Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Oral Oncol ; 98: 35-47, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31536844

ABSTRACT

Re-irradiation is becoming an established treatment option for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer(HNC). However, acute and long-term RT-related toxicities could dramatically impact patients' quality of life. Due to the sparse literature regarding HNC re-irradiation, data on tolerance doses for various organs at risk (OARs) are scarce. Our aim was to systematically review the clinical literature regarding HNC re-irradiation, focusing on treatment toxicity, OARs tolerance, and dose limit recommendations. Thirty-nine studies (three randomized, five prospective, 31 retrospective) including 3766 patients were selected. The median interval time between the first course and re-irradiation was 28  months (range, 6-90). In 1043 (27.6%) patients, postoperative re-irradiation was performed. Re-irradiation doses ranged from 30 Gy in 3 fractions using stereotactic technique to 72 Gy in conventional fractionation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Pooled acute and late toxicityrates ≥G3 were 32% and 29.3%, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxic effects were radionecrosis, dysphagia requiring feeding tube placement and trismus. In 156 (4.1%) patients, carotid blowout was reported. Recommendations for limiting toxicity included the time interval between radiation treatments, the fractionation schedules, and the re-irradiation treatment volumes. Cumulative dose limit suggestions were found and discussed for the carotid arteries, temporal lobes, and mandible.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Organs at Risk , Radiotherapy Dosage , Re-Irradiation , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Male , Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Re-Irradiation/adverse effects , Re-Irradiation/methods , Treatment Outcome
2.
Cancer Invest ; 31(5): 336-45, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23641913

ABSTRACT

CTLA-4 blockade with monoclonal antibodies can lead to cancer regression in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms may influence the response to anti-CTLA-4 antibodies although few data are available regarding this issue. We analyzed six CTLA-4 single nucleotide polymorphisms (-1661A > G, -1577G > A, -658C > T, -319C > T, +49A > G, and CT60G > A) in 14 Italian MM patients and 45 healthy subjects. We found a significant association between the -1577G/A and CT60G/A genotypes and improved overall survival (Pc < 0.006, Bonferroni corrected), further confirmed by the diplotype analysis (-1577 & CT60 GG-AA diplotype, p < 0.001). A positive trend toward an association between these genotypes and response to therapy was also observed.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , CTLA-4 Antigen/genetics , Melanoma/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Autoimmunity , Base Sequence , CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Case-Control Studies , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Female , Gene Frequency , Genetic Association Studies , Humans , Ipilimumab , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/secondary , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Pilot Projects , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...