Evaluation on Surface Characteristics, Accuracy, and Dimensional Stability of Tooth Preparation Dies Fabricated by Conventional Gypsum and 3D-Printed Workflows.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surface characteristics, accuracy (trueness and precision), and dimensional stability of tooth preparation dies fabricated using conventional gypsum and direct light processing (DLP), stereolithography (SLA), and polymer jetting printing (PJP) techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gypsum preparation dies were replicated according to the reference data and imported into DLP, SLA, and PJP printers, and the test data were obtained by scanning after 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, and 42 days. After analyzing the surface characteristics, a best-fit algorithm between the test and the reference data was used to evaluate the accuracy and dimensional stability of the preparation dies. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test or Kruskal-Wallis H test (α = .05). RESULTS: Compared with the gypsum group (3.61 ± 0.59 µm), the root mean square error (RMSE) values of the SLA group (5.33 ± 0.48 µm) was rougher (P < .05), the PJP group (2.43 ± 0.37 µm) was smoother (P < .05), and the DLP group (2.92 ± 0.91 µm) had no significant difference (P > .05). For trueness, the RMSE was greater in the PJP (34.90 ± 4.91 µm) and SLA (19.01 ± 0.95 µm) groups than in the gypsum (16.47 ± 0.47 µm) group (P < .05), and no significant difference was found between the DLP (17.10 Å} 1.77 µm) and gypsum groups. Regarding precision, the RMSE ranking was gypsum = DLP = SLA < PJP group. The RMSE ranges in the gypsum, DLP, PJP, and SLA groups at different times were 6.79 to 8.86 µm, 5.44 to 10.17 µm, 10.16 to 11.28 µm, and 10.94 to 32.74 µm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although gypsum and printed preparation dies showed statistically significant differences in surface characteristics, accuracy, and dimensional stability, all tooth preparation dies were clinically tolerated and used to produce fixed restorations.

Effect of cement gap and drill offset on the marginal and internal fit discrepancies of crowns designed with different tooth preparations.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of cement gap and drill offset on the marginal and internal fit discrepancies of crowns designed with different tooth preparations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five tooth preparations were constructed, and crowns with different cement gaps and drill offsets were obtained. Then, best-fit alignment was performed on the crowns with the corresponding tooth preparations, and the fit discrepancies were expressed by color-coded difference images and root mean square (RMS) values. The RMS values of each group were analyzed by the rank-based Scheirer-Ray-Hare test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The color segments in the sharp line angles area of the Sharp line angles group changed significantly before and after the drill offset. The cement gap had a significant effect on the marginal, internal, or overall fit discrepancies of the five design groups (P < 0.001), while the drill offset had a significant effect on the marginal fit discrepancies of the Shoulder-lip group and the internal or overall fit discrepancies of the Sharp line angles group (P < 0.001). Additionally, the interaction effect between cement gap and drill offset was significant for the marginal fit discrepancies of the Shoulder-lip group and the internal or overall fit discrepancies of the Sharp line angles group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The cement gap and drill offset had a significant adverse effect on the marginal or internal fit discrepancies of the crowns designed with the shoulder-lip and sharp line angles designs. Tooth preparation designs with intense curvature changes such as shoulder-lip and sharp line angles should be avoided clinically.

Effect of different tooth preparation designs on the marginal and internal fit discrepancies of cobalt-chromium crowns produced by computer-aided designing and selective laser melting processes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of five different tooth preparation designs on the marginal and internal fit discrepancies of cobalt-chromium (CoCr) crowns produced by computer-aided designing (CAD) and selective laser melting (SLM) processes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five preparation data were constructed, after which design crowns were obtained. Actual crowns were fabricated using an SLM process. After the data of actual crowns were obtained with structural light scanning, intaglio surfaces of the design crown and actual crown were virtually superimposed on the preparation. The fit-discrepancies were displayed with colors, while the root means square was calculated and analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey's test or Kruskal-Wallis test (α =.05). RESULTS: The marginal or internal color-coded images in the five design groups were not identical. The shoulder-lip and sharp line angle groups in the CAD or SLM process had larger marginal or internal fit discrepancies compared to other groups (P < .05). In the CAD process, the mean marginal and internal fit discrepancies were 10.0 to 24.2 µm and 29.6 to 31.4 µm, respectively. After the CAD and SLM processes, the mean marginal and internal fit discrepancies were 18.4 to 40.9 µm and 39.1 to 47.1 µm, respectively. The SLM process itself resulted in a positive increase of the marginal (6.0 - 16.7 µm) and internal (9.0 - 15.7 µm) fit discrepancies. CONCLUSION: The CAD and SLM processes affected the fit of CoCr crowns and varied based on the preparation designs. Typically, the shoulder-lip and sharp line angle designs had a more significant effect on crown fit. However, the differences between the design groups were relatively small, especially when compared to fit discrepancies observed clinically.