Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 22(4): 430-9, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25673303

ABSTRACT

AdVAV is a replication-deficient adenovirus type 5-vectored vaccine expressing the 83-kDa protective antigen (PA83) from Bacillus anthracis that is being developed for the prevention of disease caused by inhalation of aerosolized B. anthracis spores. A noninferiority study comparing the efficacy of AdVAV to the currently licensed Anthrax Vaccine Absorbed (AVA; BioThrax) was performed in New Zealand White rabbits using postchallenge survival as the study endpoint (20% noninferiority margin for survival). Three groups of 32 rabbits were vaccinated with a single intranasal dose of AdVAV (7.5 × 10(7), 1.5 × 10(9), or 3.5 × 10(10) viral particles). Three additional groups of 32 animals received two doses of either intranasal AdVAV (3.5 × 10(10) viral particles) or intramuscular AVA (diluted 1:16 or 1:64) 28 days apart. The placebo group of 16 rabbits received a single intranasal dose of AdVAV formulation buffer. All animals were challenged via the inhalation route with a targeted dose of 200 times the 50% lethal dose (LD50) of aerosolized B. anthracis Ames spores 70 days after the initial vaccination and were followed for 3 weeks. PA83 immunogenicity was evaluated by validated toxin neutralizing antibody and serum anti-PA83 IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). All animals in the placebo cohort died from the challenge. Three of the four AdVAV dose cohorts tested, including two single-dose cohorts, achieved statistical noninferiority relative to the AVA comparator group, with survival rates between 97% and 100%. Vaccination with AdVAV also produced antibody titers with earlier onset and greater persistence than vaccination with AVA.


Subject(s)
Anthrax Vaccines/administration & dosage , Anthrax Vaccines/immunology , Anthrax/prevention & control , Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Bacterial Toxins/immunology , Drug Carriers , Mastadenovirus/genetics , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Administration, Intranasal , Animals , Anthrax/immunology , Anthrax Vaccines/genetics , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antigens, Bacterial/genetics , Antitoxins/blood , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , Disease Models, Animal , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Genetic Vectors , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Male , Neutralization Tests , Rabbits , Respiratory Tract Infections/immunology , Survival Analysis , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Synthetic/genetics , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology
2.
Virology ; 452-453: 152-7, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24606692

ABSTRACT

Influenza infection of humans remains an important public health problem. Vaccine strategies result in a significant but only partial control (65-85%) of infection. Thus, chemotherapeutic approaches are needed to provide a solution both for vaccine failures and to limit infection in the unvaccinated population. Previously (Walsh et al., 2011; Teijaro et al., 2011) documented that sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor (S1P1R) agonists significantly protected mice against pathogenic H1N1 influenza virus by limiting immunopathologic damage while allowing host control of the infection. Here we extend that observation by documenting S1P1R agonist can control pathogenic H1N1 influenza infection in ferrets. S1P1R agonist was more effective in reducing pulmonary injury than the antiviral drug oseltamivir but, importantly, combined therapy was significantly more effective than either therapy alone.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/drug effects , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Lung/pathology , Receptors, Lysosphingolipid/agonists , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Ferrets , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/physiology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Influenza, Human/pathology , Influenza, Human/virology , Lung/immunology , Lung/virology , Male , Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptors
3.
Infect Immun ; 81(4): 1152-63, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23357384

ABSTRACT

Nonhuman primates (NHPs) and rabbits are the animal models most commonly used to evaluate the efficacy of medical countermeasures against anthrax in support of licensure under the FDA's "Animal Rule." However, a need for an alternative animal model may arise in certain cases. The development of such an alternative model requires a thorough understanding of the course and manifestation of experimental anthrax disease induced under controlled conditions in the proposed animal species. The guinea pig, which has been used extensively for anthrax pathogenesis studies and anthrax vaccine potency testing, is a good candidate for such an alternative model. This study was aimed at determining the median lethal dose (LD50) of the Bacillus anthracis Ames strain in guinea pigs and investigating the natural history, pathophysiology, and pathology of inhalational anthrax in this animal model following nose-only aerosol exposure. The inhaled LD50 of aerosolized Ames strain spores in guinea pigs was determined to be 5.0 × 10(4) spores. Aerosol challenge of guinea pigs resulted in inhalational anthrax with death occurring between 46 and 71 h postchallenge. The first clinical signs appeared as early as 36 h postchallenge. Cardiovascular function declined starting at 20 h postexposure. Hematogenous dissemination of bacteria was observed microscopically in multiple organs and tissues as early as 24 h postchallenge. Other histopathologic findings typical of disseminated anthrax included suppurative (heterophilic) inflammation, edema, fibrin, necrosis, and/or hemorrhage in the spleen, lungs, and regional lymph nodes and lymphocyte depletion and/or lymphocytolysis in the spleen and lymph nodes. This study demonstrated that the course of inhalational anthrax disease and the resulting pathology in guinea pigs are similar to those seen in rabbits and NHPs, as well as in humans.


