Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 15(4): 101771, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615579

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The heterogeneity in health and functional ability among older patients makes the management of cancer a unique challenge. The Geriatric Oncology Program at the University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical Center (BWMC) was created to optimize cancer management for older patients. This study aimed to assess the benefits of the implementation of such a program at a community-based academic cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed patients aged ≥80 years presenting to the Geriatric Oncology Program between 2017 and 2022. A multidisciplinary team of specialists collectively reviewed each patient using geriatric-specific domains and stratified each patient into one of three management groups- Group 1: those deemed fit to receive standard oncologic care (SOC); Group 2: those recommended to receive optimization services prior to reassessment for SOC; and Group 3: those deemed to be best suited for supportive care and/or hospice care. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 233 patients, of which 76 (32.6%) received SOC, 43 (18.5%) were optimized, and 114 (49.0%) received supportive care or hospice referral. Among the optimized patients, 69.8% were deemed fit for SOC upon re-evaluation following their respective optimization services. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Clinical Frailty Scale (CSHA-CFS) score was implemented in 2019 (n = 90). Patients receiving supportive/hospice care only had an average score of 5.8, while the averages for those in the optimization and SOC groups were 4.6 and 4.1, respectively (p ≤0.001). Patients receiving SOC had the longest average survival of 2.71 years compared to the optimization (2.30 years) and supportive care groups (0.93 years) (p ≤0.001). For all patients that underwent surgical interventions post-operatively, 23 patients (85%) were discharged home and four (15%) were discharged to a rehabilitation facility. DISCUSSION: The present study demonstrates the profound impact that the complexities in health status and frailty among older individuals can have during cancer management. The Geriatric Oncology Program at BWMC maximized treatment outcomes for older adults through the provision of SOC therapies and optimization services, while also minimizing unnecessary interventions on an individual patient-centric level.


Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment , Geriatrics , Medical Oncology , Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Male , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Frailty/therapy
2.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 45(1): 9-15, 2019 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30653232

ABSTRACT

Polypharmacy, defined as the use of five or more medications, is becoming increasingly prevalent in older adults throughout the United States. Depre-scribing, along with the use of existing tools, such as the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria, can help guide health care providers in reducing the risks associated with polypharmacy such as side effects and drug interactions. The framework of deprescribing and the use of existing guidelines and resources are valuable in guiding health care providers in addressing polypharmacy. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(1), 9-15.].


Subject(s)
Deprescriptions , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Geriatrics/methods , Guidelines as Topic , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Polypharmacy , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List/standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States
3.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 43(4): 9-14, 2017 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28358971

ABSTRACT

The current quality improvement initiative evaluated the medication reconciliation process within select nursing homes in Washington, DC. The identification of common types of medication discrepancies through monthly retrospective chart reviews of newly admitted patients in two different nursing homes were described. The use of high-risk medications, namely antidiabetic, anticoagulant, and opioid agents, was also recorded. A standardized spreadsheet tool based on multiple medication reconciliation implementation tool kits was created to record the information. The five most common medication discrepancies were incorrect indication (21%), no monitoring parameters (17%), medication name omitted (11%), incorrect dose (10%), and incorrect frequency (8%). Antidiabetic agents in both sites were the most used high-risk medication. This initiative highlights that medication discrepancies on admission are common in nursing homes and may be clinically impactful. More attention needs to be given to work flow processes to improve medication reconciliation considering the increased risk for adverse drug events and hospitalizations. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing and Mental Health Services, 43(4), 9-14.].


Subject(s)
Geriatric Nursing/standards , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Reconciliation/statistics & numerical data , Medication Reconciliation/standards , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/standards , Quality Improvement/standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , District of Columbia , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL