Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent ; 11(2): 85-93, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35919483

ABSTRACT

Background: This study aimed to compare the effect of one and two sessions of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) on clinical and microbial parameters in patients with chronic periodontitis. Methods: This study was conducted on 20 patients. The dental quadrants of patients were randomly assigned to SRP at baseline (group 1), SRP at baseline and one month (group 2), SRP plus aPDT at baseline (group 3) and SRP plus aPDT at baseline and one month (group 4). Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, and bleeding on probing (BoP) were measured at baseline, and one and three months later. F. nucleatum counts were determined by PCR. ANOVA was used for the comparison of these variables between the groups. Results: In all the groups, PD reduction and CAL gain increased significantly at 1- and 3-month intervals compared to baseline (P=0.001). At three months, the difference in PD between groups 1 and 3 was statistically significant (P=0.014). CAL gain between groups 2 and 4 at one month (P=0.016) and three months (P=0.001) wasstatistically significant. Reduction in F. nucleatum counts was not significant between the four study groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: A combination of two sessions of aPDT and SRP could improve CAL gain; however, further long-term studies are necessary in this regard.

2.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants ; 24(2-3): 109-19, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25272209

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of implant design on the apex area and on stress and stress patterns within surrounding bone. METHODS: Three commercially available implants with the same diameter (3.5 mm), same length (10-11 mm), and same complement abutment were selected for modeling as follows: (1) flat apical design with light tapering degree, (2) dome-shaped apical design with light tapering, and (3) flat apical design with intense tapering in one-third of the apical area. According to human conebeam computed tomography (CBCT), the bone was modeled using a cortical thickness of 2 mm and cancellous bone. Forces of 100 N and 300 N in the vertical and 15° angle directions were applied to the entire abutment surface, and the equivalent stress and strain were calculated using finite element analysis (FEA) methods. RESULTS: In all models, stress was concentrated on the cortical bone around the implant neck; in non-axial loads, stress was concentrated on the buccal side. The maximum strain recorded was a microstrain of 7200 µm µm-1 around the apex of sample C, which also showed the highest level of stress detected in cancellous bone (4.4 MPa). We observed the pathologic overload in the apical area of sample B (with a dome-shaped apex); however, the strain value was less than that of sample C. CONCLUSION: FEA revealed that great sudden changes in diameter along the fixture increases stress and strain in peri-implant bone. Therefore, uniform tapering should be considered as a standard feature for most clinical situations, and a flat apical design, which creates a better stress and strain distribution in surrounding bone than dome-shaped bone, should also be used.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Dental Prosthesis Design , Finite Element Analysis , Mandible/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone-Implant Interface/physiology , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Dental Abutments , Elastic Modulus , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Models, Biological , Reproducibility of Results , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...