneous treatment is preferable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study.

Simulation Software to Plan the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures: The Patient-Specific Biomechanical Model.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of using simulation software for preoperative planning: a patient-specific biomechanical model (PSBM) in acetabular surgery. The secondary objectives were to assess operating time, intraoperative bleeding, and peroperative complications. DESIGN: This is a prospective control study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Between January 2019 and December 2022, patients with operative acetabular fracture treated by the first author were prospectively enrolled. INTERVENTION: Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the use or not of PSBM for preoperative planning. When PSBM was used, data were extracted from the preoperative high-resolution computed tomography scans to build a biomechanical model implemented in a custom software [simulation (SIM group)]. When computed tomography scans were not performed in our hospital, PSBM was not feasible (non-SIM group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiological results, surgery duration, blood loss, and peroperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included; 26 in the PSBM group and 40 in the standard group. The 2 groups were comparable regarding fracture patterns and epidemiological data. After simulation, in the SIM group, a poor reduction (>3 mm) was found in 2 of 26 patients (7.7%) versus 11 of 40 patients (27.5%) in the non-SIM group, P = 0.048. The mean operative time was shorter after simulation (110 minutes vs. 155 minutes, P = 0.01), and the mean blood loss was reduced (420 vs. 670 mL, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: By reducing the peroperative trials for reduction, PSBM allows better reduction in a shorter operative time and with less blood loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II: prospective study.

Surgical treatment of terrible triad of the elbow: Retrospective continuous 50-patient series at 2 years' follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Terrible triad (TT) of the elbow is an association at high risk of instability. Treatment aims to restore joint stability. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) repair is systematic, whereas medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair is only exceptionally necessary. The main aim of the present study was to assess clinical results in TT surgery. The secondary objective was to compare clinical progression with versus without MCL repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study included 50 TTs operated on via an isolated lateral or combined medial-lateral approach. Clinical assessment comprised MEPS, QuickDASH, VAS, flexion-extension and pronation-supination, and return to work and sport. Subgroup analysis was made according to associated MCL repair. RESULTS: Fifty patients (19 female, 31 male) were operated on between January 2006 and January 2017. Mean follow-up was 24 months. At last follow-up, mean MEPS was 89.1, VAS 0.7, QuickDASH 16, flexion-extension 114°, and pronation-supination 137°. Only MEPS was significantly improved by MCL repair (p=0.02), with no significant difference in complications. DISCUSSION: TT surgery with immediate mobilization gave good long-term functional results, not significantly improved by MCL repair. The lateral approach should be adopted in first line, with the medial approach in second line in case of persistent instability after lateral osteo-ligamentous repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study.

Navigated Cementoplasty With O-Arm and Surgivisio: An Ambispective Comparison With Radiation Exposure.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral compression fractures (VCF) are usually treated by cementoplasty. Computerized navigation allows more accurate surgery without additional imaging acquisition for guidance and related radiation exposure. New technologies trend to optimize the irradiation for patients and surgeons. The objective was to investigate the radiological results and radiation exposure of O-arm navigation compared with the all-in-one 2-dimensional/3-dimensional (2D/3D) Surgivisio device in navigated cementoplasty procedures. METHODS: Patients in the O-arm group comprised an O-arm prospective cohort as well as previous patients. Operations for VCF by navigated cementoplasty took place over 18 months. Patients in the Surgivisio group were the first patients operated on using Surgivisio and were prospectively recruited. Demographic, operative, and irradiation data were collected, as well as the image quality subjectively evaluated by the surgeon. The vertebal filling was evaluated using the Garnier classification and quoted as satisfactory, acceptable, or poor. The effective dose in millisievert (mSv) was calculated for radiation exposure estimation, and the absolute risk of cancer (AR) in percent equivalent to a whole-body irradiation was also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included: 62 in the O-arm group and 61 in the Surgivisio group. A total of 166 vertebrae were analyzed. Compared with the Surgivisio group, the effective dose was significantly higher in the O-arm group, with a mean of 11.47 vs 1.14 mSv, respectively (P < 0.001). The 2D part of the effective dose received by the surgeon was significantly higher in the O-arm group, with an average of 2.25 vs 0.47 mSv, respectively (P < 0.001). Overall AR followed the same trend, with a mean of 4.9 × 10-4% in the O-arm group and 5.7 × 10-5% in the Surgivisio group (P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly higher in the O-arm group (34.52 vs 30.12 minutes respectively, P = 0.03). Image quality was similarly sufficient in 3D, but in 2D, image quality was significantly better in the O-arm group (P = 0.01). Vertebral filling was significantly better in the O-arm group, with 100% of results reported as satisfactory and acceptable versus 85% in the Surgivisio group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The O-arm delivered a 10-times higher effective dose during navigated cementoplasty in comparison with the Surgivisio device. The O-arm also had a longer operative time, but it had better image quality and radiological results.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of antegrade posterior column screw fixation of the acetabulum.

