Exenatide twice-daily does not affect renal function or albuminuria compared to titrated insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A post-hoc analysis of a 52-week randomised trial.

AIMS: To compare the effects of long-term treatment with the GLP-1RA exenatide twice-daily versus titrated insulin glargine (iGlar) on renal function and albuminuria in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. METHODS: We post-hoc evaluated renal outcome-data of 54 overweight T2DM patients (mean  ±â€¯SD age 60 ±â€¯8 years, HbA1c 7.5 ±â€¯0.9%, eGFR 86 ±â€¯16 mL/min/1.73 m2, median [IQR] urinary albumin-to-creatinine-ratio (UACR) 0.75 [0.44-1.29] mg/mmol) randomised to exenatide 10 µg twice-daily or titrated iGlar on-top-of metformin for 52-weeks. Renal efficacy endpoints were change in creatinine clearance (CrCl) and albuminuria (urinary albumin-excretion [UAE] and UACR) based on 24-h urines, collected at baseline and Week-52. eGFR and exploratory endpoints were collected throughout the intervention-period, and after a 4-week wash-out. RESULTS: HbA1c-reductions were similar with exenatide (mean ±â€¯SEM -0.80 ±â€¯0.10%) and iGlar (-0.79 ±â€¯0.14%; treatment-difference 0.02%; 95% CI -0.31 to 0.42%). Change from baseline to Week-52 in CrCl, UAE or UACR did not statistically differ; only iGlar reduced albuminuria (P < 0.05; within-group). eGFR decreased from baseline to Week-4 with exenatide (-3.9 ±â€¯2.1 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.069) and iGlar (-2.7 ±â€¯1.2 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.034), without treatment-differences in ensuing trajectory. Exenatide versus iGlar reduced bodyweight (-5.4 kg; 2.9-7.9; P < 0.001), but did not affect blood pressure, lipids or plasma uric acid. CONCLUSIONS: Among T2DM patients without overt nephropathy, one-year treatment with exenatide twice-daily does not affect renal function-decline or onset/progression of albuminuria compared to titrated iGlar. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00097500.

Gastrointestinal actions of glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies: glycaemic control beyond the pancreas.

The gastrointestinal hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) lowers postprandial glucose concentrations by regulating pancreatic islet-cell function, with stimulation of glucose-dependent insulin and suppression of glucagon secretion. In addition to endocrine pancreatic effects, mounting evidence suggests that several gastrointestinal actions of GLP-1 are at least as important for glucose-lowering. GLP-1 reduces gastric emptying rate and small bowel motility, thereby delaying glucose absorption and decreasing postprandial glucose excursions. Furthermore, it has been suggested that GLP-1 directly stimulates hepatic glucose uptake, and suppresses hepatic glucose production, thereby adding to reduction of fasting and postprandial glucose levels. GLP-1 receptor agonists, which mimic the effects of GLP-1, have been developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Based on their pharmacokinetic profile, GLP-1 receptor agonists can be broadly categorized as short- or long-acting, with each having unique islet-cell and gastrointestinal effects that lower glucose levels. Short-acting agonists predominantly lower postprandial glucose excursions, by inhibiting gastric emptying and intestinal glucose uptake, with little effect on insulin secretion. By contrast, long-acting agonists mainly reduce fasting glucose levels, predominantly by increased insulin and reduced glucagon secretion, with potential additional direct inhibitory effects on hepatic glucose production. Understanding these pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences may allow personalized antihyperglycaemic therapy in type 2 diabetes. In addition, it may provide the rationale to explore treatment in patients with no or little residual ß-cell function.

Virus-Specific CD8(+) T Cells Cross-Reactive to Donor-Alloantigen Are Transiently Present in the Circulation of Kidney Transplant Recipients Infected With CMV and/or EBV.