Subject(s)
Anthrax/pathology , Anthrax/physiopathology , Bacillus anthracis/pathogenicity , Disease Models, Animal , Animals , Anthrax/mortality , Female , Guinea Pigs , Lethal Dose 50 , Male , Survival Analysis , Time Factors
4.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 19(11): 1765-75, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22956657

ABSTRACT

Appropriate animal models are required to test medical countermeasures to bioterrorist threats. To that end, we characterized a nonhuman primate (NHP) inhalational anthrax therapeutic model for use in testing anthrax therapeutic medical countermeasures according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Animal Rule. A clinical profile was recorded for each NHP exposed to a lethal dose of Bacillus anthracis Ames spores. Specific diagnostic parameters were detected relatively early in disease progression, i.e., by blood culture (∼37 h postchallenge) and the presence of circulating protective antigen (PA) detected by electrochemiluminescence (ECL) ∼38 h postchallenge, whereas nonspecific clinical signs of disease, i.e., changes in body temperature, hematologic parameters (ca. 52 to 66 h), and clinical observations, were delayed. To determine whether the presentation of antigenemia (PA in the blood) was an appropriate trigger for therapeutic intervention, a monoclonal antibody specific for PA was administered to 12 additional animals after the circulating levels of PA were detected by ECL. Seventy-five percent of the monoclonal antibody-treated animals survived compared to 17% of the untreated controls, suggesting that intervention at the onset of antigenemia is an appropriate treatment trigger for this model. Moreover, the onset of antigenemia correlated with bacteremia, and NHPs were treated in a therapeutic manner. Interestingly, brain lesions were observed by histopathology in the treated nonsurviving animals, whereas this observation was absent from 90% of the nonsurviving untreated animals. Our results support the use of the cynomolgus macaque as an appropriate therapeutic animal model for assessing the efficacy of medical countermeasures developed against anthrax when administered after a confirmation of infection.


Subject(s)
Anthrax/pathology , Anthrax/therapy , Disease Models, Animal , Primate Diseases/pathology , Primate Diseases/therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/pathology , Respiratory Tract Infections/therapy , Animals , Anthrax/diagnosis , Antibodies, Bacterial/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antigens, Bacterial/blood , Bacterial Toxins/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Brain/pathology , Female , Guideline Adherence , Macaca fascicularis , Male , Primate Diseases/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
5.
Infect Immun ; 79(1): 449-58, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21041486

ABSTRACT

Porphyromonas gingivalis is a Gram-negative obligate anaerobe that has been implicated in the etiology of adult periodontitis. We recently introduced a Drosophila melanogaster killing model for examination of P. gingivalis-host interactions. In the current study, the Drosophila killing model was used to characterize the host response to P. gingivalis infection by identifying host components that play a role during infection. Drosophila immune response gene mutants were screened for altered susceptibility to killing by P. gingivalis. The Imd signaling pathway was shown to be important for the survival of Drosophila infected by nonencapsulated P. gingivalis strains but was dispensable for the survival of Drosophila infected by encapsulated P. gingivalis strains. The P. gingivalis capsule was shown to mediate resistance to killing by Drosophila antimicrobial peptides (Imd pathway-regulated cecropinA and drosocin) and human beta-defensin 3. Drosophila thiol-ester protein II (Tep II) and Tep IV and the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) homolog Eiger were also involved in the immune response against P. gingivalis infection, while the scavenger receptors Eater and Croquemort played no roles in the response to P. gingivalis infection. This study demonstrates that the Drosophila killing model is a useful high-throughput model for characterizing the host response to P. gingivalis infection and uncovering novel interactions between the bacterium and the host.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/microbiology , Porphyromonas gingivalis/physiology , Animals , Bacterial Capsules , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Gene Deletion , Gene Expression Regulation/physiology , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Signal Transduction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...