Retrospective Study Comparing Topography-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized LASIK Procedures in a Single Center.

Purpose: To compare visual outcomes of eyes that had laser refractive surgery with the Contoura Phorcides treatment plan and eyes that had laser refractive surgery with the wavefront-optimized treatment plan using the same laser. Methods: Retrospective chart review of clinical outcomes of eyes that had either Contoura with Phorcides (CP) or wavefront-optimized (WFO) corneal refractive procedures using the Wavelight EX500 (Alcon Vision, LLC). Data were collected and compared for uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refraction, change in postoperative UDVA compared to preoperative CDVA, and change in postoperative CDVA compared to preoperative CDVA. Results: Total eyes included were 348, with 227 in the CP Group and 121 in the WFO Group. Post-operatively, there was a significantly higher percentage of eyes in the CP Group that were 20/16 or better compared to the WFO Group (57%, 129 eyes, and 17%, 21 eyes, respectively; p < 0.001). The percentage of eyes that gained 1 or more Snellen lines of UDVA compared to preoperative CDVA was higher in the CP Group (47%; 107 eyes) compared to the WFO Group (12%; 14 eyes), which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Differences in refraction were statistically significant. Conclusion: Topography-guided and wavefront-optimized treatment profiles both provided excellent refractive results. A higher percentage of eyes that were treated using Contoura with Phorcides achieved 20/16 or better unaided distance vision compared to eyes receiving a wavefront-optimized treatment plan.

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a common procedure performed to reshape the cornea (transparent part of the eye) and provide clear, spectacle-free vision. There are many different technologies available for surgeons to choose a treatment plan. One of the most popular is called wavefront-optimized LASIK (WFO), which takes into account the curvature of the cornea. Recently, topography-guided LASIK treatment plans that incorporate a proprietary planning software (Contoura Phorcides) have been available that can factor in the individualized surface elevation characteristics of the cornea. The purpose of this study was to compare visual outcomes in patients that had LASIK with the Contoura Phorcides treatment plan to patients that had LASIK with the WFO treatment plan. The results of this study suggest that both treatment profiles both provided excellent refractive results. In addition, a higher percentage of eyes that were treated using Contoura with Phorcides achieved 20/16 or better unaided distance vision compared to eyes receiving a WFO treatment plan.

Clinical outcomes after topography-guided LASIK: comparing results based on a new topography analysis algorithm with those based on manifest refraction.

PURPOSE: To compare short-term refractive and visual acuity outcomes after topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) planned with a new topography analysis system to those based on the manifest refraction. SETTING: Four clinical sites in the United States. DESIGN: Double-arm, nonmasked, nonrandomized retrospective chart review. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of postoperative refraction and visual acuity at least 2 months after uneventful LASIK using the Contoura Vision algorithm on the WaveLight Topolyzer VARIO laser. One arm comprised eyes treated using the manifest refraction (manifest), while the other included eyes treated with an ablation profile determined by the Phorcides Analytic Engine (analytic). RESULTS: Clinical results from a matched group of 317 manifest eyes and 323 analytic eyes were available for analysis. Residual refractive results, both sphere and cylinder, were similar between groups. However, significantly more eyes had 20/16 or better (-0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (62.5% analytic, 41.3% manifest) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (77.1% analytic, 51.4% manifest) in the analytic group. All eyes but 1 had a CDVA of 20/20 or better postoperatively. The number of patients with a UDVA better than their preoperative CDVA was significantly higher in the analytic group (36.5%) relative to the manifest group (23.0%). No eye in either group lost more than 1 line of CDVA; significantly more eyes in the analytic group (42.7%) gained 1 or more lines of CDVA relative to the manifest group (30.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Using the Phorcides Analytic Engine for topography-guided surgery planning increased the likelihood of 20/16 UDVA and CDVA relative to using the manifest refraction.

Prospective, randomized trial of diclofenac and ketorolac after refractive surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of diclofenac and ketorolac in relieving corneal pain after refractive surgery, and determine if there is a difference in stinging on instillation. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomized prospectively to postoperative diclofenac in one eye and ketorolac in the other. Patients and surgeon did not know which medications were used. Ocular postoperative pain and discomfort on instillation of medication were measured after radial keratotomy with a visual analog scale and a questionnaire. RESULTS: Both medications were highly effective in relieving pain. There was no significant difference in pain relief, or stinging on instillation (P = .29). CONCLUSION: There was no statistical difference in the effectiveness of the medications on pain relief, or in stinging on instillation.