T cells play a dual role in transplantation: They mediate transplant rejection and are crucial for virus control. Memory T cells generated in response to pathogens can cross-react to alloantigen, a phenomenon called heterologous immunity. Virus-specific CD8(+) T cells cross-reacting to donor-alloantigen might affect alloimmune responses and hamper tolerance induction following transplantation. Here, we longitudinally studied these cross-reactive cells in peripheral blood of 25 kidney transplant recipients with a cytomegalovirus and/or Epstein-Barr virus infection. Cross-reactive T cells were identified by flow cytometry as virus-specific T cells that proliferate in response to donor cells in a mixed-lymphocyte reaction. In 13 of 25 patients, we found cross-reactivity to donor cells for at least 1 viral epitope before (n = 7) and/or after transplantation (n = 8). Cross-reactive T cells were transiently present in the circulation, and their precursor frequency did not increase following transplantation or viral infection. Cross-reactive T cells expressed interferon-γ and CD107a in response to both alloantigen and viral peptide and resembled virus-specific T cells in phenotype and function. Their presence was not associated with impaired renal function, proteinuria, or rejection. In conclusion, virus-specific T cells that cross-react to donor-alloantigen are transiently detectable in the circulation of kidney transplant recipients.

Acute renal haemodynamic effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide in healthy overweight men.

AIMS: To determine the acute effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist exenatide and the involvement of nitric oxide (NO) on renal haemodynamics and tubular function, in healthy overweight men. METHODS: Renal haemodynamics and tubular electrolyte handling were measured in 10 healthy overweight men (aged 20-27 years; BMI 26-31 kg/m(2)) during intravenous administration of placebo (saline 0.9%), exenatide, and exenatide combined with the NO-synthase inhibitor L-N(G)-monomethyl arginine (L-NMMA). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were determined by inulin and para-aminohippurate clearance techniques, respectively, based on timed urine sampling. Glomerular hydrostatic pressure and vascular resistance of afferent and efferent renal arterioles were calculated using the Gomez formulae. Urinary electrolytes, osmolality and pH were also measured. RESULTS: GFR increased by a mean of 18 ± 20 (+20%; p = 0.021) and ERPF increased by a median (interquartile range) of 68 (26; 197) ml/min/1.73 m(2) (+14%; p = 0.015) during exenatide infusion versus placebo. During L-NMMA infusion, exenatide increased GFR by mean 8 ± 12 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (+9%; p = 0.049). Exenatide increased estimated glomerular pressure by +6% (p = 0.015) and reduced afferent renal vascular resistance by -33% (p = 0.038), whereas these effects were blunted during L-NMMA infusion. Exenatide increased absolute and fractional sodium excretion, urinary osmolality and urinary pH. The tubular effects of exenatide were not altered by concomitant L-NMMA infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Exenatide infusion in healthy overweight men acutely increases GFR, ERPF and glomerular pressure, probably by reducing afferent renal vascular resistance, and at least partially in an NO-dependent manner. As baseline renal haemodynamics in patients with type 2 diabetes differ from those in healthy individuals, clinical studies on the renal effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists are warranted.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide has no acute effect on MRI-measured exocrine pancreatic function in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial.

AIMS: To investigate the effect of infusion of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist exenatide on exocrine pancreatic function. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study in 12 male patients with type 2 diabetes, treated with oral glucose-lowering agents. On two separate occasions, exenatide or placebo (saline 0.9%) were administered intravenously, in randomized order. Exocrine pancreatic function was measured using secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. The primary outcome measure was defined as secretin-stimulated pancreatic excretion volume. Secondary outcome measures were maximum secretion speed and the time to reach this maximum. In addition, changes in pancreatic duct (PD) diameter were measured. RESULTS: Exenatide did not change secretin-stimulated pancreatic excretion volume, as compared with placebo (mean ± standard error of the mean 142.2 ± 15.6 ml vs 142.6 ± 8.5 ml, respectively; p = 0.590). Also, exenatide did not change the maximum secretion speed (33.1 ± 1.4 vs 36.9 ± 2.2; p = 0.221), nor the time to reach this maximum (both 4 min 30 s). No differences in PD diameter were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of exenatide did not directly influence MRI-measured exocrine pancreatic excretion in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although long-term studies are warranted, these findings suggest that potential adverse pancreatic effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists are not mediated by changes in exocrine pancreatic secretion.