Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 33(2): 95-101, 2023 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36069440

ABSTRACT

Suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy is a frequent clinical circumstance that influences antimicrobial prescription and often leads to the avoidable use of less efficacious and/or more toxic or costly drugs than first-line antimicrobials. Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in patients with antibiotic allergy labels has become one of the priorities of antimicrobial stewardship programs in several countries. These guidelines aim to make recommendations for the systematic approach to patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy based on current evidence. An expert panel (11 members of various scientific societies) formulated questions about the management of patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy. A systematic literature review was performed by a medical librarian. The questions were distributed among panel members who selected the most relevant references, summarized the evidence, and formulated graded recommendations when possible. The answers to all the questions were finally reviewed by all panel members. A systematic approach to patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy was recommended to improve antibiotic selection and, consequently, clinical outcomes. A clinically oriented, 3-category risk-stratification strategy was recommended for patients with suspected antibiotic allergy. Complementary assessments should consider both clinical risk category and preferred antibiotic agent. Empirical therapy recommendations for the most relevant clinical syndromes in patients with suspected or confirmed ß-lactam allergy were formulated, as were recommendations on the implementation and monitoring of the impact of the guidelines. Antimicrobial stewardship programs and allergists should design and implement activities that facilitate the most appropriate use of antibiotics in these patients.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , Drug Hypersensitivity , Hypersensitivity , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Humans , Coronary Care Units , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Drug Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy
2.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-219411

ABSTRACT

Suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy is a frequent clinical circumstance that influences antimicrobial prescription and often leads to the avoidable use of less efficacious and/or more toxic or costly drugs than first-line antimicrobials. Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in patients with antibiotic allergy labels has become one of the priorities of antimicrobial stewardship programs in several countries. These guidelines aim to make recommendations for the systematic approach to patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy based on current evidence. An expert panel (11 members of various scientific societies) formulated questions about the management of patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy. A systematic literature review was performed by a medical librarian. The questions were distributed among panel members who selected the most relevant references, summarized the evidence, and formulated graded recommendations when possible. The answers to all the questions were finally reviewed by all panel members. A systematic approach to patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy was recommended to improve antibiotic selection and, consequently, clinical outcomes. A clinically oriented, 3-category risk-stratification strategy was recommended for patients with suspected antibiotic allergy. Complementary assessments should consider both clinical risk category and preferred antibiotic agent. Empirical therapy recommendations for the most relevant clinical syndromes in patients with suspected or confirmed ß-lactam allergy were formulated, as were recommendations on the implementation and monitoring of the impact of the guidelines. Antimicrobial stewardship programs and allergists should design and implement activities that facilitate the most appropriate use of antibiotics in these patients (AU)


En la práctica clínica, un antecedente de alergia a los antibióticos, confirmada o sospechada, es frecuente y condiciona la selección de antibióticos, requiriendo con frecuencia el uso de fármacos menos eficaces, más tóxicos o más caros que los antibióticos de primera línea. La optimización del uso de antibióticos en pacientes con este antecedente es una de las prioridades de los programas de optimización de uso de antibióticos (PROA) en varios países. Estas guías pretenden formular recomendaciones para evaluar de una manera sistemática a estos pacientes mediante una aproximación basada en la evidencia. Un panel multidisciplinar constituido por alergólogos, infectólogos, farmacéuticos hospitalarios e intensivistas formularon una serie de preguntas sobre el manejo de estos pacientes; una documentalista realizó la revisión bibliográfica. Las preguntas se distribuyeron entre los miembros del grupo de trabajo, quienes seleccionaron las referencias más relevantes y formularon las correspondientes recomendaciones, que fueron revisadas y aprobadas por todos los miembros del grupo. Es necesaria una aproximación sistemática a los pacientes con antecedentes de alergia a antibióticos para optimizar la selección del tratamiento antibiótico y mejorar los resultados clínicos de estos pacientes cuando precisan antibioterapia. El presente documento recomienda una estrategia de estratificación clínica del riesgo en 3 categorías. La recomendación de realizar evaluaciones complementarias se basa en el riesgo clínico y el antibiótico de primera línea necesario. Además, se formulan recomendaciones de tratamiento antibiótico empírico para los principales síndromes infecciosos en pacientes con alergia confirmada o sospechada. Finalmente, se formulan recomendaciones sobre la implementación y monitorización del impacto de las recomendaciones de la guía (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Societies, Medical , Skin Tests , Spain
3.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 31(2): 120-131, 2021 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31833477

