Fit for Purpose? The Suitability of Oral Health Outcome Measures to Inform Policy.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: Oral health research and program evaluation should consider alternative outcome measures for population oral health other than the DMFT index.

Dental enamel defects and dental caries of primary teeth among Indigenous children in Western Australia.

BACKGROUND: Teeth affected with enamel defects (EDs) are at an increased risk of dental caries. In spite of improving oral health status overall in Australia, Indigenous Australians still experience higher rates of dental caries than non-Indigenous Australians. This study reports on the prevalence of EDs and dental caries experience among Indigenous children in the Kimberley region of Western Australia. METHODS: Health status of all the primary teeth (ICDAS II criteria) and the presence of EDs on index teeth (modified Dental Defects of Enamel index; DDE) of young Indigenous children who participated in a 2-arm intervention trial was recorded. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the association between EDs and dental caries and effect estimates were presented as odds ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Person-level prevalence, from 237 children (mean age 3.6 years, standard deviation 1.7) assessed for EDs, was 58% and tooth-level prevalence was 24%. Teeth affected with demarcated or diffuse defects were associated with a twofold higher odds of having caries experience, odds ratio (OR) 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-3.7 and OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.7-4.0 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of EDs among young Indigenous children was associated with a higher odds of caries experience among affected teeth.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of silver diamine fluoride to divert dental general anaesthesia compared to standard care.

BACKGROUND: The aim is to perform a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of a silver diamine fluoride (SDF) protocol intervention to divert dental general anaesthesia (DGA) among Victorian children aged 2-10 years. METHODS: Data inputs were based on an Australian single-cohort 2017/18 study. Intervention costs for standard care were derived from two subgroups of children: (1) children who received standard care without DGA, and (2) children who received standard care with DGA. Two scenarios were modelled due to limited post-follow-up data: (1) children receiving SDF had standard care without DGA (base-case scenario), and (2) children receiving SDF did not receive standard care without DGA (alternative scenario). A simple decision-tree model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) estimated the incremental costs per diverted DGA. RESULTS: The probability of children requiring specialist referral and offered SDF, but the primary carer opted for DGA is 0.124 (SD 0.034), and the probability of children requiring DGA in standard care is 0.346 (SD 0.036). For both the base-case and alternative scenario, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio outcome is dominant and their cost-effectiveness being either 74.8% or 100% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SDF protocol intervention is cost-effective dental caries management option for young children where referral for DGA is considered. © 2022 Australian Dental Association.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of atraumatic restorative treatment to manage early childhood caries: microsimulation modelling.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of atraumatic restorative treatment and the Hall Technique approach (ART/HT) in managing dental caries in young children under the health provider perspective in order to explore a best-buy alternative to dental general anaesthesia (DGA). METHODS: Sixty-five observations from a randomized controlled trial were used to construct 20 000 microsimulations representing individual-level clinical outcome and costs of the DGA and ART/HT. Outcome was percentage of successfully managed cases. Costs were reported in 2020 price. Three different scenarios with different assumptions of clinical success of the DGA and the ART/HT were analysed. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was carried out. RESULTS: The ART/HT successfully managed more cases at lower cost ($557) than the DGA when the system failure of the DGA was considered. Under per protocol analysis, participants in both arms were successfully managed, but the ART/HT costed $580 less than the DGA. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the ART/HT was a dominant intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The ART/HT approach was non-inferior in managing dental caries in young children but at lower costs than the DGA. The ART/HT could be a viable option in the provision of comprehensive dental care in locations with limited access to DGA and reduce hospital admission.

Dental Restrictions to Clinical Practice during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Australian Perspective.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: The reportedly low COVID-19 transmission occurring in dental settings highlight achievements made by the dental profession. There are valid reasons to reconsider risk-based essential oral healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in Australian Aboriginal Communities: A Cluster-randomized Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The management of early childhood caries (ECC) is challenging. OBJECTIVES: A model of care based on Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and the Hall Technique (ART-HT) to manage ECC was evaluated among remote Aboriginal communities in Australia. METHODS: Aboriginal communities in the North-West of Western Australia were invited to participate and consenting communities were randomized into early or delayed intervention for the management of ECC. Children were examined at baseline and at the 11-mo follow-up. The early intervention group (test) was provided with the ART-based dental care at baseline while the delayed intervention group (control) was advised to seek care through the usual care options available within the community. At follow-up, both groups were examined by calibrated examiners, and were offered care using the ART-HT approach. Changes from baseline to follow-up in caries experience were tested using paired tests. Multivariate analysis after multiple imputation of missing data used generalised estimating equation (GEE) controlling for clustering within communities. RESULTS: A total of 25 communities and 338 children (mean age = 3.6 y, SD 1.7) participated in the study (test = 177). At follow-up, 231 children were examined (68% retention, test = 125). At follow-up, children in the test group had more filled teeth (test filled teeth = 1.2, control filled teeth = 0.2, P < 0.001) and decreased levels of decayed teeth (mean test = 0.7 fewer teeth with decay, mean control = 1.0 more tooth with decay, P < 0.001). GEE analysis controlled for baseline caries experience, age, sex, and community water fluoride levels found increased rates of untreated decayed teeth (RR = 1.4, P = 0.02) and decreased rates of filled teeth (RR = 0.2, P < 0.001) at follow-up among the control group. CONCLUSION: A model of care relying on the principles of minimally invasive atraumatic approaches enabled the delivery of effective dental services to young children (<6 y) in remote Aboriginal Australian communities resulting in increased levels of care and improved oral health. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: This cluster-randomized trial tested a multi-component model of dental care to young children with ECC in remote Aboriginal communities in Australia. The intervention, based on the atraumatic approaches using minimally invasive techniques encompassing preventive care, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and the Hall Technique (ART-HT), delivered more restorative care and reduced the incidence of caries. This model of care was more effective than available standard care and should be incorporated into mainstream service delivery programs.

Systematic Review and Quality Appraisal of Economic Evaluation Publications in Dentistry.

Economic evaluation (EE) studies have been undertaken in dentistry since the late 20th century because economic data provide additional information to policy makers to develop guidelines and set future direction for oral health services. The objectives of this study were to assess the methodological quality of EEs in oral health. Electronic searching of Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database from 1975 to 2013 were undertaken to identify publications that include costs and outcomes in dentistry. Relevant reference lists were also searched for additional studies. Studies were retrieved and reviewed independently for inclusion by 3 authors. Furthermore, to appraise the EE methods, 1 author applied the Drummond 10-item (13-criteria) checklist tool to each study. Of the 114 publications identified, 79 studies were considered full EE and 35 partial. Twenty-eight studies (30%) were published between the years 2011 and 2013. Sixty-four (53%) studies focused on dental caries prevention or treatment. Median appraisal scores calculated for full and partial EE studies were 11 and 9 out of 13, respectively. Quality assessment scores showed that the quality of partial EE studies published after 2000 significantly improved (P = 0.02) compared to those published before 2000. Significant quality improvement was not found in full EE studies. Common methodological limitations were identified: absence of sensitivity analysis, discounting, and insufficient information on how costs and outcomes were measured and valued. EE studies in dentistry increased over the last 40 y in both quantity and quality, but a number of publications failed to satisfy some components of standard EE research methods, such as sensitivity analysis and discounting.