Colangiocarcinoma intrahepático: factores pronósticos de recidiva y supervivencia en una serie de 67 pacientes tratados quirúrgicamente en un solo centro / Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in a series of 67 patients treated surgically at a single center

Introducción: El colangiocarcinoma intrahepático es una neoplasia primaria hepática de mal pronóstico, cuyo único tratamiento curativo es la cirugía. El objetivo de este trabajo ha sido determinar los factores pronósticos de supervivencia del colangiocarcinoma intrahepático tratado quirúrgicamente con intención curativa. Métodos: Se ha recogido una serie de 67 pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente de esta neoplasia en el Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge entre 1996 y 2017. Se han analizado los datos epidemiológicos, clínicos, quirúrgicos, anatomopatológicos, de morbilidad, de mortalidad y de supervivencia. Resultados: La morbilidad postoperatoria ha sido del 47,76% y la mortalidad postoperatoria de 1,5%. La linfadenectomía se ha asociado a mayor morbilidad. La supervivencia global ha sido de 91%; 49,2% y 39,8% a los 12, 36 y 60 meses, respectivamente, y la supervivencia libre de enfermedad de 67,2%; 32,8% y 22,4%. La morbilidad postoperatoria en forma de reintervención quirúrgica, la invasión vascular y la quimioterapia adyuvante han demostrado ser factores de mal pronóstico. La invasión vascular en el estudio anatomopatológico fue el factor de riesgo de mayor importancia en la supervivencia. Conclusiones: Este estudio recoge la experiencia de nuestro centro en el tratamiento quirúrgico del colangiocarcinoma intrahepático durante un periodo de 21 años. La linfadenectomía se ha asociado a mayor morbilidad y la afectación vascular en el estudio anatomopatológico ha sido el factor de riesgo más importante en cuanto a la supervivencia. (AU)

Introduction: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a primary liver neoplasm whose only curative treatment is surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic factors for survival of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated surgically with curative intent. Methods: Sixty-seven patients who had been treated surgically for this neoplasm were collected at Bellvitge University Hospital between 1996 and 2017. Epidemiological, clinical, surgical, anatomopathological, morbidity, mortality and survival data have been analysed. Results: Postoperative morbidity was 47.76%, and postoperative mortality was 1.5%. Lymphadenectomy was associated with increased morbidity. Overall survival was 91%, 49.2% and 39.8% after 12, 36 and 60 months, respectively, and disease-free survival was 67.2%, 32.8% and 22.4%. Postoperative morbidity (reoperation, vascular invasion, adjuvant chemotherapy) were shown to be factors for a poor prognosis. Vascular invasion in the pathological study was the most important risk factor in the survival analysis. Conclusions: This study reflects our centre's experience in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma over a period of 21 years. Lymphadenectomy was associated with increased morbidity, and vascular invasion in the pathological study was the most important risk factor in the survival analysis. (AU)

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in a series of 67 patients treated surgically at a single center.

INTRODUCTION: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a primary liver neoplasm whose only curative treatment is surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic factors for survival of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated surgically with curative intent. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients who had been treated surgically for this neoplasm were collected at Bellvitge University Hospital between 1996 and 2017. Epidemiological, clinical, surgical, anatomopathological, morbidity, mortality and survival data have been analysed. RESULTS: Postoperative study reflects our centre's experience in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma over a period of 21 years. Lymphadenectomy was associated with increased morbidity, and vascular invasion in the pathological study was the most important risk factor in the survival analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study reflects our centre's experience in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma over a period of 21 years. Lymphadenectomy was associated with increased morbidity, and vascular invasion in the pathological study was the most important risk factor in the survival analysis.

