ABSTRACT
Vultures are nature's most successful scavengers, feeding on the carcasses of dead animals present in the field. Availability of domestic carrion has been unstable due to rapidly changing agro-grazing economies and increasing sanitary regulations that may require burial or burning of livestock carcasses. Thus, several griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) recoveries are based on European legislation that guarantees the animals' welfare, avoids intense persecution of the vultures and allows the feeding of threatened wildlife in supplementary feeding stations (SFS). However, in recent years, many studies have speculated on the likelihood that avian scavengers may be infected by feeding on pig carcasses at SFS from intensive livestock. In this context, the present study evaluated whether free-living griffon vultures and pig farms share zoonotic Salmonella strains to test the hypothesis that vulture are infected during consumption of carcasses provided at SFS. Here, the occurrence, serotypes and genomic DNA fingerprinting (phage typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) of isolated strains were carried out in griffon vultures and pig farms authorised to provided carcasses at SFS in Castellón province (eastern Spain). The bacteriological analyses revealed that 21.1% of vultures and 14.5% for pig farms samples tested were Salmonella-positive. Monophasic S. typhimurium 1,4,[5],12:i:- was the most frequently isolated serovar. Comparison of Salmonella strains isolated from vultures and pig farms revealed that monophasic S. typhimurium 1,4,[5],12:i:-, S. Derby and S. Rissen strains were highly genetically homogeneous (similar DNA fingerprint). In conclusion, the current study indicates that free-living griffon vultures and pig farms that provide the carcasses at SFS share several zoonotic Salmonella strains. On this basis, and although transmission could be bidirectional, our result seems to corroborate the pig carcasses-to-vulture transmission and cross-infection at SFS. As an immediate Salmonella control strategy in wild avian scavengers, we suggest the implementation of a programme to guarantee that solely pig carcasses from Salmonella-free farms arrive at SFS.
Subject(s)
Falconiformes/microbiology , Salmonella typhimurium/growth & development , Animals , Animals, Wild , Birds , Spain , SwineABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of single and serial instillations of MitoGel into the upper urinary tract using a preclinical swine animal model. MitoGel is a novel sustained release formulation of mitomycin C (MMC) based on RTGel, a proprietary thermosensitive hydrogel technology. MitoGel is liquid at cold temperatures and solidifies to gel state at body temperature. It is intended as a treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma, given its ability to provide sustained release of MMC in the upper urinary tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We utilized 23 pigs in a 3-phase design. All animals underwent bilateral nephrostomy tube placement. During phase 1, 3 animals underwent antegrade RTGel instillation, imaging, and euthanasia within 12 hours. In phase 2, 10 pigs underwent single antegrade instillation, unilateral nephrectomy 3 days following instillation, and contralateral nephrectomy and euthanasia 30 days following instillation. During phase 3, 10 animals underwent 6 instillations over 3 weeks, followed by bilateral nephrectomy and necropsy 30 days postinstillation. MitoGel (2 mg/mL and 4 mg/mL), aqueous MMC (2 mg/mL and 4 mg/mL), and RTGel alone were evaluated. RESULTS: MitoGel remained visible within the pelvicalyceal system on fluoroscopic and computed tomography imaging for 4-6 hours. MMC plasma levels were well within acceptable safety thresholds. There was no evidence of urinary obstruction, acute kidney injury, sepsis, or myelosuppression. Histologic changes in the urinary system were mild and transient. CONCLUSION: Antegrade MitoGel delivery to the pelvicalyceal system of Yorkshire swine is feasible and safe. Further evaluation of MitoGel in human clinical trials is warranted.
