Involvement of the tuberomammillary nucleus of the hypothalamus in the modulation of nociception and joint edema in a model of monoarthritis.

AIMS: Investigate the involvement of the histaminergic projections from tuberomammillary nucleus (TMN) to the spinal cord in the modulation of nociception and peripheral edema in a model of monoarthritis. MAIN METHODS: Subacute monoarthritis was induced by an intraarticular injection of carrageenan followed by LPS 72 h later. Disability and joint edema were assessed at the 3rd hour after LPS and at every hour up to 6 h. KEY FINDINGS: Intrathecal administration of histamine potentiated joint incapacitation and edema, while the H1R antagonist cetirizine decreased both. The H3R agonist immepip decreased both incapacitation and edema, while the H3R antagonist thioperamide had the opposite effect. The microinjection of glutamate into the ventral TMN (vTMN) caused an increase of incapacitation and articular edema, whereas the blockade of this nucleus by cobalt chloride inhibited both parameters. Intrathecal administration of cetirizine prevented the increase of incapacitation and joint edema caused by glutamate microinjection into the vTMN. Similarly, an intrathecal injection of the NKCC1 cotransporter inhibitor bumetanide prevented the effects of glutamate microinjection into the vTMN, whereas coadministration of histamine with bumetanide only inhibited the potentiation of joint edema. A microinjection of orexin B into the vTMN potentiated incapacitation and joint edema, while coadministration of the OX1/2 receptor antagonist almorexant with orexin B did not. SIGNIFICANCE: These data support the notion that TMN participates in the modulation of a peripheral inflammatory process by means of histaminergic projections to the spinal cord, and the hypothalamus may trigger TMN activation by means of glutamate and orexin.

Efficacy and security of ivermectin given orally to rats naturally infected with Syphacia spp., Giardia spp. and Hymenolepis nana.

The results of this study show that the oral administration of ivermectin (48 mg/L) repeatedly for 72 h used in accordance with the present protocol is a safe and highly effective treatment for Giardia spp. and Hymenolepis nana in laboratory rat colonies. The drug can be easily and safely administered using drinking water. This simple regimen should control pinworm infection (Syphacia muris), a problem that can be endemic in laboratory colonies. Experiments using healthy animals are likely to generate more consistent results, thereby requiring a reduced number of animals per group.

Dependency of nociception facilitation or inhibition after periaqueductal gray matter stimulation on the context.

Anxiety and/or fear can alter the nociceptive response in humans and animals. Slight stimulation of the dorsal periaqueductal gray matter (DPAG) produced anxiety/fear-related behaviour and hyponociception in escapable, non-anxiogenic nociceptive models. Our aim was to investigate the role of the DPAG in models of persistent, anxiogenic nociception. GLY (1, 10, 20, and 80 nmol/0.3 microl/60s) was injected into the DPAG of rats, 5 min before formalin (2%/50 microl) injection either into the knee-joint or hind paw. In the knee-joint incapacitation test, GLY caused hypernociception at lower doses and hyponociception at higher doses. In the paw shacking test, GLY produced only hypernociception with the higher dose. Co-injecting GLY with 7-chlorokynurenic acid (7-CLK) or (+/-)-3-amino-1-hydroxy-2-pyrrolidone (HA-966) completely prevented the GLY effects in incapacitation and paw shacking tests, respectively. GLY injections outside the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) did not change the nociception. Behavioural analysis indicated that formalin paw injection produced higher stress signals than knee-joint injection, as diminished exploratory behaviour, and stereotypy. The results suggest that activation of the DPAG through the GLY(B)/NMDA receptor is able to produce either facilitation or inhibition of nociception depending on the nociceptive context.