Prognostic value and risk stratification of residual disease in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Given their poor prognosis, patients with residual disease (RD) in the re-resection specimen of an incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC) could benefit from a better selection for surgical treatment. The Gallbladder Cancer Risk Score (GBRS) has been proposed to preoperatively identify RD risk more precisely than T-stage alone. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of RD and to validate the GBRS in a retrospective series of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospectively collected database including 59 patients with IGBC diagnosed from December 1996 to November 2015 was retrospectively analyzed. Three locations of RD were established: local, regional, and distant. The effect of RD on overall survival (OS) was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. To identify variables associated with the presence of RD, characteristics of patients with and without RD were compared using Fisher's exact test. The relative risk of RD associated with clinical and pathologic factors was studied with a univariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: RD was found in 30 patients (50.8%). The presence of RD in any location was associated with worse OS (29% vs. 74.2%, p = 0.0001), even after an R0 resection (37.7% vs 74.2%, p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in survival between patients without RD and with local RD (74.2% vs 64.3%, p = 0.266), nor between patients with regional RD and distant RD (16.1% vs 20%, p = 0.411). After selecting patients in which R0 resection was achieved (n = 44), 5-year survival rate for patients without RD, local RD, and regional RD was, respectively, 74.2%, 75%, and 13.9% (p = 0.0001). The GBRS could be calculated in 25 cases (42.3%), and its usefulness to predict the presence of regional or distant RD (RDRD) was confirmed (80% in high-risk patients and 30% in intermediate risk p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: RDRD, but not local RD, represents a negative prognostic factor of OS. The GBRS was useful to preoperatively identify patients with high risk of RDRD. An R0 resection did not improve OS of patients with regional RD.

Analgesia with continuous wound infusion of local anesthetic versus saline: Double-blind randomized, controlled trial in hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Surgical wound is source of pain in hepatectomy with laparotomy. Continuous wound infusion of ropivacaine may provide effective analgesia. METHODS: This prospective, randomized trial, patients scheduled for hepatectomy received a 48-h preperitoneal continuous wound infusion of either 0.23% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline at 5 ml/h. Primary endpoint was 48 h morphine consumption. RESULTS: 53 patients included in the ropivacaine group and 46 in the saline group. Morphine consumption was 24.63 mg in the ropivacaine group, and 26.78 mg (p = 0.669) in the saline group. Pain was comparable between groups and there were no differences in solid food intake, ambulation, or length of hospital stay. No local or systemic complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous wound infusion with ropivacaine is safe, but it neither reduced morphine consumption nor enhanced recovery in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Success of enhanced recovery in hepatectomy is not influenced by the analgesic regimen if pain is well controlled.

The influence of steatosis on the short- and long-term results of resection of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: We aimed to establish whether the presence of hepatic steatosis influences outcome after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients operated between 1990 and 2014 were divided into four groups based on the degree of hepatic steatosis. The association between hepatic steatosis and outcome was analyzed, using a multivariate and a propensity score case-match analysis. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between patients with and without steatosis in either mortality or morbidity in the complete series or after matching (3.2% vs. 3.5%/p = 0.845) (32.3% vs 31.4%/p = 0.802). Five-year survival in patients with and without steatosis were 56.5% and 46.5% respectively (p = 0.046). The steatosis had a significant protective effect in the univariate analysis (HR (95% CI) = 0.78 (0.62-0.99) p = 0.048), and was close to significance in the multivariate analysis (HR (95%) = 0.81 (0.63-1.03) p = 0.089). No significant differences were seen with regard to liver recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of steatosis does not predict short-outcome after resection of CLM, but appears to be a favorable prognostic factor for survival. This protective effect does not depend on a decrease in liver recurrence.

Technical options for outflow reconstruction in domino liver transplantation: A single European center experience.

Venous outflow is critical to the success of liver transplantation (LT). In domino liver transplantation (DLT), the venous cuffs should be shared between the donor and the recipient, and the length can be compromised. The aim of this study was to describe and compare the technical options for outflow reconstruction used at our institution. This was a retrospective analysis of 39 consecutive DLT recipients between January 1997 and May 2013. Twenty-seven men and 12 women (mean age, 61.8 ± 4.3 years) underwent LT and consented to receive a liver from a donor with familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP). The main indications were hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C virus cirrhosis. All recipients underwent transplantation by a piggyback technique. Liver procurement in the FAP donors was performed with the classic technique in 22 patients and with the piggyback technique in the last 17. In these latter cases, for vascular outflow reconstruction, a cadaveric venous graft was interposed between the hepatic vein (HV) stump of the FAP liver and the recipient HV in 11 cases (28%). Since 2011, we have employed arterial grafts to be interposed between the vessels stumps: a tailored arterial graft in 5 patients and an aortic graft in 1 case. There was no postoperative mortality. Arterial and portal complications presented in 2 (5.1) and 4 patients (10.3), respectively. Postoperative outflow complications (post-LT subacute Budd-Chiari syndrome) occurred in 4 patients, and all of them had received a venous interposed graft for reconstruction. The incidence of outflow complications tended to be higher among patients with venous grafts than those with arterial graft interposition. Overall patient survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 97%, 79%, respectively. Arterial grafts constitute a feasible and safe option for vascular outflow reconstruction in DLT because they are associated with a relatively low incidence of complications. The recently proposed Bellvitge arterial graft technique should be added to the current range of available surgical modalities.