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Allergology has been a recognized medical specialty in Spain, with fully defined aims and competencies for more than 4 decades. However, in recent years, its visibility seems to have decreased somewhat. Objectives: To identify which specific factors have contributed to the waning of the importance of the specialty and find tangible solutions to consolidate its place as a front-line medical specialty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online population survey comprising 60 items of interest was prepared. The degree of agreement and the level of satisfaction with each item were assessed, and implementable initiatives in the short, medium, and long terms were defined in order to provide solutions to the issues identified. RESULTS: The survey was completed by a total of 167 specialists with an average of 18 years' experience. Most were from public reference hospitals, and 29.3% were heads of department. The line of action for which a good degree of agreement was achieved was to promote the inclusion of an allergist in multidisciplinary teams. The priority lines of action were to improve undergraduate and graduate training in allergology and specialized nursing, to identify curricula in Spain, and to develop robust teaching projects. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed a high degree of homogeneity between professionals. The basic pillars highlighted were as follows: quality training, knowledge, and research in immunotherapy; an innovative portfolio of services endorsed by clinical practice guidelines; and presence in multidisciplinary teams and relevant hospital committees.


Subject(s)
Allergy and Immunology/trends , Career Choice , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Biomedical Research , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Medicine , Spain/epidemiology
4.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 31(2): 120-131, 2021. graf, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-215184

ABSTRACT

Background: Allergology has been a recognized medical specialty in Spain, with fully defined aims and competencies for more than 4 decades. However, in recent years, its visibility seems to have decreased somewhat. Objectives: To identify which specific factors have contributed to the waning of the importance of the specialty and find tangible solutions to consolidate its place as a front-line medical specialty. Material and methods: An online population survey comprising 60 items of interest was prepared. The degree of agreement and the level of satisfaction with each item were assessed, and implementable initiatives in the short, medium, and long terms were defined in order to provide solutions to the issues identified. Results: The survey was completed by a total of 167 specialists with an average of 18 years’ experience. Most were from public reference hospitals, and 29.3% were heads of department. The line of action for which a good degree of agreement was achieved was to promote the inclusion of an allergist in multidisciplinary teams. The priority lines of action were to improve undergraduate and graduate training in allergology and specialized nursing, to identify curricula in Spain, and to develop robust teaching projects. Conclusions: The results revealed a high degree of homogeneity between professionals. The basic pillars highlighted were as follows: quality training, knowledge, and research in immunotherapy; an innovative portfolio of services endorsed by clinical practice guidelines; and presence in multidisciplinary teams and relevant hospital committees. (AU)


Antecedentes: En nuestro país, la alergología constituye una especialidad médica reconocida con fines y competencias completamente definidos desde hace más de cuatro décadas. Sin embargo, en los últimos tiempos parece hacer frente a una cierta disminución de su visibilidad y reconocimiento. Objetivos: Identificar qué factores específicos contribuyen a esta dilución de su peso específico y buscar soluciones tangibles que la afiancen como especialidad médica de primera línea. Material y métodos: Se elaboró una encuesta poblacional online compuesta por 60 ítems considerados de interés. Se valoró el grado de acuerdo y el nivel de satisfacción con cada uno, definiendo iniciativas implantables a corto, medio y largo plazo que aporten soluciones para las cuestiones identificadas. Resultados: La encuesta fue respondida por un total de 167 especialistas con una media de 18 años de experiencia, la mayoría procedentes de hospitales de referencia públicos, siendo un 29,3% jefes del servicio. La línea de acción que obtuvo un mayor grado de acuerdo fue promover la presencia del alergólogo en los equipos multidisciplinares. Como línea de acción más prioritaria se seleccionó mejorar la formación de pregrado y posgrado en alergología, así como la de enfermería especializada, identificando planes de estudio en nuestro país y elaborando proyectos docentes robustos. Conclusiones: Los resultados revelaron un elevado grado de homogeneidad entre los profesionales, destacando como pilares básicos la formación de calidad, los conocimientos e investigación en inmunoterapia, una cartera de servicios novedosa avalada por Guías de Práctica Clínica y la presencia en equipos multidisciplinares y comisiones hospitalarias relevantes. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Allergy and Immunology/trends , Biomedical Research , Career Choice , Interdisciplinary Communication , Spain
5.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 26(3): 144-55; quiz 2 p following 155, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27326981

