Reverse shoulder arthroplasty or nothing for patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to nonoperative treatment for patients presenting with complex proximal fractures have been rarely explored. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the functional results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those of nonsurgical treatment in patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: A multicentric prospective randomized control trial of patients older than 70 years who sustained an acute proximal humeral fracture (3 or 4 parts), with less than 3 weeks of evolution, and had no previous condition or surgery on the affected shoulder was conducted. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (implantation of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty and tuberosities reattachment) or the control group (nonoperative treatment). Functional outcome was assessed using the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at the 1-year follow-up. Complications and reinterventions were considered secondary outcomes. The power of the study relied on the inclusion of 81 patients to recognize a statistically significant difference of 10 points between CMS scores in the groups. Analysis was performed based on the intention to treat principle. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were randomized to surgical treatment or nonoperative treatment, while 66 patients completed the 1-year follow-up evaluation. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age (76.1 yo vs. 77.43 yo, P = .43), sex (81.08% women in the surgical group vs. 84.09% in the nonoperative group, P = .72), or type of fracture according to Neer's classification system (P = .06). At the 1-year follow-up, the group assigned to undergo the intervention had better functional outcomes than the nonoperative treatment group (mean CMS; 61.24, SD: 13.33 vs. mean CMS: 52.44, SD: 16.22, P: .02), with a mean difference of 8.84 points, 95% CI (1.57, 16.11). Two patients in the intervention group (6.5%) suffered major complications (periprosthetic joint infection and axillary nerve palsy). No major complications were observed in the nonoperative group. One patient in the intervention group underwent secondary surgery for a periprosthetic joint infection. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides superior functional outcomes compared with conservative treatment for patients presenting with an acute proximal humeral fracture. The difference in CMS is close to the clinically significant thresholds, and some harms are associated with the operative treatment.

Plastic waste in major orthopaedic surgical procedures: descriptive and sources of improvement.

PURPOSE: The healthcare industry is a significant contributor to single-use plastic waste, particularly in the operating room (OR). This study aims to assess the volume of plastic waste generated during total hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty in the OR and identify areas for improvement. METHOD: A prospective transversal study at a tertiary hospital was conducted. All total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) from April to July 2021 were included. The weight of plastic used during patient preparation, anaesthesia, and the surgical procedure was recorded. To calculate the environmental impact, a calculator generated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) was used. RESULTS: A total of 68 surgeries were included. The mean weight of plastic used in total was 7.3 kg (SD 0.48), with the highest yielding procedure being TKA. It generated a mean of 7.63 kg (SD 0.28), followed by THA at 7.28 kg (SD 0.43), and RSA at 6.87 kg (SD 0.47). Various scenarios were simulated to evaluate the potential impact of reducing plastic waste. Substituting plastic wrapping with recyclable materials could save 159.6 kg of CO2 emissions per 100 prostheses. Eliminating non-essential equipment and adopting reusable fabric drapes also showed a significant potential. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the need for environmentally sustainable practices in the OR. In this way, the healthcare sector can contribute to a cleaner and greener world without compromising patient safety.

Are Cutibacterium acnes delivered from skin to deep tissues in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to determine whether the deep tissues are inoculated during surgery with the Cutibacterium acnes still present in the skin after the surgical preparation in reverse shoulder arthroplasties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study including patients undergoing surgery with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. All the patients received preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin (2 g IV) and the skin was prepared with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol. From all the patients, 9 cultures were obtained after the antibiotic was administrated and the skin surgically prepared. The cultures were sent to isolate C. acnes. DNA was extracted from the C. acnes isolated colonies. Isolate nucleotide distances were calculated using the Genome-based distance matrix calculator from the Enveomics collection toolbox. RESULTS: The study included 90 patients. C. acnes was isolated in 24 patients (26.6%) with a total of 61 positive cultures. There were 12 phylotype II, 27 IB and 22 IA. In 9 patients, C. acnes was present in both skin and deep tissues, and they constituted the sample to be studied by means of genomic analysis. In 7 out of the 9 patients, deep tissue samples clustered closer to at least one of its corresponding skin isolates when compared to the other independent bacterial ones. CONCLUSIONS: The C. acnes present in the skin at the beginning of the surgery are the same as those found in the deep tissues at the end of the surgery. This result strengthens the possibility that the C. acnes is delivered from the skin to the deep tissues.

Functional outcomes and complications of patients contaminated with Cutibacterium acnes during primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: study at two- and five-years of follow-up.

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to compare the functional outcomes and the complication rate of the patients with C. acnes contamination at the end of the primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) surgery to those patients without C. acnes contamination. METHOD: A total of 162 patients were included. In all cases, skin and deep tissue cultures were obtained. A molecular typing characterization of the C. acnes strains was performed. Functional outcomes were assessed with the Constant score at the two and five year follow-up and all complications were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 1380 cultures were obtained from the 162 primary RSA surgeries. Of those, 96 turned out to be positive for C. acnes. There were 25 patients with positive cultures for C. acnes. The overall postoperative Constant score was not significantly different between those patients having C. acnes-positive cultures and those with negative cultures at the two and five year follow-up (59.2 vs. 59.6 at two years, p 0.870, and 59.5 vs. 62.4 at five years, p 0.360). Patients with positive cultures presented a higher complication rate (p 0.001) with two infections, one revision surgery, and one dislocation. CONCLUSION: Patients ending up with C. acnes-positive cultures after primary shoulder arthroplasty surgery do not have worse clinical outcomes when compared to patients having negative cultures, but a greater number of complications were found in those patients with C. acnes-positive cultures.

Minimal number of cultures needed to detect Cutibacterium acnes in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the minimum number of cultures needed to detect Cutibacterium acnes in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs). METHODS: It is a prospective study including 160 primary RSAs. Exclusion criteria included an active infection, an invasive shoulder treatment in the last 6 months before surgery, an Arthro-SCAN or Arthro-MRI in the last 6 months before surgery, previous shoulder surgeries and revision cases. In 90 cases, 11 cultures were obtained. Another 10 cultures were obtained in the other 70 cases (culture 10 was a sterile sponge to detect false positives). To determine the minimum number of cultures needed to detect C acnes, the prevalence of C acnes contamination of the 160 patients included was determined. RESULTS: There were 128 females and 32 males, with a mean age of 74 years. There were 1690 cultures obtained from the 160 primary RSA surgeries, and 132 of them turned out to be positive for C acnes. There were 42 patients with positive cultures. Twenty of them were males and 22 females. When considering the skin and the deep tissue cultures altogether, the prevalence of positive cultures for C acnes was of 26.25%. If only deep tissues cultures were considered, the prevalence of positive cultures for C acnes was of 23.13%. When considering the skin and the deep tissue cultures together, the sensitivity to detect the C acnes is 19% if only 1 culture is obtained, 31% if 2 cultures are obtained, 50% if 3 cultures are obtained, 59.5% if 4 cultures are obtained, 66.7% if 5 cultures are obtained, 73.8% if 6 cultures are obtained, 85.7% if 7 cultures are obtained, and 92.9% if 8 cultures are obtained. When considering only the deep tissue cultures, if only 1 culture is obtained, the sensitivity to detect the C acnes is 24.3%, 40.5% if 2 cultures are obtained, 54.1% if 3 cultures are obtained, 73% if 4 cultures are obtained, 89.2% if 5 cultures are obtained, and 97.3% if 6 or 7 cultures are obtained. DISCUSSION: A minimum number of 8 cultures are needed to detect C acnes in skin. Moreover, a minimum of 6 cultures are needed to detect it in deep tissues when performing an RSA.

Patients Lost to Follow-up in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Descriptive Characteristics and Reasons.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the number of patients lost to follow-up yearly in shoulder arthroplasty and investigate the characteristics of the patients lost to follow-up that may differ from those not lost to follow-up. METHODS: All shoulder arthroplasties performed from January 2008 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The number of patients lost to follow-up was determined yearly. Independent variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, type of prostheses, living condition, smoking, alcohol intake, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, in-hospital length, surgery length, living area, preoperative Constant score, last Constant score available, and complications. Number of deaths was recorded. RESULTS: This study included 251 patients. There was an accumulation of 86 patients (34.3%) lost to follow-up after a maximum of 8 years. During the first year, 9.9% of the patients were lost to follow-up, 18.3% in the second year, 25.1% in the third year, 28.7% in the fourth year, 31.5% in the fifth year, 33.9% in the sixth year, and 34.3% in the seventh year. Patients with severe obesity had 2.44 times greater risk of being lost to follow-up (hazard ratio [HR], 2.44; p < 0.001). Elderly patients were also at higher risk (HR, 1.05; p < 0.001). Increases in the ASA score raised the risk of being lost (HR, 1.93; p < 0.001). Patients with complications had a lower risk (43%) of being lost (HR, 0.57; p = 0.018) at the 8-year follow-up. At the 2-year follow-up, the patients with acute fractures and fracture sequelae had a higher risk of being lost to follow-up (HR, 2.44; p = 0.002), and the patients with complications were not significantly different from those without complications (HR, 0.54; p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The longer the follow-up in shoulder arthroplasty, the greater the number of patients lost to follow-up, reaching 34.3% by the seventh year. Patients lost to follow-up were not random in shoulder arthroplasty: older patients, severely obese patients, and those with higher ASA scores were at higher risk of being lost to follow-up, but reasons for being lost to follow-up changed through time and depending on when they were assessed.

Are Cutibacterium acnes present at the end of primary shoulder prosthetic surgeries responsible for infection? Prospective study.

The purpose of this study was to investigate if the C. acnes present at the end of a primary shoulder arthroplasty could be responsible for shoulder arthroplasty infection. Prospective study includes patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty from January 2015 until December 2018. From all the patients included, 5 to 12 tissue samples were obtained and were specifically cultured to detect the presence of C. acnes. DNA was extracted from the C acnes isolated colonies and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) analysis was done. A cohort of 156 patients was finally included. In twenty-seven patients, the C. acnes was present at the end of the primary surgery. Two of these patients developed a C. acnes periprosthetic shoulder infection at 6 and 4 months after the primary surgery. WGS of C. acnes isolated colonies showed that all the revision-surgery isolates clustered near to the corresponding primary-surgery isolates compared to the other independent bacterial colonies. (99.89% of similarity). C. acnes present at the end of the primary surgery can be the cause of early or delayed periprosthetic joint infections in shoulder arthroplasty.

Positioning of the metaglene in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: deltopectoral versus anterosuperior approach: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether there are differences in metaglene positioning related to the approach used (deltopectoral vs. anterosuperior) in primary reverse shoulder prosthesis (reverse shoulder arthroplasty) implantation. The hypothesis was that there would be no differences in metaglene positioning between the 2 approaches. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was designed to evaluate metaglene positioning in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The patients included were allocated to either the deltopectoral approach (group I) or the anterosuperior approach (group II). Glenosphere overhang and glenosphere tilt were assessed using the methods described by Lévigne et al, Simovitch et al, and Kempton et al, and the beta angle was assessed as described by Maurer et al. The functional outcome was assessed with the Constant score at 2 years' follow-up. Scapular notch development and complication rates were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients (77 women and 21 men) were randomized and allocated to group I (49 patients) or group II (49 patients). The mean age of the patients was 74.4 years (standard deviation, 6.3 years). Glenosphere overhang did not show significant differences between groups (6.5 mm in group I vs. 6.1 mm in group II by the Lévigne method, P = .482; 2.2 mm in group I vs. 2.1 mm in group II by the Simovitch method, P = .08). Glenosphere tilt was significantly different between groups (94.6° in group I vs. 86.8° in group II by the Lévigne method, P < .001; 125.9° in group I vs. 119.4° in group II by the Kempton method, P = .002). This was also the case for the prosthesis-scapular neck angle (94.6° in group I vs. 86.8° in group II, P < .001). Moreover, the postoperative beta angle was significantly different between groups (78.6° in group I vs. 73.8° in group II, P = .001). No significant differences were noted in terms of functional outcomes as measured with the Constant score (P = .16). No significant differences between groups were noted relative to scapular notch development and the overall complication rate. DISCUSSION: The deltopectoral and anterosuperior approaches do not differ relative to the craniocaudal positioning of the metaglene, but a slight superior tilt can be expected when using the anterosuperior approach. Both approaches yield comparable functional outcomes, scapular notch development, and complication rates at 2 years' follow-up.

One Versus 3-Week Immobilization Period for Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the duration of immobilization for nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). The main objective of the study was to determine the differences in pain between PHFs that were treated nonoperatively with 3-week immobilization and those treated with 1-week immobilization. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was designed to evaluate whether the immobilization time frame (1-week immobilization [group I] versus 3-week immobilization [group II]) for nonoperatively treated PHFs had any influence on pain and functional outcomes. Pain was assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) that was administrated 1 week after the fracture, at 3 weeks, and then at the 3, 6, 12, and 24-month follow-up. The functional outcome was evaluated using the Constant score. To assess the functional disability of the shoulder, a self-reported shoulder-specific questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), was used. The Constant score and the SST were recorded at the 3, 6, 12, and 24-month follow-up. Complications and secondary displacement were also recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three patients were randomized, and 111 (88 females and 23 males) who had been allocated to group I (55 patients) or group II (56 patients) were included in the final analysis. The mean age of the patients was 70.4 years (range, 42 to 94 years). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of pain as measured with the VAS at any time point (1 week [5.9 versus 5.6; p = 0.648], 3 weeks [4.8 versus 4.1; p = 0.059], 3 months [1.9 versus 2.4; p = 0.372], 6 months [1.0 versus 1.2; p = 0.605], 1 year [0.65 versus 0.66; p = 0.718], and 2 years [0.63 versus 0.31; p = 0.381]). No significant differences were found in the Constant score or SST score at any time point. No significant differences were noted in the complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: Short and long periods of immobilization yield similar results for nonoperatively treated PHFs, independent of the fracture pattern. These fractures can be successfully managed with a short immobilization period of 1 week in order to not compromise patients' independence for an overly extended period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Randomized controlled trial Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Non-medical patient-related factor influence in proximal humeral fracture outcomes: a multicentric study.

PURPOSE: Age, sex, and type of fracture have traditionally been described as prognostic factors for proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). Some non-medical patient-related factors may play a role in the outcome. This paper evaluates the association of comorbidities and socioeconomic factors with clinical outcomes for PHF. METHODS: A total of 217 patients with PHF were evaluated according to Neer's classification with X-ray. Comorbidities were assessed through the Charlson comorbidity index and, non-medical patient-related factors were determined with a 52-item questionnaire concerning personal behaviors such as social activities, family support, economic solvency, and leisure-time activities. The clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), with a minimum 1-year follow-up. The minimal clinically relevant difference for the CMS was set at 10 points. A multivariable analysis was performed to adjust for comorbidities and non-medical patient-related factors, such as age, sex, fracture classification, and treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-three patients completed the initial research protocol, while 126 of them completed the 1-year follow-up. The mean age was 71.6 years (SD ± 13.3), and 79.3% of the patients were women. In the bivariable analysis, age and comorbidities were correlated with the CMS (correlation coefficient: - 0.34 [- 0.49, 0.17] and 0.35 [0.18, 0.50], respectively), as well as non-medical patient-related factors and the fracture pattern (p value ANOVA < 0.001). In the multivariable regression model, the effects of considering oneself socially active, without economic problems, and self-sufficient were associated with a higher CMS than the effect of the fracture pattern (beta coefficient: 11.69 [6.09-17.30], 15.54 [8.32-22.75], and 10.61 [3.34-17.88], respectively). CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic status had a higher impact on functional outcomes than fracture pattern in patients with PHF.

Opinion leaders in the medical community attract more attention than randomized controlled trials in shoulder surgery.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine whether opinion leaders in the medical community attract more attention than randomized controlled trials (RCT) in shoulder surgery. METHODS: A PubMed search to retrieve all therapeutic and diagnosis RCT shoulder studies was carried out. Three opinion leaders were chosen from among the last ten presidents of the European Shoulder and Elbow Society based on the number of publications. Their studies were also retrieved from PubMed. The metrics of the studies were determined through ResearchGate and Web of Science. The year of publication, impact factor of the journal, level of evidence, number of citations, number of reads, research interest, and reported conflicts of interest were recorded for every study. RESULTS: Two-hundred forty-five shoulder RCTs and 236 opinion leader studies met the inclusion criteria. The opinion leader studies were read significantly more times than the RCTs (p = 0.04). The mean impact factor for RCT studies was 2.84 (SD 3.9) while it was of 1.99 (SD1.14) in the opinion leader group (p < 0.001). Most of the studies of the opinion leaders were level IV (73.3%), while only 6.3% of their papers were categorized as levels I-II. Conflict of interest was present in 19.6% of the RCTs and in 32.2% of the opinion leader studies (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The medical community pays more attention to opinion leader studies in shoulder surgery than to RCT studies even though RCTs are published in higher impact factor journals and opinion leader studies are mainly level IV evidence studies.

Sonication in shoulder surgery: is it necessary?

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to determine whether sonication yields greater sensitivity when compared with the traditional tissue culture in detecting peri-implant infections in shoulder surgery. METHODS: It is a retrospective study that includes 99 shoulder surgeries with implants explanted. The inclusion criteria required at least four tissue cultures, sonication of the material explanted, and a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients were classified according to the definition of periprosthetic shoulder infection of the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections. The classifications are definitive infection, probable infection, possible infection, and unlikely infection. RESULTS: Among the 99 surgical procedures, 31 were considered definitive infections, 11 possible/probable infections, and 57 unlikely infections. Considering the cases with a definitive infection, the sensitivity of the tissue culture was 87.09% and the sensitivity of sonication stood at 80.64% (p = 0.406). Analyzing the cases with a definitive infection and those having a possible/probable infection together and comparing them with those with unlikely infection, the sensitivity of sonication was 80.4% and the sensitivity of the tissue culture came to 91.4%. The specificity of the sonication was 98.1% and the specificity of the tissue culture was 99.6%. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of sonication in shoulder surgery (80.64%) is not superior to the sensitivity of the tissue culture (87.09%). Specificity remains high with both methods, being 98.1% in the sonication group and 99.6% in the tissue culture. Sonication brings no benefit to the detection of shoulder per-implant infections.

Can small glenospheres with eccentricity reduce scapular notching as effectively as large glenospheres without eccentricity? A prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze whether small glenospheres with eccentricity were comparable to large glenospheres in scapular notch development. METHODS: This prospective randomized study included 82 patients who had undergone a reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 2-year follow-up period. After randomization, 43 patients were allocated to receive a 42-mm glenosphere and 39 patients were allocated to receive a 38-mm glenosphere with 2 mm of eccentricity. Scapular notch development was defined after examination of an anteroposterior radiograph at the end of follow-up. Functional outcomes were recorded using the Constant score before surgery and at the end of follow-up. RESULTS: Scapular notch development was present in 16.6% of patients who received a 42-mm glenosphere and 34.2% of patients who received a 38-mm eccentric glenosphere. No significant difference was found between the groups with the number of cases available (P = .07). Functional outcomes significantly increased from preoperatively to postoperatively in both groups, with no significant difference found between them (P = .77). The mean glenosphere overhang measure was 6.3 mm in patients with a 42-mm glenosphere and 6.0 mm in those with a 38-mm eccentric glenosphere (P = .68). No significant differences were noted between patients with a scapular notch and patients without a scapular notch in terms of functional outcomes. DISCUSSION: Small glenospheres with eccentricity fared slightly worse than large glenospheres regarding scapular notch development, even though no significant differences were noted. Functional outcomes were comparable between the 2 designs.

Optimistic bias: the more you do, the better you think it goes. Survey analysis of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Even though heuristics are very helpful, several biases have been described related to their use. The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of surgery volume on the surgeon's perception of pain improvement in patients after having received a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. DESIGN: Successive independent samples study. SETTING: Shoulder surgeons attending four shoulder meetings. PARTICIPANTS: 149 Shoulder surgeons were included. INTERVENTION: Physicians were asked to postulate the preoperative and postoperative pain of patients receiving a reverse shoulder arthroplasty and respond by putting a mark on two visual pain scales. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain improvement, years of shoulder practice, number of shoulder studies read over 6 months and the number of reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed per year. To compare the answers of the survey-study, a cohort of 95 patients who had undergone reverse shoulder Arthroplasty because of a rotator cuff arthropathy were prospectively followed. RESULTS: Regarding the pain score before and after surgery, the patient cohort showed a mean improvement of 6.84 points. In terms of the doctors, the more years of surgical practice, led them to have a greater expectation of improvement (p=0.004). Moreover, the greater the number of prostheses they implanted, the greater the expectation of improvement (p=0.0005). It was the same in terms of the number of studies read by them (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Years of practice, hospital position and the number of shoulder arthroplasties done per year all favor the surgeon's perception that their patients obtain a greater pain relief after receiving a shoulder arthroplasty than the real improvement in pain relief the patients experience.

Do we really allow patient decision-making in rotator cuff surgery? A prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing patient interest in being involved in the decision-making process. However, little information is provided on how this information should be structured. Does it make a difference, in patient treatment decision-making, whether information is given based on the benefits or on the side effects in rotator cuff disorders? METHODS: It is a prospective randomized study that includes patients diagnosed with rotator cuff tears. Patients were randomly allocated to either group A (benefit-inform) or group B (side effect-inform) and were asked to answer the following questions based on their assigned group: Group A: Your doctor informs you that you have a rotator cuff tear and states that if he/she surgically repairs your cuff tear you will improve and that the cuff remains healed at the 2-year follow-up in 71% of the cases where surgery is done. Would you choose surgery? Yes or No Group B: Your doctor informs you that you have a rotator cuff tear and that if he/she surgically repairs your cuff tear you will improve and that the cuff is torn again at 2-year follow-up in 29% of the cases where surgery is done. Would you choose surgery? Yes or No Age, gender, the shoulder affected and the functional status assessed through the Constant score were also recorded. RESULTS: 80 patients were randomized (43 to group A and 37 to group B). The patients assigned to group A (benefit) accepted surgery significantly more frequently than those assigned to group B (complication) (P = 0.000). In group A, 36 of 43 (84%) accepted surgery, compared to 17 of 37 (46%) in group B. CONCLUSIONS: The way that information on rotator cuff disorders is provided strongly influences patients' treatment decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03205852 . Registered 29 June 2017. Retrospectively registered.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae: How the initial fracture treatment influences the outcomes of joint replacement.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in proximal humeral fracture sequelae (PHFS) in fractures initially treated conservatively versus those initially treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: It is a retrospective study that includes all PHFS treated with a RSA from September 2006 to December 2013. Twenty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 9 patients (7 females and 2 males; mean age: 79.11 years) treated with RSA due to a fracture sequelae following conservative treatment and 18 patients (15 females and 3 males; mean age: 76.83 years) treated with a RSA owing to a fracture sequelae after ORIF. The functional outcome was recorded with the aid of the pre-surgery Constant Score and at the latest follow-up (minimum of two years). All the patients included underwent an imaging study that included plain X-Rays and a CT scan prior to surgery and plain X-Rays after surgery. All complications and reoperations during follow-up were also recorded. RESULTS: Both groups had significantly increased Constant Scores after surgery (p < 0.0001), but the patients in the conservative group had significantly better outcomes for the total Constant Score (p = 0.024), for forward elevation (p = 0.026) and for external rotation (p = 0.004). A total of 4 complications (14.8%) were present during the follow-up period. In the conservative group, 1 patient developed an infection and there were 2 dislocations and 1 infection in the ORIF group. CONCLUSION: The use of RSA in the treatment of PHFS results in a limited outcome improvement but with an acceptable complication rate. Patients developing PHFS after conservative treatment may expect better outcomes and fewer complications than those developing PHFS after ORIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.