Trasplante hepático urgente tras resección completa del pedículo hepático durante una colecistectomía laparoscópica / Urgent liver transplantation after complete resection of hepatic pedicle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

No disponible

Complicaciones biliares tras el trasplante hepático / Biliary complications after liver transplant

Las complicaciones biliares postrasplante hepático han sido desde los incios de su historia tema de gran interés por su elevada incidencia, y su influencia en la morbi mortalidad. La fístula biliar es actualmente infrecuente, y su manejo sencillo. La estenosis anastomótica mantiene una incidencia del 10-15%. Si bien se considera que el tratamiento de elección actual es mediante CPRE, el tratamiento quirúrgico (hepaticoyeyunostomía) sigue teniendo un papel relevante. Las estenosis no-anastomóticas tienen una incidencia del 5-10%, se relacionan con factores isquémicos o inmunológicos y su tratamiento habitualmente es el retrasplante. La coledocolitiasis tiene una incidencia del 5-10%, siendo el tratamiento de elección la CPRE. Sin embargo, el tratamiento de las complicaciones biliares, deberá ser individualizado. Deberemos tener en cuenta el momento del diagnóstico, la función hepática, el estado general del paciente, y la disponibilidad y experiencia del equipo en las diferentes opciones terapéuticas (AU)

There have been biliary complications since the beginning of liver transplants, and is a topic of great interest due to its high incidence, as well as their influence on morbidity and mortality. The biliary fistula is currently uncommon and its management is straightforward. Anastomotic stenosis continues to have an incidence of 10-15%. Although the current treatment of choice is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), surgical treatment (hepatico-jejunostomy) continues to have an important role. Non-anastomotic stenosis has an incidence of 5-10%, and is associated with ischaemic or immunological factors, and usually involves a re-transplant. Choledocholithiasis has an incidence of 5-10%, with the treatment of choice being ERCP. However the treatment of biliary complications should be individualised. We must take into account, liver function, the general health status of the patient, and the availability and experience of the team in the different therapeutic options (AU)

[Biliary complications after liver transplant]. / Complicaciones biliares tras el trasplante hepático.

There have been biliary complications since the beginning of liver transplants, and is a topic of great interest due to its high incidence, as well as their influence on morbidity and mortality. The biliary fistula is currently uncommon and its management is straightforward. Anastomotic stenosis continues to have an incidence of 10-15%. Although the current treatment of choice is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), surgical treatment (hepatico-jejunostomy) continues to have an important role. Non-anastomotic stenosis has an incidence of 5-10%, and is associated with ischaemic or immunological factors, and usually involves a re-transplant. Choledocholithiasis has an incidence of 5-10%, with the treatment of choice being ERCP. However the treatment of biliary complications should be individualised. We must take into account, liver function, the general health status of the patient, and the availability and experience of the team in the different therapeutic options.

Multicentre study of liver metastases from colorectal cancer in pathological livers.

OBJECTIVES: Resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases (LM) in pathological liver (PL) patients (with cirrhosis or hepatopathy) is extremely rare. The aim of this study was to perform a multicentre, retrospective analysis of epidemiology, surgical techniques and outcomes in patients with PL who underwent hepatic resection for CRC-LM. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre questionnaire was distributed to 15 hepatopancreatobiliary surgical units. RESULTS: Only six of 15 (40%) HPB units reported any experience in the surgical resection of CRC-LM in patients with PL. Of the 20 patients identified, 10 had underlying cirrhosis and 10 had chronic hepatopathy. Their median age was 66 years (range: 49-81 years). Thirteen patients were male. Liver dysfunction was known preoperatively in 18 patients. All patients had Child-Pugh class A disease. Six patients had synchronous disease. There were a total of 38 lesions among the 20 patients, distributed at a median of one lesion per patient (range: 1-4 lesions). The median size of the lesions was 3.0 cm (range: 1.5-9.0 cm). Preoperative median carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was 32.3 ng/ml (range: 1-184 ng/ml). The surgical procedures performed included: sub-segmentectomy (n= 12); left lateral sectionectomy (n= 6); segmentectomy (n= 4); radiofrequency ablation (n= 3), and exploratory laparotomy (n= 4). Morbidity occurred in four patients (Clavien grades I [n= 1], II [n= 2] and IVa [n= 1]). Mortality was nil. An R0 resection margin was achieved in 15 of 16 patients. Twelve patients did not receive chemotherapy. In resected patients, 10 presented with relapse. The median disease-free and overall survival periods were 12.2 and 22.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When feasible, liver resection is the best option for CRC-LM in PL patients.