INTRODUCTION: Antegrade posterior column screw fixation (APCS) provides stable fixation while reducing the complications related to dual acetabular approaches. The objective of this study was to present the radiological and clinical outcomes of fixation of the posterior column of the acetabulum through a single anterior approach. HYPOTHESIS: APCS will produce better clinical and radiological outcomes relative to not placing any screws in the posterior column. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study of 69 patients operated through a single anterior approach for a both-column fracture of the acetabulum between 2014 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups (APCS+, n=24 and APCS-, n=45) depending on whether the posterior column was fixed with an antegrade lag screw or not. The radiological outcomes were defined by the quality of the reduction according to Matta. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris Hip score and Merle Postel D'Aubigné (MDP) score at the final assessment. A sequential hierarchical analysis was done with a Chi2 test for the radiological criterion and Student's t test for the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In the APCS+ group, the reduction was anatomical in 71% (17/24) of patients, imperfect in 12% (3/24) and poor in 17% (4/24). In the APCS- group, the reduction was anatomical in 33% (15/45) of patients, imperfect in 31% (14/45) and poor in 35% (16/45). This difference between groups was statistically significant (p=.012). The differences between groups in the Harris (p=.201) and MDP (p>.05) scores were not significant. Mean irradiation in the APCS+ group was significantly higher (114.8 cGy.cm-2) relative to the APCS- group (39.8 cGy.cm-2) (p<.001). None of the patients in the APCS+ group underwent a subsequent total hip arthroplasty, while 8 patients from the APCS- group did (p=.031). The differences in the postoperative complications were not statistically significant. DISCUSSION: APCS yields satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes without increasing the complication rate; this must be balanced out against the additional irradiation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Zoledronic Acid Contraindications Prevalence among Hip-Fractured Patients Aged 75 Years or Over Hospitalized in an Orthogeriatric Unit.

OBJECTIVE: Zoledronic acid (ZA) is an antiosteoporotic drug that has been proven to reduce mortality after a hip fracture (HF). ZA is however underused with older HF patients. One possible cause may be the high prevalence of severe renal failure and hypocalcemia which contraindicate ZA administration. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of these 2 contraindications in patients aged 75 years or older admitted into an orthogeriatric (OG) unit after a low-energy HF. The secondary objective was to assess the prevalence of situations in which ZA must be used with caution. METHODS: Our retrospective descriptive monocentric study was performed in an OG unit on a cohort of elderly patients hospitalized for HF from August 2015 to August 2017. Prevalence of hypocalcemia lower than 2 mmol/L and Cockcroft creatinine clearance lower than 35 mL/min was recorded. RESULTS: Among the 194 patients admitted for HF, 136 patients (mean age 86 ± 5.6 years; 101 women) were included. The mean length of hospital stay was 15 ± 9 days. 111 (81.5%) had no contraindications to ZA administration. More than 80% presented situations in which ZA had to be used with caution, including 25(OH)D deficiency (20%). CONCLUSION: The majority of subjects aged 75 years or older admitted to hospital after an HF seem to have no contraindication for ZA administration during their immediate postoperative hospital stay. The hospitalization period after HF repair gives the opportunity to give most of them this treatment to improve their prognosis, taking into account situations in which ZA must be used with caution.

