Nationwide Retrospective Analysis of Combinations of Advanced Therapies in Patients With Parkinson Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Advanced therapies (ATs; deep brain stimulation [DBS] or pump therapies: continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion [CSAI], levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel [LCIG]) are used in later stages of Parkinson disease (PD). However, decreasing efficacy over time and/or side effects may require an AT change or combination in individual patients. Current knowledge about changing or combining ATs is limited to mostly retrospective and small-scale studies. The nationwide case collection Combinations of Advanced Therapies in PD assessed simultaneous or sequential AT combinations in Germany since 2005 to analyze their clinical outcome, their side effects, and the reasons for AT modifications. METHODS: Data were acquired retrospectively by modular questionnaires in 22 PD centers throughout Germany based on clinical records and comprised general information about the centers/patients, clinical (Mini-Mental Status Test/Montréal Cognitive Assessment, Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS], side effects, reasons for AT modification), and therapeutical (ATs with specifications, oral medication) data. Data assessment started with initiation of the second AT. RESULTS: A total of 148 AT modifications in 116 patients were associated with significantly improved objective (median decrease of MDS-UPDRS Part III 4.0 points [p < 0.001], of MDS-UPDRS Part IV 6.0 points [p < 0.001], of MDS-UPDRS Part IV-off-time item 1.0 points [p < 0.001]) and subjective clinical outcome and decreasing side effect rates. Main reasons for an AT modification were insufficient symptom control and side effects of the previous therapy. Subgroup analyses suggest addition of DBS in AT patients with leading dyskinesia, addition of LCIG for leading other cardinal motor symptoms, and addition of LCIG or CSAI for dominant off-time. The most long-lasting therapy-until requiring a modification-was DBS. DISCUSSION: Changing or combining ATs may be beneficial when 1 AT is insufficient in efficacy or side effects. The outcome of an AT combination is comparable with the clinical benefit by introducing the first AT. The added AT should be chosen dependent on dominant clinical symptoms and adverse effects. Furthermore, prospective trials are needed to confirm the results of this exploratory case collection. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that, in patients with PD, changing or combining ATs is associated with an improvement in the MDS-UPDRS or subjective symptom reporting.

Mediation of Tremor Control by the Decussating and Nondecussating Part of the Dentato-Rubro-Thalamic Tract in Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor: Which Part Should Be Stimulated?

OBJECTIVES: The dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRTT) has been found to play a major role in the mechanisms of tremor alleviation by deep brain stimulation (DBS) in essential tremor (ET). Still, the influence of the two different parts of the DRTT, consisting of crossing and nondecussating fibers, is not yet clear with respect to tremor reduction. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the crossing and the nondecussating part of the DRTT on tremor control in ET. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated 80 electrode contacts in ten patients with ET who received bilateral DBS of the Nucleus ventralis intermedius of the thalamus (VIM). Preoperatively and with patients under general anesthesia, 3T magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed, including Diffusion Tensor Imaging scans with 64 gradient directions. We calculated the course of the two parts of the DRTT based on a workflow for probabilistic fiber tracking including protocols for correction of susceptibility- and eddy current-induced distortions. Distances of electrode contacts were correlated with clinical data from neurologic single pole testing. RESULTS: Voltage- and current-steered systems were analyzed separately. Regarding postural tremor, effective contacts showed significantly lower distances to both parts of the DRTT (crossing p < 0.001, nondecussating p < 0.05) in voltage-steered systems. Regarding intentional tremor, significant results were only found for the crossing part (p < 0.01). Regarding both tremor types, effective contacts were closer to the crossing part, unlike less effective contacts. Nonlinear regression analyses using a logistic model showed higher coefficients for the crossing part of the DRTT. Multivariate regression models including distances to both parts of the DRTT showed a significant influence of only the crossing part. Analysis of current-steered systems showed unstable data, probably because of the small number of analyzed patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest an involvement of both parts of the DRTT in tremor reduction, indicating mediation of DBS effects by both fiber bundles, although the crossing part showed stronger correlations with good clinical responses. Nevertheless, special attention should be paid to methodologic aspects when using probabilistic tractography for patient-specific targeting to avoid uncertain and inaccurate results.

