Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dairy Res ; 78(4): 489-99, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21939576

ABSTRACT

Selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) has received increasing attention in recent years owing to global concerns over agricultural use of antimicrobial drugs and development of antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of SDCT on milk yield and somatic cell count (SCC) in dairy herds in the USA. Cows in four Ohio dairy herds were categorized into two groups (low-SCC and high-SCC) at dry-off based on their SCC and clinical mastitis (CM) history during the lactation preceding the dry-off. Low-SCC cows were randomly assigned to receive or not to receive intramammary antibiotics at dry-off. Milk yield and SCC of these cows during the following lactation were compared using linear mixed effects models, adjusting for parity, calving season, stage of lactation, previous lactation milk yield and herd. Milk yield of untreated and treated low-SCC cows at dry-off did not differ significantly during the following lactation. Overall, treated low-SCC cows had 16% lower SCC (approximately 35 000 cells/ml, P = 0·0267) than the untreated cows during the following lactation; however, the effect was variable in different herds. Moreover the impact of treatment, or the lack thereof, on milk yield varied considerably between herds. The results suggested that in some herds treating all cows at dry-off may be beneficial while in other herds leaving healthy cows without antibiotic dry cow treatment has no negative impact on milk yield or milk quality (SCC), and in fact, may be beneficial. Further studies are needed to identify characteristics of herds where treating all cows routinely at dry-off may be needed for maintaining good udder health and where switching to selective treatment of cows at dry-off would be the optimal approach to achieve best results.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cattle/physiology , Cell Count/veterinary , Dairying/methods , Lactation , Milk/cytology , Animals , Female , Lactation/drug effects , Mammary Glands, Animal/drug effects , Mastitis, Bovine/prevention & control
2.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 21(4): 427-36, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19564490

ABSTRACT

Isolation of pathogens from duplicate or multiple milk samples is currently considered the gold standard in diagnosis of bovine intramammary infections (IMI). However, in large field studies and especially in normal dairy production conditions, collection of single samples is often the most practical option to determine the causal agents of mastitis in a herd. The objective of the present study was to determine how well results between the first and the second sample in pairs of duplicate and successive quarter milk samples agree, using 5 different IMI definitions, based on the number of colony forming units (CFU) per milliliter of milk and epidemiology of the pathogens isolated. Agreement between microbiologic results from the first and the second sample of a pair was assessed by calculating the percentage of agreement and kappa coefficient. Milk samples collected at dry-off from 561 Holstein cows in 4 Ohio dairy herds were included in the analyses. Results of the study indicate that the agreement between the first and the second sample of a duplicate pair was high when criteria to call a sample positive was adjusted for the number of CFU/ml of milk by considering the epidemiology of different mastitis organisms. This finding suggests that an IMI can be accurately diagnosed with single samples. For contagious pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus) a cutoff of 100 CFU/ml and a cutoff of 1,000 CFU/ml for major environmental and minor pathogens will serve as a sensible approach to diagnose bovine IMI with single milk samples.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Mastitis, Bovine/diagnosis , Animals , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Cattle , Dairying , Female , Lactation , Mastitis, Bovine/epidemiology , Mastitis, Bovine/microbiology , Milk/microbiology , Ohio/epidemiology , Prevalence , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
J Dairy Res ; 75(2): 240-7, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18474143

ABSTRACT

Interest in selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) has been increasing owing to concerns over development of antimicrobial resistance. Implementation of SDCT, however, requires a quick and cost-effective on-farm method for identifying cows for treatment and cows that can be left without treatment. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the use of clinical mastitis (CM) history and somatic cell counts (SCC) from monthly Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) records in identification of infected and uninfected cows at dry-off. A total of 647 Holstein cows were classified as uninfected or infected at dry-off based on CM history and varying number of monthly SCC records (with three different SCC cut-offs). Cows were considered uninfected based on the following criteria: (1) SCC <100,000 cells/ml and no CM during the lactation; (2) SCC <200,000 cells/ml and no CM during the lactation; (3) as criterion two, but additionally a cow was also considered uninfected if it experienced a case of CM during the first 3 months of the lactation and the SCC was <100,000 cells/ml for the rest of the lactation; (4) SCC <300,000 cells/ml and no CM during the lactation; otherwise they were considered infected. Infected and uninfected cows at dry-off were most efficiently identified using three months' SCC records with a threshold of 200,000 cells/ml for cows without CM during the lactation and a threshold of 100,000 cells/ml during the rest of lactation for cows with CM during the first 90 days in milk. Moreover, this criterion also most efficiently identified cows infected with major pathogens only at dry-off. The success of the criteria used for identifying infected and uninfected cows will, however, depend on herd characteristics, such as prevalence of infection and type of pathogens present in the herd.


