Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage from Scrotum Secondary to Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Migration.

Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts are a common neurosurgical procedure used to treat hydrocephalus. Despite their efficacy, many shunts fail and require revisions. The most common causes of shunt failure include obstruction, infection, migration, and perforation. Extraperitoneal migrations require urgent attention. We present a case of migration to the scrotum, a unique complication that may be present in young patients due to the presence of a patent processus vaginalis. Here, we discuss a case of a 16-month-old male patient with a VP shunt presenting with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage from his scrotum after an indirect hernia repair. This case represents an important reminder for physicians about the sequelae associated with VP shunt complications, particularly extraperitoneal migration, and brings awareness to the underlying factors that may increase this risk.

Techniques for Safe Removal of Spinal Cord Stimulation Paddle Leads.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a safe neuromodulatory treatment used to treat failed back surgery syndrome, chronic neuropathic pain, and complex regional pain syndrome. Despite its efficacy, some patients fail to achieve pain relief and elect to undergo removal of SCS paddle leads. The safety and best practices of these procedures have not been defined. OBJECTIVE: In this article, we describe our technique and complication rate in a series of SCS paddle removals. METHODS: All patients who underwent SCS paddle removal at the Albany Medical Center between 2011 and 2020 were identified. Medical charts were reviewed for demographic data, operative technique, and incidence of complications within 30 days of the procedure. RESULTS: Thirty-two (91%) patients underwent a thoracic paddle removal, whereas 3 (9%) underwent a cervical paddle removal. All cases underwent preoperative imaging with computed tomography or MRI, and all cases were performed with neuromonitoring and fluoroscopy. The technique required for paddle removal depended on the extent of local scar formation and ranged from soft tissue dissection to additional laminectomy at an adjacent level. Cases took on average 2 ± 0.09 hours with 23.21 ± 4.29 cc blood loss. Two patients had superficial infections, which were cleared with 1 week of oral antibiotics. There were no other adverse events. CONCLUSION: Thirty-five patients successfully underwent paddle removal with the minor complications reported. In this article, we show that by using neuromonitoring, fluoroscopy, and the techniques described, SCS paddle removal can be performed with minimal risk.

Developing a fast-track discharge protocol for patients with cerebral aneurysms treated via neuroendovascular techniques.

INTRODUCTION: As we emerge from the current pandemic, hospitals, staff, and resources will need to continue to adjust to meet ongoing healthcare demands. Lessons learned during past shortages can be used to optimize peri-procedural protocols to safely improve the utilization of hospital resources. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent elective endovascular intracranial aneurysm treatment was performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with patients who were able to be discharged within 24 h of elective procedures. Rates of complications (particularly readmission) were determined. RESULTS: 330 patients underwent elective endovascular aneurysm treatment with 86 (26.1%) discharged within 24 h. Factors associated with earlier discharge included procedure years (2019-2021) and male sex. Patients were more likely to be discharged later (after 24 h) if they underwent stent-coil embolization or flow-diversion. There was no association between discharge timing and likelihood of readmission. DISCUSSION: Our review highlights the safety of earlier discharge and allowed us to prepare a fast-track protocol for same-day discharge in these patients. This protocol will be studied prospectively in the next phase of this study. As we gain more comfort with emerging, minimally invasive endovascular therapies, we hope to safely achieve same-day discharge on a protocolized and routine basis, reducing the demand of elective aneurysm treatments on our healthcare system. CONCLUSION: We retrospectively demonstrate that early discharge following elective aneurysm treatment is safe in our cohort and provide a fast-track pathway based on these findings for other centers developing similar protocols.

Revision and Replacement of Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Leads.

OBJECTIVES: Paddle leads for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) offer more efficient energy delivery and advantages in some patients. However, there is concern for how safely SCS paddles can be replaced once previously implanted because of scar tissue and the relative vulnerability of the thoracic cord. In this study, we share our experience on SCS paddle replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants who underwent SCS replacement at Albany Medical Center between 2011 and 2020 were identified. The medical records were reviewed for demographic data and information regarding initial complications, reason for removal or revision, subsequent complications of replacement surgery and its timing, and whether the implant was ultimately removed. Percutaneous lead replacement cases performed over the same period were used as a comparison group. RESULTS: A total of 1265 patients were identified to have had an SCS-related procedure based on billing codes. Of these, 73 involved replacement of epidural leads (51 paddles, 22 percutaneous). Most paddles (48/51) were replaced at the time of removal. A total of 30 of the 51 paddle replacements required additional lamina removal. Re-operations that occurred more than one year after initial implant were significantly more likely to require additional bone removal (p < 0.001). Paddle re-operations lasted in general 1.7 ± 0.2 hours and had 35 ± 5 mL of blood loss, whereas percutaneous operations lasted 1.3 ± 0.2 hours and had 12.5 ± 2 mL of blood loss. Despite the invasive nature of paddle replacement, there was no difference in complications (p = 0.23) compared with that in percutaneous leads. CONCLUSIONS: This study characterizes the safety profile of SCS paddle replacement surgeries. Here, we demonstrate that the replacement of paddle leads at the time of removal, with additional lamina removal if needed because of scar, is associated with low rates of complications. This validates the feasibility and low-risk profile of replacing paddle leads when clinically indicated for experienced surgeons with specialization in SCS.