Antiinflammatory effects of etoricoxib alone and combined with NSAIDs in LPS-induced reactive arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs constitute the primary therapeutic approach in reactive arthritis. Here, we compared etoricoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, with other cyclooxygenase inhibitors on articular incapacitation, edema, leukocyte migration, and gastric damage, in a model of LPS-induced reactive arthritis in rats. METHODS: E. coli Lipopolysaccharide was injected into a carrageenan-primed knee-joint of rats. The effects of etoricoxib, piroxicam, indomethacin, as well the combination of etoricoxib either with piroxicam or indomethacin, were evaluated on articular incapacitation and edema. Afterwards, the synovial leukocyte ontent and the stomach bleeding points were counted. RESULTS: Etoricoxib, piroxicam, and indomethacin dose-dependently inhibited incapacitation and edema. However, only etoricoxib inhibited both mononuclear and polymorphonuclear leukocyte migration. Piroxicam inhibited only mononuclear migration, while indomethacin even increased polymorphonuclear content in inflamed synovia. Associating etoricoxib with either subeffective doses of piroxicam or indomethacin did not enhance the hyponociceptive or the antiedematogenic effect, but prevented the anti-leukocyte migration effect and increased gastric damage. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that the selective COX-2 inhibitor etoricoxib could be a better option than non-selective COX inhibitors, since it presented a potent inhibitory effect on the clinical signals and also a potent inhibition on cell migration.

Activation of dorsal periaqueductal gray by glycine produces long lasting hyponociception in rats without overt defensive behaviors.

Electrical or glutamate stimulation of the dorsal periaqueductal gray matter (DPAG) of rats induces overt defensive behavior, such as freezing or flight, and hyponociception, while glycine and D-serine, a specific NMDA/GLY(B)-site ligand, produced only subtle defensive behavior related to risk assessment and avoidance from the open arms in the elevated plus-maze test. In order to verify whether the GLY(B) site in the DPAG could also be involved in hyponociception, glycine (GLY; 10, 20, 50, and 80 nmol/0.3 microl) and (+/-)-3-amino-1-hydroxy-2-pyrrolidone (HA966; 10 nmol/0.3 microl), a GLY(B)-site antagonist, were microinjected in rats submitted to the radiant heat-induced tail-flick test. GLY increased tail-flick latencies in a dose-dependent way. This hyponociceptive effect was completely reversed by co-administration with HA966. GLY given in the deep layer of superior colliculus did not produce changes in tail-flick latencies. Therefore, the results suggest that the activation of GLY(B) receptors in the DPAG is also involved in the hyponociception elicited by this brain area.

The L-arginine/nitric oxide/cyclic-GMP pathway apparently mediates the peripheral antihyperalgesic action of fentanyl in rats.

There are only a few studies on the molecular mechanisms underlying the peripheral antihyperalgesic effect of opioids. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular bases of the peripheral antihyperalgesic effect of fentanyl in a model of prostaglandin-induced chemical hyperalgesia. Prostaglandin E2 (1.4 nmol) injected into one hind paw of male Wistar rats (200-250 g, N = 6 in each experimental or control group) pretreated with indomethacin (2.5 mg/kg) potentiated the nocifensive response to formalin (1%) injection made 60 min later. Drugs applied locally 30 min after prostaglandin E2 induced the following effects: fentanyl (0.1-1.0 nmol) caused a dose-dependent reversal of the hyperalgesic state, naloxone (2 nmol) co-injected with fentanyl (1 nmol) completely reversed the antihyperalgesic effect, Nomega-nitro-L-arginine (NOARG, 0.05-0.2 mol) in combination with fentanyl (1.0 nmol) caused a dose-dependent inhibition of the antihyperalgesic effect of fentanyl, co-administration of L-arginine (0.5 mol) with NOARG (0.2 mol) plus fentanyl (1.0 nmol) fully restored the antihyperalgesic effect, and the cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor UK-114,542-27 (5-[2-ethoxy-5-(morpholinylacetyl) phenyl]-1,6-dihydro-1-methyl-3-propyl-7H-pyrazolo [4,3-d]-pyrimidin-7-one methanesulfonate monohydrate; 0.5-2.0 mol) potentiated a subeffective dose of fentanyl (0.1 nmol) in a dose-dependent manner. However, UK-114,542-27 (2.0 mol) injected alone did not produce this antihyperalgesic effect. Systemically administered fentanyl (1.0 nmol, sc) did not cause antinociception. Taken together, these results support the view that fentanyl reverses prostaglandin E2-induced hyperalgesia, probably by activating an opioid receptor at the periphery, and furthermore the L-arginine/nitric oxide/cyclic-GMP pathway may mediate this peripheral effect of fentanyl.