Structural Connectivity Patterns of Side Effects Induced by Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.

Background: Tractography based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) models the structural connectivity of the human brain. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease, but may induce adverse effects. This study investigated the relationship between structural connectivity patterns of DBS electrodes and stimulation-induced side effects. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients with Parkinson's disease treated with bilateral subthalamic DBS were examined. Overall, 168 electrode contacts were categorized as inducing or noninducing depending on their capability for inducing side effects such as motor effects, paresthesia, dysarthria, oculomotor effects, hyperkinesia, and other complications as assessed during the initial programming session. Furthermore, the connectivity of each contact with target regions was evaluated by probabilistic tractography based on DWI. Finally, stimulation sites and structural connectivity patterns of inducing and noninducing contacts were compared. Results: Inducing contacts differed across the various side effects and from those mitigating Parkinson's symptoms. Although contacts showed a largely overlapping spatial distribution within the subthalamic region, they could be distinguished by their connectivity patterns. In particular, inducing contacts were more likely connected with supplementary motor areas (hyperkinesia, dysarthria), frontal cortex (oculomotor), fibers of the internal capsule (paresthesia), and the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuitry (dysarthria). Discussion: Side effects induced by DBS seem to be associated with distinct connectivity patterns. Cerebellar connections are hardly associated with side effects, although they seem relevant for mitigating motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. A symptom-specific, connectivity-based approach for target planning in DBS may enhance treatment outcomes and reduce adverse effects. Impact statement Tractography based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging has become a prominent technique for investigating the connectivity of human brain networks in vivo. However, the relationship between structural connections and brain function is still hardly known. The present study examined the relationship between adverse behavioral effects induced by deep brain stimulation (DBS) and tractography patterns in individual brains. The results suggest that DBS-based side effects depend on the structural connections of electrode contacts rather than their location. Network-based target planning in DBS may improve treatment by avoiding side effects. Moreover, the adopted approach may serve as a paragon for investigating structure/function relationships.

Deep brain stimulation: Connectivity profile for bradykinesia alleviation.

OBJECTIVE: Subthalamic deep brain stimulation may alleviate bradykinesia in Parkinson patients. Research suggests that this stimulation effect may be mediated by brain networks like the corticocerebellar loop. This study investigated the connectivity between stimulation sites and cortical and subcortical structures to identify connections for effective stimulation. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 21 patients with Parkinson disease with bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Stimulation effectiveness in reducing bradykinesia, tremor, and rigidity was evaluated for each electrode contact in brain hemispheres contralateral to the affected hemibody. Dysarthric side effects were also examined. Probabilistic tractography based on diffusion-weighted imaging was performed in individual patient-specific brains using electrode contacts as seeds. Connectivity profiles of contacts with effective and noneffective stimulation were compared. RESULTS: Connectivity profiles of effective and noneffective contacts differed. Moreover, the connectivity profile for bradykinesia differed from that for rigidity, tremor, or dysarthria. Regarding bradykinesia, effective contacts were significantly more often connected with the ipsilateral superior cerebellar peduncle and the ipsilateral dentate nucleus, which correspond to the ipsilateral portion of the cerebellothalamocortical pathway. Rigidity was mitigated by stimulation of ascending brainstem and intralaminar thalamic connections. Tremor alleviation was related to connections with the internal capsule (anterior limb) and the pallidum. Dysarthric side effects were associated with connections to the supplementary motor area and the decussating cerebellothalamocortical pathway. INTERPRETATION: Whereas bradykinesia seems to be mitigated by stimulation of the ascending, ipsilateral cerebellothalamocortical pathway, stimulation of the descending corticopontocerebellar pathway may be ineffective. Rigidity, tremor, and dysarthric side effects seem to be influenced by different neural networks. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:852-864.