Cardiorespiratory Responses to Acute Intermittent Hypoxia in Humans With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.

Brief exposure to repeated episodes of low inspired oxygen, or acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH), is a promising therapeutic modality to improve motor function after chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). Although therapeutic AIH is under extensive investigation in persons with SCI, limited data are available concerning cardiorespiratory responses during and after AIH exposure despite implications for AIH safety and tolerability. Thus, we recorded immediate (during treatment) and enduring (up to 30 min post-treatment) cardiorespiratory responses to AIH in 19 participants with chronic SCI (>1 year post-injury; injury levels C1 to T6; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A to D; mean age = 33.8 ± 14.1 years; 18 males). Participants completed a single AIH (15, 60-sec episodes, inspired O2 ≈ 10%; 90-sec intervals breathing room air) and Sham (inspired O2 ≈ 21%) treatment, in random order. During hypoxic episodes: (1) arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation decreased to 82.1 ± 2.9% (p < 0.001); (2) minute ventilation increased 3.83 ± 2.29 L/min (p = 0.008); and (3) heart rate increased 4.77 ± 6.82 bpm (p = 0.010). Considerable variability in cardiorespiratory responses was found among subjects; some individuals exhibited large hypoxic ventilatory responses (≥0.20 L/min/%, n = 11), whereas others responded minimally (<0.20 L/min/%, n = 8). Apneas occurred frequently during AIH and/or Sham protocols in multiple participants. All participants completed AIH treatment without difficulty. No significant changes in ventilation, heart rate, or arterial blood pressure were found 30 min post-AIH p > 0.05). In conclusion, therapeutic AIH is well tolerated, elicits variable chemoreflex activation, and does not cause persistent changes in cardiorespiratory control/function 30 min post-treatment in persons with chronic SCI.

Feasibility of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation combined with locomotor training after spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Feasibility study, consisting of random-order, cross-over study of a single intervention session, followed by a parallel-arm study of 16 sessions. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of a novel combinatorial approach with simultaneous delivery of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) and locomotor training (tsDCS + LT) after spinal cord injury, compared to sham stimulation and locomotor training (sham + LT), and examine preliminary effects on walking function. SETTING: Clinical research center in the southeastern United States. METHODS: Eight individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury (ISCI) completed the two-part protocol. Feasibility was assessed based on safety (adverse responses), tolerability (pain, spasticity, skin integrity), and protocol achievement (session duration, intensity). Walking function was assessed with the 10 m and 6 min walk tests. RESULTS: There were no major adverse responses. Minimal reports of skin irritation and musculoskeletal pain were consistent between groups. Average training peak heart rate as percent of maximum (mean(SD); tsDCS + LT: 66 (4)%, sham + LT: 69 (10)%) and Borg ratings of perceived exertion (tsDCS + LT: 17.5 (1.2), sham + LT: 14.4 (1.8)) indicate both groups trained at high intensities. Walking speed gains exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in three of four who received tsDCS + LT (0.18 (0.29) m/s) and one of four in sham + LT (-0.05 (0.23) m/s). Gains in walking endurance exceeded the MCID in one of four in each group (tsDCS + LT: 36.4 (69.0) m, sham + LT: 4.9 (56.9) m). CONCLUSIONS: Combinatorial tsDCS and locomotor training is safe and feasible for individuals with chronic ISCI, even those with considerable walking impairment. Study outcomes support the need to investigate the efficacy of this approach.

Evaluation of a Head-Tongue Controller for Power Wheelchair Driving by People With Quadriplegia.

The head-tongue controller (HTC) is a multimodal alternative controller designed for people with quadriplegia to access complex control capabilities by combining tongue and head tracking to offer both discrete and proportional controls in a single controller. In this human study, 17 patients with quadriplegia and current users of alternative controllers were asked to perform four trials of either simple driving tasks or advanced maneuvers in a custom-designed course. Completion time and accuracy were compared between their personal alternative controller (PAC) and various combinations of driving modalities with the HTC. Out of 8 subjects assigned to simple driving, the best HTC trial of 3 subjects was completed faster than their PAC for the tasks of rolling forward and turning around cones, and 5 subjects in rolling backward. Across all these subjects, the average completion time of their best HTC modality is 23 s for rolling forward, 15 s for rolling backward, and 70 s for turning around cones as compared to 19 s, 17 s, and 45 s with their PAC. For advanced driving, the course was completed faster with the HTC by 1 out of 9 subjects, while the best HTC trials of all subjects are less than 1.3 times of their best PAC completion time with an average of 170 s for the HTC and 140 s for their PAC. The qualitative feedback provided by all subjects to a post-study questionnaire scored to an average of 7.5 out of 10 which shows their interests in the HTC and acknowledgement of its usefulness for this population.

Diaphragm Pacing and a Model for Respiratory Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) can cause severe respiratory impairment. Although mechanical ventilation (MV) is a lifesaving standard of care for these patients, it is associated with diaphragm atrophy and dysfunction. Diaphragm pacing (DP) is a strategy now used acutely to promote MV weaning and to combat the associated negative effects. Initial reports indicate that DP also may promote neuromuscular plasticity and lead to improvements in spontaneous diaphragm activation and respiratory function. These outcomes suggest the need for reevaluation of respiratory rehabilitation for patients with CSCI using DP and consideration of new rehabilitation models for these patients and their unique care needs. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS: This article discusses the rationale for consideration of DP as a rehabilitative strategy, particularly when used in combination with established respiratory interventions. In addition, a model of respiratory rehabilitation and recovery (RRR) is presented, providing a framework for rehabilitation and consideration of DP as an adjuvant rehabilitation approach. The model promotes goals such as respiratory recovery and independence, and lifelong respiratory health, via interdisciplinary care, respiratory training, quantitative measurement, and use of adjuvant strategies such as DP. Application of the model is demonstrated through a description of an inpatient rehabilitation program that applies model components to patients with CSCI who require DP. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: As DP use increases for patients with acute CSCI, so does the need and opportunity to advance rehabilitation approaches for these patients. This perspective article is a critical step in addressing this need and motivating the advancement of rehabilitation strategies for CSCI patients. (See Video Abstract, Supplemental Digital Content, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A348).