The L-arginine/nitric oxide/cyclic-GMP pathway apparently mediates the peripheral antihyperalgesic action of fentanyl in rats

There are only a few studies on the molecular mechanisms underlying the peripheral antihyperalgesic effect of opioids. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular bases of the peripheral antihyperalgesic effect of fentanyl in a model of prostaglandin-induced chemical hyperalgesia. Prostaglandin E2 (1.4 nmol) injected into one hind paw of male Wistar rats (200-250 g, N = 6 in each experimental or control group) pretreated with indomethacin (2.5 mg/kg) potentiated the nocifensive response to formalin (1 percent) injection made 60 min later. Drugs applied locally 30 min after prostaglandin E2 induced the following effects: fentanyl (0.1-1.0 nmol) caused a dose-dependent reversal of the hyperalgesic state, naloxone (2 nmol) co-injected with fentanyl (1 nmol) completely reversed the antihyperalgesic effect, Nomega-nitro-L-arginine (NOARG, 0.05-0.2 æmol) in combination with fentanyl (1.0 nmol) caused a dose-dependent inhibition of the antihyperalgesic effect of fentanyl, co-administration of L-arginine (0.5 æmol) with NOARG (0.2 æmol) plus fentanyl (1.0 nmol) fully restored the antihyperalgesic effect, and the cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor UK-114,542-27 (5-[2-ethoxy-5-(morpholinylacetyl) phenyl]-1,6-dihydro-1-methyl-3-propyl-7H-pyrazolo [4,3-d]-pyrimidin-7-one methanesulfonate monohydrate; 0.5-2.0 æmol) potentiated a subeffective dose of fentanyl (0.1 nmol) in a dose-dependent manner. However, UK-114,542-27 (2.0 æmol) injected alone did not produce this antihyperalgesic effect. Systemically administered fentanyl (1.0 nmol, sc) did not cause antinociception. Taken together, these results support the view that fentanyl reverses prostaglandin E2-induced hyperalgesia, probably by activating an opioid receptor at the periphery, and furthermore the L-arginine/nitric oxide/cyclic-GMP pathway may mediate this peripheral effect of fentanyl.

Effects of endothelin-1 on capsaicin-induced nociception in mice.

The influence of endothelin-1 on nociception induced by capsaicin was assessed in the mouse hindpaw. Local endothelin-1 injection (1 to 20 pmol/paw) 30 min prior to ipsilateral injection of capsaicin (0.1 microg/paw) increased, in a graded fashion, the time spent licking the injected paw. Maximal hyperalgesia was obtained with 10 pmol/paw of endothelin-1 (capsaicin-induced hindpaw licking time increased from 43 +/- 3 s to 114 +/- 7 s, n = 6), but no hyperalgesia was evident following 30 pmol/paw of endothelin-1. The selective endothelin ET(B) receptor agonists sarafotoxin S6c (< or = 30 pmol/paw) and IRL 1620 (i.e., Suc[Glu9,Ala11,15]endothelin-1-(10-21); < or = 100 pmol/paw) failed to induce hyperalgesia. Local treatment with BQ-123 (i.e., cyclo[DTrp-DAsp-Pro-DVal-Leu] 1 nmol/paw selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist), 10 min before endothelin-1 (10 pmol/paw), fully blocked the hyperalgesic response, whereas similar treatment with the selective endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 (i.e., N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D- 1-methoxy-carboyl-D-norleucine) was ineffective. Intravenous injection of bosentan (17 and 52 micromol/kg a non-peptidic mixed endothelin ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist) or BMS 182874 (i.e., 5-[dimethylamino]-N-[3,4-dimethyl-5-isoxazolyl]-1-naphthalenesulph onamide; 10 and 30 micromol/kg; a non-peptidic selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist), 1 h before endothelin-1, inhibited its hyperalgesic effect in a graded fashion and abolished the response at the higher doses. None of the antagonists modified nociception induced by capsaicin alone or the hyperalgesia induced by local injection of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; 2 nmol/paw, 30 min before capsaicin). Hyperalgesia induced by 5-HT was abolished by simultaneous injection of endothelin-1 or the endothelin ET(B) receptor agonist IRL 1620 (each at 30 pmol/paw). Therefore, local endothelin-1 exerts a dual influence in this model: at low doses it causes endothelin ET(A) receptor-mediated hyperalgesia (i.e., it potentiates capsaicin-induced nociception), whereas at higher doses it induces an anti-hyperalgesic effect against 5-HT which seems to be mediated via distinct endothelin ET (possibly ET(B)) receptors.