Screw misplacement in percutaneous posterior pelvic iliosacral screwing with and without navigation: A prospective clinical study of 174 screws in 127 patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies of iliosacral screw fixation performed using intraoperative navigation systems have shown promising results. The Surgivisio Platform is a new-generation three-dimensional intraoperative navigation tool that has been used at our institution for 2years. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the contribution of navigation in terms of iliosacral screw positioning accuracy and of radiation exposure, by comparing outcomes with vs. without navigation. HYPOTHESIS: Navigation allows more accurate percutaneous iliosacral screw positioning regardless of the type of screw fixation (with sacral dysmorphism and/or cemented screw fixation and/or multiple screw fixation). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2019, consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation of pelvic ring fractures without vertical instability were included in this single-centre prospective study. Screw position accuracy was evaluated by postoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Operative time, radiation dose, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: We included 127 patients with 174 iliosacral screws, of which 129 were positioned under fluoroscopic guidance and 45 using navigation. According to the modified Gras classification, 7% (12/174) of the screws were incorrectly positioned and 2% (4/174) required repositioning. The frequency of screw malposition was not significantly different between the fluoroscopy and navigation groups (8.5%, 11/129 vs. 2.2%, 1/45, respectively; p=0.19). However, screw position in dysmorphic sacra was significantly better with navigation (p=0.04), whereas no significant difference in final screw position was found for cemented or multiple screw implantations. In the navigation group, the operative time was significantly longer (28.2min vs. 21.6min, p=0.003), and the mean dose-area product significantly greater (6.6Gy·cm2 vs. 4.9Gy·cm2, p=0.02). The complication rates were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In patients who have pelvic ring fractures without vertical instability, navigation of percutaneous iliosacral screw placement using the Surgivisio Platform improves screw positioning in dysmorphic sacra, at the cost of a longer operative time and greater radiation exposure of the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective study.

Gait Analysis Platform for Measuring Surgery Recovery.

Gait analysis has evolved significantly during last years due to the great development of the Medical Internet of Things (MIoT) platforms that allow an easy integration of sensors (inertial, magnetic and pressure in our case) to the complex analytics required to compute, not only relevant parameters, but also meaningful indexes. In this paper, we extend a previous development based on a fully wireless pair of insoles by implementing an updated version with more reliable and user-friendly devices, smartphone app and web front-end and back-end. We also extend previous work focused on fall analysis (with the corresponding fall risk index or FRI) with the proposal of a new surgery recovery index (SRI) to account for the individual speed recovery speed that can be measured either at clinical facilities or at home in a telemedicine environment or while doing daily life activities. This new index can be personalized for different types of surgeries that affect gait such as hip, knee, etc. This paper presents the case of hip recovery and is built on top of the clinical standard SPPB test and allows obtaining quantitative parameters directly from the sensors.

Management of preoperative pain in elderly patients with moderate to severe cognitive deficits and hip fracture: a retrospective, monocentric study in an orthogeriatric unit.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cognitive deficits are 3 times more likely to suffer a hip fracture than geriatric patients of the same age group without cognitive deficits. The persistence of perioperative pain following hip fracture is a risk factor for the occurrence of delirium, poor functional prognosis, and the development of secondary chronic pain. Patients with cognitive deficits receive 20 to 60% less analgesics than those without cognitive deficits. Our retrospective descriptive monocentric study was performed in an orthogeriatric unit on a cohort of elderly patients hospitalized for hip fracture. The aim of the study was to compare the quantity of strong opioids delivered in a morphine sulfate equivalent daily during the preoperative period after a hip fracture between cognitively intact patients and those with cognitive deficits. RESULTS: Our total population of 69 patients had a median age of 90 years old, and 46% of these patients had moderate or severe cognitive deficits. During the preoperative period, the same quantity of strong opioids was administered to both groups of patients (13.1 mg/d versus 10.8 mg/d (p = 0.38)). Patients with moderate to severe cognitive deficits more often experienced delirium during their hospitalization (p < 0.01) and received more psychotropic drugs in the first 3 postoperative days (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: We reported that with standardized pain management in an orthogeriatric unit, patients aged 75 years and older received the same daily average quantity of strong opioids during the preoperative period regardless of the presence of cognitive deficits.

Complications and outcomes in 69 consecutive patients with floating hip.