Biomarkers Predictive of Extubation and Survival of COVID-19 Patients.

Purpose Many patients with COVID-19 who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require prolonged periods of mechanical ventilation. Mechanical ventilation may amplify ventilator-associated complications and extend resource utilization. A better understanding of prognostic indicators could help in the planning and distribution of resources, particularly in resource-limited areas. We analyzed laboratory studies of intubated COVID-19 patients with the goal of identifying biomarkers that may predict extubation success and survival to discharge. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation between January 3, 2020, and January 7, 2020, in a single academic tertiary care center in Northeastern New York State. The electronic medical record was used to collect 14 laboratory variables at three time points: admission, intubation, and extubation (including terminal extubation) for all intubated intensive care unit (ICU) patients treated for COVID-19. Mean laboratory values were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were analyzed with the two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results Seventy-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty-three patients were male. The mean age was 61 years. The overall mortality was 50%. On admission, intubated patients who survived had significantly higher platelet counts (p=0.024), and absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC; p=0.047). Notably, ferritin (p=0.018) and aspartate transaminase (AST; p=0.0045) levels were lower in survivors. At the time of intubation, survivors again had a higher platelet count (p=0.024) and ALC (p=0.037) levels. They had a lower D-dimer (p=0.0014), ferritin (p=0.0015), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; p=0.0145), and AST (p=0.018) compared to intubated patients who died. At extubation, survivors had higher platelet count (p=0.0002), ALC (p=0.0013), and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR; p=0.0024). Survivors had lower d-dimer (p=0.035), ferritin (p=0.0012), CRP (p=0.045), LDH (p=0.002), AST (p<0.001), and ALK (p=0.0048). Conclusions Biomarkers associated with increased risk of mortality include platelet count, ALC, lymphocyte percentage, NLR, D-dimer, ferritin, C-reactive protein (CRP), AST, alanine transaminase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALK). This study provides additional evidence that these biomarkers have prognostic value in patients with severe COVID-19. The goal is to find objective surrogate markers of disease improvement or success of extubation. When considered within the larger body of data, it is our hope that a mortality risk calculator can be generated for intubated COVID-19 patients.

Treatment Strategies for Generator Pocket Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Generator site pain is a relatively common phenomenon in patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation (SCS) that complicates management and effective pain relief. This pain may be managed conservatively, with repositioning of the battery and, in some cases, with explant. Here we explore our experience with management of generator site pain ("pocket pain") in a large single-center study. METHODS: All SCS permanent implants and implantable pulse generator (IPG) placements over 9 years were reviewed. Of 785 cases, we identified 43 patients with pocket pain (5.5%). Demographics and treatments of the pocket pain cohort were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age (± SEM) of the pocket pain cohort was 46.86 ± 1.06, and there were 10/33 males/females. Females were overrepresented in pocket pain cohort (76.7%) when compared with the total SCS cohort (59.0%) (X2 = 5.93, P = 0.015). Diagnosis included failed back surgery syndrome (51.2%), complex regional pain syndrome (23.3%), and chronic neuropathic pain (25.5%). No patients improved with conservative therapy. All patients either went on to revision (n = 23) or explant (n = 20). Time from initial surgery to development of pocket pain was 7.5 months (range: 0.3-88) and from pocket pain to revision surgery was 4.5 months (range: 0.4-26). In addition, significantly more pocket pain patients (65.1%) had workers' compensation (WC) insurance compared with patients without pocket pain (24.9%) (X2 = 33.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our institutional experience, pocket pain was inadequately managed with conservative treatments. Being female and having SCS filed under WC increased risk of pocket pain. Future work will explore the nuances in device placement based on body shape and manual activity responsibilities.

Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Placement on Patients Requiring Anticlotting Therapies.

BACKGROUND: Limited studies exist to support the safety of performing neuromodulation surgeries in patients whose anticlotting medication has been held. Here, we assess the safety of performing deep brain stimulation (DBS) in this patient population. METHODS: All consecutive DBS patients who underwent lead and battery placement/revision at our institution between 2011 and 2020 were included in this Institutional Review Board-approved prospective outcomes database. We retrospectively recorded adverse events occurring within 90 days of surgery. RESULTS: The study included 226 patients who underwent 381 lead placements in 267 surgeries. Of the 267 surgeries included in this study, 176 (66%) were performed on patients not on anticoagulants and 89 (33%) cases were on patients on 1 drug. Two (0.7%) cases involved a patient taking 2 drugs. A total of 49 adverse events were seen. Thirteen occurred in patients taking anticoagulants. There was no difference in adverse event rate between patients on anticlotting medication and those not (χ2 [1] = 1.523, P = 0.2171). No clot-related sequelae occurred in any patient. Three hemorrhages occurred, all in patients not on anticoagulants. CONCLUSIONS: We found no increased risk of complications in patients routinely on anticlotting medication undergoing DBS lead placement. We show that our protocol was successful in balancing increased risks of bleeding and of thromboembolic events in this patient group.