Effects of endothelin-1 on inflammatory incapacitation of the rat knee joint.

This study assessed the possible local nociceptive and hyperalgesic properties of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in the rat knee-joint incapacitation test, in which animals are placed for 1 min/h on a revolving (3 rpm) metal cylinder and nociception is measured as the time the hindpaw of the injected limb was off the cylinder (i.e., paw elevation time, PET). Carrageenan (Cg; 150 micrograms/joint), E. coli LPS (1 microgram/joint), and ET-1 (120 or 240 pmol/joint) each increased PET persistently, unlike sarafotoxin S6c (120-240 pmol/joint) or PBS. ET-1 (15 and 30 pmol/joint, 30 min before) did not cause incapacitation per se but potentiated PET induced by Cg, increasing the area under the curve (AUC in arbitrary units, 0-6 h) from 105 +/- 9 to 165 +/- 10 and 169 +/- 25, respectively. Prior Cg injection (300 micrograms/joint, 72 h before) sensitized the joint to incapacitation triggered by restimulation with either Cg (300 micrograms/joint), LPS (1 microgram/joint), or ET-1 (30 pmol/joint). Treatment with bosentan (10 mg/kg i.v., 15 min before joint stimulation) did not affect PET values in naive animals to Cg or LPS, but significantly reduced the upregulated response evoked by restimulation with LPS (but not Cg), from 465 +/- 24 to 290 +/- 49 (AUC 0-12 h). Therefore, ET-1 triggers nociception and hyperalgesia in the naive knee joint of the rat, perhaps via ETA receptors. Although local endogenous ETs may not have a role in inflammatory nociception in the naive joint, they may participate in articular incapacitation induced by restimulation with LPS. This latter finding could be relevant to the etiology of pain associated with chronic arthritic diseases.

Endothelins potentiate formalin-induced nociception and paw edema in mice.

The present study investigates the influence of endothelin (ET) related peptides (0.3-30 pmol/paw) on both phases of nociception and on edema induced by intraplantar injection of formalin (0.5% in 20 microL) in the mouse hind paw. The first phase of nociception (0-5 min after injection) was significantly potentiated by simultaneous injection of either ET-1 (10 or 30 pmol/paw) or ET-3 (10 pmol/paw), but not of the selective ET3 receptor agonist sarafotoxin S6c (SRTX-c; up to 30 pmol/paw). All three peptides potentiated the second phase (10-30 min after injection) of formalin-induced nociception (at 3-30, 1-30, and 10-30 pmol/paw for ET-1, ET-3, and SRTX-c, respectively), whereas only ET-1 (10 or 30 pmol/paw) effectively enhanced edema caused by formalin (30 min after injection). Histamine also potentiated all three responses triggered by formalin, but was 30- to 100-fold less potent than ET-1. Treatment with the mixed ETA/ETB receptor antagonist bosentan (10 mg/kg i.p., 1 h beforehand) did not influence nociceptive and edematogenic responses to formalin or their potentiation by histamine (3 nmol/paw), but did inhibit the potentiations induced by ET-1 (10 pmol/paw). Thus, ET-1 potentiates formalin-induced nociception and edema in the mouse. These actions are possibly mediated via ETB and ETA receptors, respectively, but their true identity and the mechanisms involved still remain to be fully elucidated.