BACKGROUND: Floating hip is a rare and potentially serious injury. The objective of this study was to evaluate our management strategy for patients with floating hip. HYPOTHESIS: A standardized strategy with specialised multidisciplinary management is associated with a low mortality rate. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had surgery to treat floating hip between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in this single-centre retrospective study. Epidemiological, clinical, and radiological data were collected and analysed. Patients were managed according to a standardised strategy adapted to the haemodynamic status and type of floating hip (type A, femoral and pelvic ring fractures; type B, femoral and acetabular fractures; and type C, femoral, acetabular, and pelvic ring fractures). The clinical outcome at last follow-up was determined by a telephone interview, based on the Majeed and Oxford scores, sports resumption, and work resumption. To assess the radiological outcomes, we applied Matta's criteria for the acetabulum and Tornetta's criteria for the pelvic ring. RESULTS: We included 69 patients with a mean age of 38.5 years. Among them, 39 (57%) had haemodynamic instability requiring embolisation (n=15, 22%) or multiple blood transfusions (n=24, 35%). Type A injuries predominated (n=57, 83%). The need for multiple blood transfusions was significantly associated with type C floating hip, underlining the risk of heavy bleeding with this injury. Two (3%) patients died. When management was complete, the reduction was anatomical or satisfactory for 76% (13/17) of the acetabula according to Matta's criteria (maximum residual displacement <3mm) and for 85% (56/66) of the pelvic rings according to Tornetta's criteria (maximum residual displacement <10mm). One or more complications occurred in 45 (65%) patients. After a mean follow-up of 5 years, the mean Oxford Hip Score in patients with acetabular fractures was 35.5 and the mean Majeed score in patients with pelvic ring fractures was 71.5. Only 30% of patients were able to resume physical activities at the former level and to return to their former professional activities. CONCLUSION: Type C floating hip, which combines fractures of the pelvic ring and acetabulum, carries a high risk of bleeding. Special attention should be directed to the reduction of pelvic ring fractures, to avoid malunion. Acetabular fractures that are complex in the Letournel classification carry a risk of imperfect reduction. The results of this study confirm the severity of these rare injuries and the need for specialised multidisciplinary management according to a standardised strategy that is appropriate for the haemodynamic status and type of floating hip (A, B, or C). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study.

Virtual preoperative planning of acetabular fractures using patient-specific biomechanical simulation: A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: The first patient-specific biomechanical model for planning the surgical reduction of acetabular fractures was developed in our institution and validated retrospectively. There are no prior studies showing its effectiveness in terms of reduction quality, operative duration and intraoperative bleeding. Therefore, we performed a case control study aiming to: 1) evaluate the effect of preoperative simulation by patient-specific biomechanical simulator on the operating time and intraoperative bleeding; 2) evaluate the effect of preoperative simulation by patient-specific biomechanical simulator on the quality of reduction. METHOD: All patients operated on between January 2019 and June 2019 after planning by biomechanical simulation were included in this case-control study. Each patient included was matched to 2 controls from our database (2015-2018) according to age and fracture-type. DICOM data were extracted from the preoperative high-resolution scanners to build a three-dimensional model of the fracture by semi-automatic segmentation. A biomechanical model was built to virtually simulate the different stages of surgical reduction. Surgery was then performed according to simulation data. Surgical duration, blood loss, radiological findings and intraoperative complications were recorded, analysed and compared. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included, 10 in the simulation group and 20 in the control group. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, time from accident to surgery, fracture-type and surgical approach. The mean operative time was significantly reduced in the simulation group: 113min±33 (60-180) versus 196min±32 (60-260) (p=0.01). Mean blood loss was significantly reduced in the simulation group: 505mL±189 (100-750) versus 745mL±130 (200-850) (p<0.01). However, no significant difference was found in the radiological results according to Matta's criteria, although an anatomical reduction was obtained for 9 patients in the simulation group (90%) versus 12 patients in the control group (60%) (p=0.26). A postoperative neurological complication was recorded in the control group (sensory deficit of the lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the promising results of preoperative planning in acetabular trauma surgery based on patient-specific biomechanical simulation as well as its feasibility in routine clinical practice. By providing a better understanding of the fracture and its behavior, a reduction in intraoperative bleeding and in operative duration is achieved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case-control study.