Subject(s)
Lactation/physiology , Mastitis, Bovine/diagnosis , Records/veterinary , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Cattle , Dairying , Female , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Vet Dermatol ; 18(2): 115-9, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17355426

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of an ear rinse containing tromethamine, EDTA, benzyl alcohol and 0.1% ketoconazole in purified water on Malassezia organisms from dogs with otitis externa. Malassezia organisms were collected from ear swab samples from the external ear canal of 19 dogs with otitis externa plus one control strain of Malassezia pachydermatis. Three test solutions were evaluated: ER (EDTA, tromethamine, benzyl alcohol), ER + keto (EDTA, tromethamine, benzyl alcohol, ketoconazole), and H2O (purified water). Ten-millilitre aliquots of each test solution was transferred into 20 tubes and inoculated with one of the isolates (1 tube per isolate: 19 clinical and 1 control strain). Samples were retrieved from each tube at five time points (0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min), transferred to Petri dishes, mixed with Sabouraud dextrose agar supplemented with 0.5% Tween 80 and incubated. Following incubation, the plates were examined for growth and colonies counted as colony-forming units per millilitre. The data were analysed using a repeated measures analysis, with pair-wise comparisons of solution-time combinations. There was a significant reduction in Malassezia growth in ER + keto at all time points (P < 0.0001) compared to time zero. Neither ER nor H2O had any effect on the growth of Malassezia. ER + keto was significantly more effective in reducing Malassezia growth (P < 0.0001) at all time points compared to both ER and H2O. ER + keto may be useful in the treatment of Malassezia otitis externa. Future studies should be performed to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of ER + keto as treatment for otic infections caused by Malassezia.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Malassezia/drug effects , Otitis Externa/veterinary , Administration, Topical , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Benzyl Alcohol/administration & dosage , Benzyl Alcohol/pharmacology , Benzyl Alcohol/therapeutic use , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Dog Diseases/pathology , Dogs , Drug Therapy, Combination , Edetic Acid/administration & dosage , Edetic Acid/pharmacology , Edetic Acid/therapeutic use , In Vitro Techniques , Ketoconazole/administration & dosage , Ketoconazole/pharmacology , Ketoconazole/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Otitis Externa/drug therapy , Tromethamine/administration & dosage , Tromethamine/pharmacology , Tromethamine/therapeutic use
5.
Am J Vet Res ; 67(6): 1040-4, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16740099

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vitro activity of an ear rinse (ER) containing tromethamine, EDTA, and benzyl alcohol on bacterial pathogens from dogs with otitis. SAMPLE POPULATION: Organisms were collected from ear swab specimens from the external and middle ear and included Staphylococcus spp (n = 11; Staphylococcus intermedius [7] and Staphylococcus spp [4]), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5), Proteus spp (5), beta-hemolytic streptococcus (11), and 1 control strain of each organism. PROCEDURES: 3 test solutions were evaluated including EDTA, tromethamine, and benzyl alcohol (ER); EDTA and tromethamine (ER without benzyl alcohol [ER - BA]); and purified water. Ten-milliliter aliquots of each test solution were transferred into 36 tubes and inoculated with one of the organisms. Samples were retrieved from each tube at 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes, transferred to Petri dishes, mixed with soybean-casein digest agar, and incubated. After incubation, plates were examined for growth, and the number of colonies was expressed as CFU per milliliter. RESULTS: ER significantly decreased bacterial growth in vitro of P aeruginosa and beta-hemolytic streptococcal organisms within 15 minutes, Proteus spp within 30 minutes, and Staphylococcus spp within 60 minutes. Comparatively, the presence of benzyl alcohol in ER significantly decreased bacterial growth of beta-hemolytic streptococcus and Proteus spp. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: On the basis of results of this study, future studies should be performed to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of ER alone as a treatment for otic infections caused by beta-hemolytic streptococcus, P aeruginosa, and Proteus spp and of ER combined with an antimicrobial agent for otic infections caused by Staphylococcus spp.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/drug effects , Benzyl Alcohol/pharmacology , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Edetic Acid/pharmacology , Otitis Externa/veterinary , Otitis Media/veterinary , Tromethamine/pharmacology , Animals , Benzyl Alcohol/administration & dosage , Dogs , Dosage Forms , Edetic Acid/administration & dosage , Otitis Externa/microbiology , Otitis Media/microbiology , Tromethamine/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...