Bradykinin-induced knee joint incapacitation involves bradykinin B2 receptor mediated hyperalgesia and bradykinin B1 receptor-mediated nociception.

The participation of B1 and B2 types of bradykinin receptors was studied in the rat knee-joint incapacitation test. Five intra-articular successive hourly administrations of bradykinin produced progressive incapacitation, thus indicating that bradykinin induced sensitization to its own nociceptive effect. Four co-injections of bradykinin with the bradykinin B1 receptor antagonist des-Arg9-[Leu8]bradykinin were without nociceptive effect. However, a 5th injection of bradykinin alone produced intense incapacitation. The bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist HOE-140 ([D-Arg)[Hyp3,Thi5,D-Tic7,Oic8]bradykinin), or indomethacin, prevented the bradykinin-induced incapacitation. However, successive co-injections of bradykinin with prostaglandin E2, in contrast to bradykinin alone, did induce incapacitation in animals pretreated with indomethacin or HOE-140. The injection of the bradykinin B1 receptor agonist des-Arg9-bradykinin into prostaglandin E2-treated joints did induce incapacitation, although administration of the bradykinin B1 receptor agonist or prostaglandin E2 alone did not induce incapacitation. In conclusion, in ongoing articular inflammation, it is suggested that the bradykinin B1 receptor is particularly involved with nociceptor activation, while the bradykinin B2 receptor is related to nociceptor sensitization.

Mechanism of diclofenac analgesia: direct blockade of inflammatory sensitization.

Indomethacin, a typical cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, acts as an analgesic by preventing the hyperalgesia induced by prostaglandins during inflammation. Analgesics of the dipyrone type directly block the sensitization of nociceptors. In the present investigation, the analgesic effect of diclofenac was compared with that of indomethacin in two algesimetric tests which permit discrimination between the two types of analgesic: the rat knee joint incapacitation and the rat paw hyperalgesia tests. The analgesics were given either pre- or posttreatment relative to the induction of hyperalgesia with carrageenin or prostaglandin E2. In both tests intraperitoneal pretreatment with indomethacin was equally or slightly more potent than diclofenac. Posttreatment with diclofenac was more effective than posttreatment with indomethacin. This was particularly evident in the paw hyperalgesia test in which posttreatment with indomethacin was not effective while diclofenac caused dose-dependent analgesia. When nociception was induced by PGE2 in both tests, the administration of indomethacin directly into the knee joint or rat paw had no effect while diclofenac continued to cause dose-dependent analgesia. Thus, diclofenac has a direct effect on ongoing hyperalgesia in addition to its ability to block cyclo-oxygenase. Naloxone and N-methyl-nalorphine did not affect diclofenac analgesia, thus indicating that the analgesic effect of the latter is independent of a central or peripheral opioid effect. Local administration of agents which inhibit the formation of nitric oxide (NG-monomethyl-L-arginine) or inhibit the activation of guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide (methylene blue) abolished diclofenac-induced analgesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antinociception induced by intraperitoneal injection of gentamicin in rats and mice.

Intraperitoneal administration of gentamicin sulfate (5-800 micrograms/kg), but not gentamicin base (23-92 micrograms/kg) produced antinociception in rats and mice, as assessed by the tail-flick, carrageenan-induced articular incapacity tests, and hot-plate tests. The AD50 s in rats (tail-flick test) and mice (hot-plate test) were 11.48 and 147.9 micrograms/kg, respectively, but doses of 200-800 micrograms/kg were required to reduce the hyperalgesia induced in rats by carrageenan. In both species, bell-shaped dose-response curves were obtained, indicating that high doses of gentamicin had little or no effect. Non-effective doses of gentamicin failed to produce a significant increase in morphine antinociception in either rodent species. The possible involvement of N-type voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels in the mechanism of antinociception induced by gentamicin is considered.