Does intraoperative 3D navigation improve SpineJack vertebral augmentation in thoracic and lumbar compression fracture?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of navigation on the positioning of the SpineJack implant in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar compression fractures. METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2019, all patients operated on for thoracic or lumbar fracture using the SpineJack device in stand-alone were included in this single-center study. The positioning of the SpineJack implant was analyzed on axial CT views by measuring the angle between the axis of the pedicle and the axis of the final implant. The relationships between implant positioning and the use of navigation or fluoroscopy, pedicle dimensions and levels of injury were analyzed. Surgical time, radiation exposure, radiological findings and complications were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included, for 103 fractured vertebrae and a total of 205 implants, 148 placed under standard fluoroscopy and 57 with the Surgivisio navigation system. For pedicle diameters≥5mm (165 implants), the positioning of the implant relative to the axis of the pedicle was significantly better in the navigation group: 2°±1.4° (range, 0-7°) in the fluoroscopy group versus 1.2°±1.1° (range, 0-5°) in the navigation group (p=0.04). There were no significant differences in reduction of vertebral kyphosis angle or mean operating time. Dose area product (DAP) was significantly higher with navigation: 4.43Gy.cm2 versus 0.47Gy.cm2 (p<0.001) and dose to the surgeon significantly lower: 0.5 versus 1.6µSv (p<0.001). No difference was found regarding complications. Subgroup analysis showed significantly greater operative time and patient irradiation in the fluoroscopy group when pedicle diameter was less than 5mm. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the interest of navigation for positioning the SpineJack implant with respect to the pedicle axis in vertebrae with pedicle diameter≥5mm. This study also confirmed the reliability of navigation and lower radiation dose to the surgeon, regardless of the fracture level. Navigation reduced operating time and patient irradiation for vertebrae with pedicle diameter<5mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study.

Minimally invasive triangular lumboiliac and iliosacral fixation of posterior pelvic ring injuries with vertical instability: Technical note.

To date, no strong consensus exists on the best way to treat posterior pelvic ring injuries when there is no neurological deficit. Various fixation methods have been described; more recently, constructs that combine lumboiliac and iliosacral fixation have been introduced. This type of fixation is mainly indicated in cases of spinopelvic dissociation with large displacement of fracture fragments in the sagittal plane. However, these techniques are associated with postoperative complications, particularly infections and severe skin complications. This led us to propose a minimally invasive lumboiliac and iliosacral fixation technique for posterior pelvic ring injuries. The procedure is done with the patient prone. It consists of pedicle screw insertion into L4 or L5 and screw fixation of the ilium with fluoroscopy guidance; intraoperative distraction can be done depending on the amount of displacement. An iliosacral screw is then inserted percutaneously to allow reduction in the transverse plane and yield a triangular construct. In the five patients that we have operated using this technique, the mean preoperative vertical displacement was 11.9±6.9mm (SD) (min 1.3, max 19.7) versus 3.7±3.2mm (min 0.3, max 6.7) postoperatively and the mean preoperative frontal displacement was 7.5±3.7mm (min 4.2, max 12.4) versus 2.5±2.0mm (min 0.3, max 4.3) postoperatively. Minimally invasive iliosacral and lumboiliac fixation is an option for treating posterior pelvic ring fractures free of neurological deficit and especially spinopelvic dissociation.

Planning acetabular fracture reduction using a patient-specific biomechanical model: a prospective and comparative clinical study.

PURPOSE: A simple, patient-specific biomechanical model (PSBM) is proposed in which the main surgical tools and actions can be simulated, which enables clinicians to evaluate different strategies for an optimal surgical planning. A prospective and comparative clinical study was performed to assess early clinical and radiological results. METHODS: From January 2019 to July 2019, a PSBM was created for every operated acetabular fracture (simulation group). DICOM data were extracted from the pre-operative high-resolution CT scans to build a 3D model of the fracture using segmentation methods. A PSBM was implemented in a custom software allowing a biomechanical simulation of the surgery in terms of reduction sequences. From July 2019 to December 2019, every patient with an operated for acetabular fracture without PSBM was included in the standard group. Surgery duration, blood loss, radiological results and per-operative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included, 10 in the simulation group and 12 in the standard group. The two groups were comparable regarding age, time to surgery, fracture pattern distribution and surgical approaches. The mean operative time was significantly lower in the simulation group: 113 min ± 33 (60-180) versus 184 ± 58 (90-260), p = 0.04. The mean blood loss was significantly lower in the simulation group, p = 0.01. No statistical significant differences were found regarding radiological results (p = 0.16). No per-operative complications were recorded. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that pre-operative planning in acetabular surgery based on a PSBM results in a shorter operative time and a reduction of blood loss during surgery. This study also confirms the feasibility of PSBM planning in daily clinical routine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II: prospective study.