Ventajas e inconvenientes de las diferentes técnicas quirúrgicas en el trasplante 'dominó' / No disponible

No disponible

Preoperative staging of patients with liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma. Does PET/CT really add something to multidetector CT?

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine prospectively whether the systematic use of PET/CT associated with conventional techniques could improve the accuracy of staging in patients with liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma. We also assessed the impact on the therapeutic strategy. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2008, 97 patients who were evaluated for resection of LMCRC were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative workup included multidetector-CT (MDCT) and PET/CT. In 11 patients with liver steatosis or iodinated contrast allergy, MR also was performed. Sixty-eight patients underwent laparotomy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive values for hepatic and extrahepatic staging of MDCT and PET-CT were calculated. RESULTS: In a lesion-by-lesion analysis of the hepatic staging, the sensitivity of MDCT/RM was superior to PET/CT (89.2 vs. 55%, p < 0.001). On the extrahepatic staging, PET/CT was superior to MDCT/MR only for the detection of locoregional recurrence (p = 0.03) and recurrence in uncommon sites (p = 0.016). New findings in PET/CT resulted in a change in therapeutic strategy in 17 patients. However, additional information was correct only in eight cases and wrong in nine patients. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT has a limited role in hepatic staging of LMCRC. Although PET-CT has higher sensitivity for the detection of extrahepatic disease in some anatomic locations, its results are hampered by its low PPV. PET/CT provided additional useful information in 8% of the cases but also incorrect and potentially harmful data in 9% of the staging. Our findings support a more selective use of PET/CT, basically in patients with high risk of local recurrence.

Risk of transmission of systemic transthyretin amyloidosis after domino liver transplantation.

Recent reports of the transmission of systemic transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis after domino liver transplantation (DLT) using grafts from patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) have raised concerns about the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the transmission incidence of systemic TTR amyloidosis after DLT with a complete clinical, neurological, and pathological assessment. At our institution, DLT has been performed 31 times with livers from patients with FAP. Seventeen of the 19 patients still alive in 2008 agreed to enter the study. This cross-sectional study of this cohort of patients included clinical assessments, rectal biopsy, and electroneuromyography (as well as sural nerve biopsy when it was indicated). The mean follow-up at the time of the study was 62.6 ± 2.9 months. Clinically, 3 patients complained of weak dysesthesia. When a focused study was performed, 8 patients reported some kind of neurological and/or gastrointestinal disturbance. Six of the rectal biopsy samples showed amyloid deposits (TTR-positive). Electromyography (EMG) showed signs of mild sensorimotor neuropathy in 3 cases and moderate to severe sensorimotor neuropathy in 1 case. Only 2 of the 4 patients with EMG signs of polyneuropathy showed amyloid deposits in their rectal biopsy samples. Sural nerve biopsy revealed amyloid deposits (TTR-positive) in all 4 patients with EMG signs of polyneuropathy. Two patients with normal EMG findings had TTR-positive amyloid deposits in their sural nerve biopsy samples. In conclusion, de novo systemic amyloidosis after DLT may be more frequent and appear earlier than was initially thought. In our opinion, however, the graft shortage still justifies DLT in selected patients, despite the risk of de novo systemic amyloidosis. Sural nerve biopsy with EMG and clinical correlation is mandatory for confirming the disease. Indeed, other causes of neuropathy should be excluded.

