Interference of the most frequent haemoglobin variants on quantification of HbA1c: comparison between the LC-MS (IFCC reference method) and three routinely used methods.

AIM: Assaying HbA1c in patients with haemoglobin variants has long been a technical challenge, despite methodological advances that have progressively limited the problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the most frequent haemoglobin variants on three routine separation methods compared with the IFCC reference method. PATIENTS: Blood samples from heterozygous patients (AS, AC, AD, AE) were analyzed using the IFCC reference method (LC-MS), and the results compared with those obtained by capillary electrophoresis (CAPILLARYS 2 Flex Piercing, Sebia) and two HPLC methods using cation-exchange (Variant II, Bio-Rad) and affinity chromatography (Ultra(2), Primus). RESULTS: HbA1c values obtained by the IFCC reference method were comparable to those obtained by the three tested methods whatever the haemoglobin variant. Mean relative biases did not exceed the threshold of 7% (above which differences are generally considered clinically significant), although some individual values were above this limit with Variant II in samples with HbS and for all three methods in samples with HbE. CONCLUSION: This comparative study of the LC-MS reference method and three field methods has demonstrated that these assays are not clinically influenced by the presence of the most common haemoglobin variants. The present results also confirm that the interpretation of HbA1c values in patients with Hb variants remains complex and depends on the assays used and should, in some cases, take into account parameters other than analytical ones (such as differences in glycation rates and half-lives of haemoglobin variants).

New HLA-DRB1*07 allele identified from microlymphocytotoxicity/SSP discrepancies.

A HLA-DRB1*07 variant allele has been identified in a cadaver kidney donor. Serological typing using monoclonal antibodies detected HLA-DR4 and HLA-DR7. HLA class II DNA typing using sequence-specific primer (PCR-SSP) polymerase chain reaction only detected DRB1*04, while sequence-specific oligonucleotide (PCR-SSO) polymerase chain reaction confirmed the presence of both DRB1*04 and DRB1*07 alleles, although two extra reactions were also found. Exon 2 of the HLA-DRB1*07 was isolated using allele-specific PCR, then cloned and sequenced. Four mutations, at positions 170 (T --> C), 171 (C --> T), 174 (C --> G), and 179 (C --> A), were observed. These mutations changed codons 57 and 60 (V --> A; S --> Y, respectively). This amino acid sequence at position 56-61 is only found in DRB1*0811.

No quantitative relationship between CR1 and Lutheran expression on erythrocytes: In(Lu) gene product is not a common regulator of CR1 expression on erythrocytes.

The density of CR1, the C3b/C4b receptor (CD35), on erythrocytes (E) (CR1/E) is genetically determined. However, the broad distribution of CR1/E within a given genotype suggests that other genetic elements might contribute to the regulation of CR1/E. In some pathological conditions, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), AIDS and hemolytic anemia, CR1 deficiency parallels the severity of the disease. When compared to healthy individuals, an accelerated decrease in CR1/E in these patients has been demonstrated, but other mechanisms interfering with CR1 density regulation during erythropoiesis might also contribute. In exceptional circumstances, CR1/E can be dramatically decreased in healthy individuals by the effect of a regulatory gene, In(Lu), that switches off various surface molecules on E, the structure genes of which are located on four different chromosomes, suggesting a transcription regulatory role for In(Lu) gene products. The hypothesis that products of this gene could physiologically regulate the surface density of all these molecules has been tested by determining Lub density on E (Lub/E) using quantitative flow cytometry. Lub antigenic sites were then compared to CR1/E among healthy individuals of the different CR1 density phenotypes, SLE patients with and without CR1 deficiency, and an exceptional SLE patient totally lacking CR1/E and reticulocytes. No quantitative relationship was found between CR1 and Lub expression in either normal or pathological conditions. These data establish that In(Lu) products are not involved in normal or pathological CR1 density regulation.