EOS stereographic assessment of femoral shaft malunion after intramedullary nailing. A prospective series of 48 patients at 9 months' follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess femoral shaft malunion following anterograde intramedullary nailing, using low-dose EOS stereoradiography. The study hypothesis was that our surgical technique is associated with radiological rotation disorder rates equivalent to those reported in the literature. METHODS: All patients with unilateral femoral shaft fracture treated by anterograde nailing between January 2014 and December 2016 and followed up in our structure were included in a single-center prospective study. The main endpoint was≥15° transverse malrotation compared to the contralateral side as measured on EOS stereoradiography. Correlations between malrotation and Harris Hip and SF12 functional scores were assessed, as were risk factors for onset of shaft malunion in rotation. Forty-eight patients with a mean age of 31.4 years were analyzed at a mean 9.3 months' follow-up. RESULTS: Stereoradiographic malrotation was found in 29.2% of patients. Mean anteversion was 18.5±13.8°. In 2.1% of patients, symptomatic rotation disorder required revision surgery. No correlations emerged between transverse malrotation and functional scores (p>0.05). Risk factors for malrotation comprised multi-site fracture (p=0.04), surgeon's inexperience (p=0.04), and open reduction (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: The present radiologic malrotation rate was comparable to those reported in the literature, using the EOS stereoradiographic system, which provides precise assessment of rotation disorder following closed nailing of femoral shaft fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; prospective study without control group.

3D-imaging in percutaneous spine surgery using the Surgivisio system.

The Surgivisio system is a new generation of intraoperative 3D imaging, used in our institution for pedicle insertion in minimally invasive spine surgery since January 2018. The purpose of this technical note is to describe the Surgivisio system, its advantages and its limitations, in percutaneous spinal surgery. Results of the first year of use were analyzed, in a series of 29 patients, to evaluate accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, operative time and radiation exposure. On the Heary and Gertzbein classifications, 95.5% of pedicle screw placements (107/112) were rated as acceptable. Mean operative time was 29.3min per vertebra; mean radiation exposure per vertebra was 0.61 mSv. The Surgivisio system is an effective navigation tool for pedicle screw insertion in minimally invasive spinal surgery, with acceptable radiation exposure and operative time for each navigated vertebra. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

Tuberosity healing in reverse shoulder arthroplasty in traumatology: Use of an offset modular system with bone graft.

INTRODUCTION: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become a common treatment in displaced proximal humeral fracture (PHF) in elderly patients due to inconstant results with osteosynthesis or hemiarthroplasty. RSA allows a good anterior elevation but rotational results are more random and depend on tuberosity healing. HYPOTHESIS: Use of an offset modular system (OMS) on the prothesis improve tuberosity healing and functional results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysed radiological and clinical outcomes at least one year after the use of RSA Humelock II Reversed (Fx Solutions) after a displaced PHF Neer 3 or 4 in patients over 70 years. The first criterion was tuberosity healing with or without the use of the OMS device on radiographs. The second criterion was a clinical analysis of active range of motion (ROM), anterior elevation (AAE), external and internal rotations (ER, IR), Constant, DASH, SSV, VAS scores according to tuberosity healing. We also analysed radiological and clinical complications. RESULTS: We analysed from November 2013 to May 2018 thirty-four RSA. Mean age was 78±5,7 years, mean follow up was 18±7,2 months and the mean tuberosity healing rate was 79%. Mean ROM were: 117±24 (AAE), 18̊±18 (ER) and L2 (IR). On the first analysis, healing tuberosity with cage was present on 24 (92%) patients versus 3 (37,5%) without (p<0,005). The second analysis showed a non-significant improvement on ER, IR, Constant, DASH and SSV. Complications found were three removal of prothesis after infection, one axillary nerve lesion, one ulnar paraesthesia and one humeral loosening. CONCLUSION: The use of the OMS cage allows a better consolidation of tuberosities in a significant way but no significant clinical effects was highlighted due to a small patient number in the study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level III, retrospective cohort.