Tratamiento quirúrgico del adenocarcinoma pancreático mediante duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (Parte 1). Complicaciones postoperatorias en 204 casos en un centro de referencia / Surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (Part 1). Post-surgical complications in 204 cases in a reference hospit

Introducción: La duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (DPC) es el tratamiento de elección en el adenocarcinoma de cabeza de páncreas. Sin embargo, sigue presentando elevada morbilidad y mortalidad posquirúrgica. El objetivo de este estudio es definir las variables que influyen en la morbilidad y mortalidad postoperatoria tras la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica por adenocarcinoma de páncreas (ADCP). Material y métodos: Se han recogido prospectivamente las variables de los pacientes intervenidos entre 1991–2007, con el fin de investigar los factores asociados a una mayor morbilidad. Resultados: Se han intervenido 204 pacientes por ADCP, de ellos 57 eran mayores de 70 años. Se han realizado 119 DPC, 11 con linfadenectomía extendida, 66 DPC con preservación pilórica y 8 con ampliación a pancreatectomía total por afectación del margen de sección. Treinta y cinco casos asociaron resección venosa portal o mesentérica. Se han detectado complicaciones postquirúgicas en el 45% de casos, las más frecuentes: vaciado gástrico lento (20%), infección incisional (17%), fístula pancreática (10%), y complicaciones médicas graves (8%). El 13% fue reintervenido y la mortalidad postoperatoria global fue del 7%. La edad del paciente superior a 70 años, el hemoperitoneo postoperatorio, la dehiscencia gastroentérica, y la presencia de complicaciones médicas graves fueron factores de riesgo de mortalidad postquirúgica en el estudio multivaviante. La fístula pancreática no fue un factor relacionado con la mortalidad posquirúrgica. Conclusiones: La duodenopancreatectomía cefálica es una técnica segura pero con morbilidad considerable. Los pacientes con edad superior a 70 años deben ser seleccionados cuidadosamente antes de intervenirlos. Las complicaciones médicas graves deben tratarse de forma agresiva para evitar una evolución desfavorable (AU)

Introduction: Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (CDP) is the treatment of choice in cancer of the head of the pancreas. However, it continues to have a high post-surgical morbidity and mortality. The aim of this article is to define variables that influence post-surgical morbidity and mortality after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) cancer of the head of the pancreas (CHP). Material and methods: The variables were prospectively collected form patients operated on between 1991 and 2007, in order to investigate the factors of higher morbidity. Results: A total of 204 patients had been intervened due to PA, of whom 57 were older than 70 years. Of these patients, 119 had a CPD, 11 extended lymphadectomy, 66 with pyloric conservation, and 8 with extension to total pancreatectomy due to involvement of the section margin. Portal or mesenteric vein resection was included in 35 cases. Post-surgical complications were detected in 45% of cases, the most frequent being: slow gastric emptying (20%), surgical wound infection (17%), pancreatic fistula (10%), and serious medical complications (8%). Further surgery was required in 13%, and the over post-surgical mortality was 7%. A patient age greater than 70 years, post-surgical haemoperitoneum, gastroenteric dehiscence, and the presence of medical complications were post-surgical mortality risk factors in the multivariate analysis. Pancreatic fistula was not a factor associated with post-surgical mortality. Conclusions: Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy is a safe technique but with a considerable morbidity. Patients over 70 years of age must be carefully selected before considering surgery. Serious medical complications must be treated aggressively to avoid an unfavourable progression (AU)

[Surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (Part 1). Post-surgical complications in 204 cases in a reference hospital]. / Tratamiento quirúrgico del adenocarcinoma pancreático mediante duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (Parte 1). Complicaciones postoperatorias en 204 casos en un centro de referencia.

INTRODUCTION: Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (CDP) is the treatment of choice in cancer of the head of the pancreas. However, it continues to have a high post-surgical morbidity and mortality. The aim of this article is to define variables that influence post-surgical morbidity and mortality after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) cancer of the head of the pancreas (CHP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The variables were prospectively collected form patients operated on between 1991 and 2007, in order to investigate the factors of higher morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients had been intervened due to PA, of whom 57 were older than 70 years. Of these patients, 119 had a CPD, 11 extended lymphadenectomy, 66 with pyloric conservation, and 8 with extension to total pancreatectomy due to involvement of the section margin. Portal or mesenteric vein resection was included in 35 cases. Post-surgical complications were detected in 45% of cases, the most frequent being: slow gastric emptying (20%), surgical wound infection (17%), pancreatic fistula (10%), and serious medical complications (8%). Further surgery was required in 13%, and the over post-surgical mortality was 7%. A patient age greater than 70 years, post-surgical haemoperitoneum, gastroenteric dehiscence, and the presence of medical complications were post-surgical mortality risk factors in the multivariate analysis. Pancreatic fistula was not a factor associated with post-surgical mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy is a safe technique but with a considerable morbidity. Patients over 70 years of age must be carefully selected before considering surgery. Serious medical complications must be treated aggressively to avoid an unfavourable progression.