Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 36(11): 2263-2271, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28840370

ABSTRACT

Burkholderia sp. infections are extremely complex in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, especially considering the lack of knowledge regarding its behavior, its relationship with prognosis, as well as its transmissibility and multidrug resistance features. This study evaluated the frequency of chronic infection by Burkholderia, using microbiological and clinical data. Ninety-eight patients with CF attended from July 2011 to April 2014 in a Brazilian reference hospital were included. Antimicrobial activity, molecular epidemiology, Shwachman score, body mass index, exacerbations, and lung function were analyzed. Nine patients had chronic colonization, and all of them showed preserved pulmonary function levels, body mass index, and Shwachman score. Meropenem was the most effective antibiotic; however, divergent results were shown by other studies. Cross-contamination may have occurred in only two unrelated patients of different ages, who were colonized by B. vietnamiensis, which does not occur frequently. Twelve new sequence types (STs) were identified and three STs have presented intercontinental distribution. None of the patients presented known epidemic strains. In conclusion, a relatively low number of patients with chronic colonization and suspected cross-infection were identified. Different from other studies that have found CF patients chronically colonized with Burkholderia sp. having a greater deterioration of lung function, more frequent antibiotic therapy, and increased mortality, in the current study, the patients showed good clinical outcomes and favorable options for antibiotics therapy. This study also updated the epidemiological database, which facilitates the multicentric collaborative analysis and assists in the control of global infection by these pathogens.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Burkholderia Infections/drug therapy , Burkholderia Infections/epidemiology , Burkholderia cepacia complex/isolation & purification , Cystic Fibrosis/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Burkholderia Infections/complications , Burkholderia Infections/pathology , Burkholderia cepacia complex/classification , Burkholderia cepacia complex/genetics , Ceftazidime/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross Infection , Cystic Fibrosis/complications , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Infant , Lung/pathology , Male , Meropenem , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Typing , Respiratory Function Tests , Thienamycins/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Young Adult
2.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 39(1): 71-8, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16400466

ABSTRACT

Fitness improvement was used to compare morning with afternoon exercise periods for asthmatic children. Children with persistent moderate asthma (according to GINA criteria), 8 to 11 years old, were divided into 3 groups: morning training group (N = 23), afternoon training group (N = 23), and non-training group (N = 23). The program was based on twice a week 90-min sessions for 4 months. We measured the 9-min running distance, resting heart rate and abdominal muscle strength (sit-up number) before and after the training. All children took budesonide, 400 microg/day, and an on demand inhaled ss-agonist. The distance covered in 9 min increased (mean +/- SEM) from 1344 +/- 30 m by 248 +/- 30 m for the morning group, from 1327 +/- 30 m by 162 +/- 20 m for the afternoon group, and from 1310 +/- 20 m by 2 +/- 20 m for the control group (P < 0.05 for the comparison of morning and afternoon groups with the control group by ANOVA and P > 0.05 for morning with afternoon comparison). The reduction of resting heart rate from 83 +/- 1, 85 +/- 2 and 86 +/- 1 bpm was 5.1 +/- 0.8 bpm in the morning group, 4.4 +/- 0.8 bpm in the afternoon group, and -0.2 +/- 0.7 bpm in the control group (P > 0.05 for morning with afternoon comparison and P < 0.05 versus control). The number of sit-ups in the morning, afternoon and control groups increased from 22.0 +/- 1.7, 24.3 +/- 1.4 and 23 +/- 1.1 sit-ups by 9.8 +/- 0.9, 7.7 +/- 1.4, and 1.9 +/- 0.7 sit-ups, respectively (P > 0.05 for morning with afternoon comparison and P < 0.05 versus control). No statistically significant differences were detected between the morning and afternoon groups in terms of physical training of asthmatic children.


Subject(s)
Asthma/rehabilitation , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Abdominal Muscles/physiology , Albuterol/therapeutic use , Analysis of Variance , Asthma/drug therapy , Budesonide/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Child , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Heart Rate/physiology , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Function Tests , Severity of Illness Index
3.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 39(1): 71-78, Jan. 2006. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-419154

ABSTRACT

Fitness improvement was used to compare morning with afternoon exercise periods for asthmatic children. Children with persistent moderate asthma (according to GINA criteria), 8 to 11 years old, were divided into 3 groups: morning training group (N = 23), afternoon training group (N = 23), and non-training group (N = 23). The program was based on twice a week 90-min sessions for 4 months. We measured the 9-min running distance, resting heart rate and abdominal muscle strength (sit-up number) before and after the training. All children took budesonide, 400 æg/day, and an on demand inhaled ß-agonist. The distance covered in 9 min increased (mean ± SEM) from 1344 ± 30 m by 248 ± 30 m for the morning group, from 1327 ± 30 m by 162 ± 20 m for the afternoon group, and from 1310 ± 20 m by 2 ± 20 m for the control group (P < 0.05 for the comparison of morning and afternoon groups with the control group by ANOVA and P > 0.05 for morning with afternoon comparison). The reduction of resting heart rate from 83 ± 1, 85 ± 2 and 86 ± 1 bpm was 5.1 ± 0.8 bpm in the morning group, 4.4 ± 0.8 bpm in the afternoon group, and -0.2 ± 0.7 bpm in the control group (P > 0.05 for morning with afternoon comparison and P < 0.05 versus control). The number of sit-ups in the morning, afternoon and control groups increased from 22.0 ± 1.7, 24.3 ± 1.4 and 23 ± 1.1 sit-ups by 9.8 ± 0.9, 7.7 ± 1.4, and 1.9 ± 0.7 sit-ups, respectively (P > 0.05 for morning with afternoon comparison and P < 0.05 versus control). No statistically significant differences were detected between the morning and afternoon groups in terms of physical training of asthmatic children.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Asthma/rehabilitation , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Analysis of Variance , Abdominal Muscles/physiology , Albuterol/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Budesonide/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Heart Rate/physiology , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Function Tests , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...