Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 143(11): 6919-6926, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37392216

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to report mid-term clinical and radiographic results after hip arthroplasty revision in Vancouver type B2 femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFx). Specifical focus of the paper is as follows: (1) the description of a standardized and reproducible surgical technique, (2) functional outcomes presentation and (3) type and number of complications and implants' survival rate analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for hip revision with non-modular tapered fluted titanium stem in patients with Vancouver type B2 femur PPFx at a single institution. At least 18 months' follow-up period was required. Harris Hip Scores and SF-12 were obtained, and radiographical follow-up was performed. Complications were reported and analyzed. RESULTS: The authors included 114 patients (114 hips) with a mean follow-up of 62.8 ± 30.6 months. All patients were treated with Wagner SL revision hip stem (Zimmer-Biomet), metal cerclage wires ± trochanteric plate. The mean HHS and SF-12 score at the last follow-up evaluation were respectively 81.3 ± 9.7 and 32.5 ± 7.6. Seventeen (14.9%) complications occurred. We observed five cases of dislocations, two of periprosthetic joint infections and six cases of new PPFx. The stem-related revision rate for any cause at the final FU was 1.7%, due to PJI. No patients underwent stem revision surgery for aseptic loosening. Fracture healed in all the included patients with a union-rate of 100%. The re-operation rate for any cause was 9.6%, with an implant survival rate for overall failure of 96.5%. CONCLUSION: The presented standard and reproducible surgical technique obtains optimal clinical and radiological results with limited complication rate at mid-term follow up. Preoperative planning as well as careful intraoperative surgical technique is of a paramount importance.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Femoral Fractures , Hip Prosthesis , Periprosthetic Fractures , Humans , Periprosthetic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Periprosthetic Fractures/etiology , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Femur/surgery , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Reoperation/methods , Prosthesis Design , Treatment Outcome
2.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 21(1): 646, 2020 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33008343

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A proper restoration of hip biomechanics is fundamental to achieve satisfactory outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). A global hip offset (GO) postoperatively reduction of more than 5 mm was known to impair hip functionality after THA. This study aimed to verify the restoration of the GO radiographic parameter after primary THA by the use of a cementless femoral stem available in three different offset options without length changing. METHODS: From a consecutive series of 201 patients (201 hips) underwent primary cementless THA in our center with a minimum 3-year follow up, 80 patients (80 hips) were available for complete radiographic evaluation for GO and limb length (LL) and clinical evaluation with Harris hip score (HHS). All patients received the same femoral stem with three different offset options (option A with - 5 mm offset, option B and option C with + 5 mm offset, constant for each sizes) without changing stem length. RESULTS: Mean GO significantly increased by + 3 mm (P < 0.05) and mean LL significantly decreased by + 5 mm (P < 0.05) after surgery, meaning that postoperatively the limb length of the operated side increased by + 5 mm. HHS significantly improved from 56.3 points preoperatively to 95.8 postoperatively (P < 0.001). Offset option A was used in 1 hip (1%), B in 59 hips (74%) and C in 20 hips (25%). CONCLUSIONS: The femur is lateralized with a mean of + 5 mm after surgery than, the native anatomy, whatever type of stem was used. Thus, the use of this 3-offset options femoral stem is effective in restoring the native biomechanical hip parameters as GO, even if 2 offset options were considered sufficient to restore GO.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Hip Prosthesis , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Biomechanical Phenomena , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/surgery , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/surgery , Humans , Lower Extremity , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 45(6): 1031-1038, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29922893

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review results and complications of our standardized surgical technique addressed exclusively to Vancouver B2 fractures. METHODS: From January 2006 to July 2016, we treated 235 consecutive patients, 47 males and 188 females, mean age at surgery of 71 ± 10 years, with periprosthetic B2 fractures. Exclusion criteria were other kind of periprosthetic fractures and other femoral fractures. The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically following our standard protocol at the last available follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 6.4 years. Radiographic evaluation was performed according to Beals and Tower's criteria and clinical evaluation was performed using the Harris Hip Score and clinical exam. RESULTS: From the starter cohort of 235, 207 patients (88.1%) were fully evaluated, while 28 were lost to follow-up. According to Beal and Tower's criteria, we found excellent results in 72 patients (34.8%), good results in 133 patients (64.3%), and poor results in 2 patients (0.9%). Mean HHS was 75 ± 9 points, with a statistically significant correlation between good functional results and better radiographic assessment (p = 0.001). The use of support plate (p = 0.008) and the acetabular revision (p = 0.002) showed a statistically significant distribution with worse radiographic results. Late complications detected were ten dislocations. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that using a standardized and reproducible surgical technique, as our technique proposed, can surely reduce surgical time, the complication rate, and the mortality rate. During acetabular evaluation, the choice of performing a cup revision must be weighed on overall patient's assessment.


Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures/surgery , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Female , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Periprosthetic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Periprosthetic Fractures/etiology , Radiography , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies
4.
Joints ; 6(2): 95-99, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30051105

ABSTRACT

Purpose Difficult primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and revision TKA may be high demanding, especially during joint exposure. Aim of this article is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of patients, who underwent TKA and revision TKA, where tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) was performed. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 79 consecutives TKAs where TTO was performed. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at their last follow-up (mean, 7.4 ± 3.7 years). Clinical evaluation included the Knee Society Score (KSS), the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and range of motion. Radiological assessment included the evaluation of radiolucent lines, osteolysis, cortical bone hypertrophy, time of bone healing of the TTO fragment, and the hardware complication. Results KSS raised from 40.7 ± 3.1 to 75 ± 4.3 ( p < 0.0001). Knee flexion increased from 78.7 ± 9.9° to 95.0 ± 9.5° ( p < 0.0001), and VAS improved from 7.9 ± 0.9 to 3.8 ± 1 ( p < 0.0001). No signs of loosening or evolutive radiolucency lines were found. Osteolytic areas around the stem were detected. No significant association was found between the implant design and the outcomes, while aseptic loosening showed significantly better results. Complications were: 4 painful hardware, 3 late periprosthetic infections, 1 extension lag of 5°, and 3 flexion lag. Conclusion Our experience suggests the use of TTO to improve the surgical approach in difficult primary TKA or revision TKA. A precise surgical technique leads to good results with low risk of complications. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

5.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 138(3): 387-399, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29359256

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is a well-established extensile approach to improve joint visualization and implant removal. Despite this, TTO is a challenging technique with a long learning curve and potential pitfalls. Complications are not infrequent, even if performing the correct surgical steps. Aim of this paper is to review the current literature about TTO, its safeness and reliability, and finally the complications rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the available English literature, considering the outcomes and the complications of TTO. The combinations of keyword were "tibial tubercle osteotomy", "total knee arthroplasty", "total knee revision", "outcomes", "complication" and "surgical approach". RESULTS: From the starting 322 papers available, 26 manuscripts were finally included. Most of the papers show significant improvements in clinical outcomes, both in primary and in revision procedures. Radiographic fragment healing is close to 100%. Related complications can range from 3.8-20%. CONCLUSION: TTO may be necessary to correct pathological tuberosity position or patella tracking. However, TTO is a challenging technique to improve the surgical approach during total knee arthroplasty. A strict surgical technique can lead to better results and to minimize complications. However, it is not clear if the improved outcome can outweigh the longer surgery and the higher risk of pitfalls.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Osteotomy/methods , Patient Outcome Assessment , Tibia/surgery , Humans , Osteotomy/adverse effects , Range of Motion, Articular , Reoperation , Visual Analog Scale
6.
Eur Radiol ; 28(6): 2345-2355, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29318429

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We used T2 mapping to quantify the effect of intra-articular hyaluronic acid administration (IAHAA) on cartilage with correlation to clinical symptoms. METHODS: One hundred two patients with clinical and MRI diagnosis of hip or knee grade I-III chondropathy were prospectively included. All patients received a standard MRI examination of the affected hip/knee (one joint/patient) and T2-mapping multiecho sequence for cartilage evaluation. T2 values of all slices were averaged and used for analysis. One month after MR evaluation 72 patients (38 males; mean age 51±10 years) underwent IAHAA. As a control group, 30 subjects (15 males; 51 ± 9 years) were not treated. MR and WOMAC evaluation was performed at baseline and after 3, 9, and 15 months in all patients. RESULTS: T2 mapping in hyaluronic acid (HA) patients showed a significant increase in T2 relaxation times from baseline to the first time point after therapy in knees (40.7 ± 9.8 ms vs. 45.8 ± 8.6 ms) and hips (40.9 ± 9.7 ms; 45.9 ± 9.5 ms) (p < 0.001). At the 9- and 15-month evaluations, T2 relaxation dropped to values similar to the baseline ones (p < 0.001 vs. 3 month). The correlation between T2 increase and pain reduction after IAHAA was statistically significant (r = 0.54, p < 0.01) in patients with grade III chondropathy. CONCLUSIONS: T2 mapping can be used to evaluate the effect over time of IAHAA in patients with hip and knee chondropathy. KEY POINTS: • T2 relaxation times change over time after hyaluronic acid intra-articular administration • T2 relaxation times of the medial femoral condyle correlate with WOMAC variation • T2 relaxation times are different between Outerbridge I and II-III.


Subject(s)
Cartilage, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Osteoarthritis, Hip/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cartilage, Articular/drug effects , Female , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...