Genomic diversity of natural killer cell receptor genes in three populations.

We report the distribution of genes encoding 11 killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) and 2 CD94:NKG2 receptors, in 32 Caucasians, 67 Australian Aborigines and 59 Vietnamese. The inhibitory and the activating KIR genes were found at different frequency in the three populations. No correlation was found between the polymorphism of the KIR genes and the HLA specificities of the tested samples. The most significant KIR associations were 2DL2 with 2DS2; 2DL2 with 2DS3 and 3DL1 with 2DS4 in all three study groups. In Caucasians and Vietnamese 2DS2 was associated with 2DS3 and 2DS1with 3DS1. KIR 2DL1 was strongly associated with three other KIRs: 2DL3, 3DL1 and 2DS4 in Aborigines. The distribution of the KIR phenotypes was different in the three populations. The AA1 phenotype was frequent in Vietnamese (42.4%) and Caucasians (31.2%), but very rare in Aborigines (1.5%). In contrast, the BB7 phenotype was very common for Aborigines (22.4%) and was absent in the two other groups. Our data demonstrate that different associations and putative KIR haplotypes could be distinguished in different populations.

Evaluation of standard tyrosinase RT-PCR in melanoma patients by the use of the LightCycler system.

BACKGROUND: Haematogenous spread influences outcome in melanoma patients. The clinical relevance of detecting circulating melanoma cells in peripheral blood by tyrosinase mRNA RT-PCR is, however, questioned as rates of positivity considerably vary between studies. Standard tyrosinase-nested RT-PCR was here compared with a real-time PCR technique. METHODS: Forty-three blood samples from 20 stage III--IV melanoma patients were analyzed. Mononuclear cells were isolated using a Ficoll Hypaque gradient technique. Total RNA extracted by the acid guanidinum thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method was reverse transcribed using random hexamers or specific primers. Standard tyrosinase-nested PCR was performed on Touchdown machine (Hybaid) and real-time PCR on a LightCycler instrument (Roche). RESULTS: Only two samples from stage IV patients (one from random hexamers, one from antisense primers) were found tyrosinase positive with a 100% agreement between the two PCR techniques. A 10-fold dilution of the first-round products improved the PCR kinetic and the final amount of amplified product of positive samples, but not the rate of positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Efficiency of the PCR reaction can be monitored in an online fashion by the LightCycler instrument allowing technical improvements. However, tyrosinase mRNA RT-PCR cannot be yet considered as a useful technique in the monitoring of melanoma patients.