ABSTRACT

The objective of these guidelines is to ensure efficient and effective clinical practice. The panel of experts who produced this consensus document developed a research protocol based on a review of the literature. The prevalence of allergic reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) is estimated to be 1:170 000, that is, 0.05%-0.1% of patients undergoing radiologic studies with ICM (more than 75 million examinations per year worldwide). Hypersensitivity reactions can appear within the first hour after administration (immediate reactions) or from more than 1 hour to several days after administration (nonimmediate or delayed reactions). The risk factors for immediate reactions include poorly controlled bronchial asthma, concomitant medication (eg, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ß-blockers, and proton-pump inhibitors), rapid administration of the ICM, mastocytosis, autoimmune diseases, and viral infections. The most common symptoms of immediate reactions are erythema and urticaria with or without angioedema, which appear in more than 70% of patients. Maculopapular rash is the most common skin feature of nonimmediate reactions (30%-90%). Skin and in vitro tests should be performed for diagnosis of both immediate and nonimmediate reactions. The ICM to be administered will therefore be chosen depending on the results of these tests, the ICM that induced the reaction (when known), the severity of the reaction, the availability of alternative ICM, and the information available on potential ICM cross-reactivity. Another type of contrast media, gadolinium derivatives, is used used for magnetic resonance imaging. Although rare, IgE-mediated reactions to gadolinium derivatives have been reported.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Algorithms , Cross Reactions , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Humans , Skin Tests
6.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 25(4): 259-69, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26310040

ABSTRACT

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used worldwide and are responsible for several types of drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) in all age groups. The 2 major groups of DHRs to NSAIDs are those induced by immunological mechanisms (selective reactions) and those where inflammatory mediators are released through activation of the prostaglandin-leukotriene pathway without specific immunological recognition (cross-intolerance). In the present review, we focus on cross-intolerance reactions, which are the most frequent DHRs and are becoming a topic of major interest in children and adolescents. Paracetamol and ibuprofen are the drugs that most frequently cause DHRs in children; other NSAIDs are responsible for reactions in adolescents. In vivo and in vitro tests are of limited diagnostic value, with some exceptions for the less common selective reactions. In cross-intolerance, the clinical history and controlled administration are in many instances the only way to establish a diagnosis and look for alternatives. The clinical history is diagnostic when consistent symptoms occur repeatedly after exposure to NSAIDs with different chemical structures. Cutaneous and respiratory symptoms often co-occur in young children. The natural history of these reactions in children is unknown, and some patients can develop tolerance over time. Atopy remains a major risk factor for cross-intolerant reactions. The increasing interest in hypersensitivity to NSAIDs with improvements in patient phenotyping and the information provided by pharmacogenetics will improve our understanding and management of these reactions in the near future.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Adolescent , Child , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Humans , Risk Factors
7.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 21(7): 496-506, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22312932

ABSTRACT

The Drug Allergy Committee of the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology reviewed the allergenic potential of several substances of food origin that are found in the composition of some drugs. Despite recent legislation on labeling, many labels do not clearly state whether the drug contains raw material (active ingredients, excipient, or other manufacturing intermediate) with an origin in any of the substances in the list of the 14 groups of food allergens that are subject to mandatory declaration. The objective of legislation is that the drug package, the Summary of Product Characteristics, and the patient information leaflet clearly state the food content in order to improve the safety of allergic patients. Therefore, any food or allergen derivative that must be declared should be clearly stated on the drug label. Of all the evaluated products, egg and milk derivatives are the most frequently discussed in literature reviews. The natural or synthetic origin of potentially allergenic substances such as lysozyme, casein, lactose, albumin, phosphatide, and aromatic essences should be clearly stated. Providing this information has 2 clear advantages. First, allergic reactions to drugs in patients with food allergy could be avoided (if the substances have a natural origin). Second, prescription would improve by not restricting drugs containing synthetic substances (which do not usually induce allergic reactions).


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Food Additives/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Glucosamine/adverse effects , Humans , Lactose/adverse effects , Muramidase/adverse effects , Ovalbumin/adverse effects , Propofol/adverse effects , Spain
8.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 100(3): 146-52, 2008 Mar.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18416639

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Anisakis simplex can be a cause of digestive symptoms. Our aim was to evaluate the epidemiological antecedents and immunological data available for a differentiation between patients with anisakidosis and those with other acute abdominal problems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: this is a prospective cohort study involving 134 patients with acute abdominal problems: 52 patients were diagnosed with anisakidosis by means of surgical and pathological findings and/or specific IgE seroconversion against Anisakis simplex (group A), and in 82 patients anisakidosis had been ruled out (group NA: non-anisakidosis). We evaluated the antecedent of raw fish ingestion, the skin prick test, and IgE immunoblotting as diagnostic tools. RESULTS: patients in groups A and NA differ in terms of prior raw fish ingestion (p < 0.0001) and positive SPT (p < 0.0001), with their respective negative predictive values (NPV) being 98.39% (95%CI: 90.17-99.92) and 95.56% (95%CI: 83.64-99.23). Regarding immunoblotting, in 86.2% of patients in group A a band of 60 kDa was detected, which was also detected in 19.2% of patients in group NA. CONCLUSIONS: a negative answer to the question about raw or undercooked fish ingestion has very high sensitivity and NPV (98.39%), and is thus reasonably reliable to rule out anisakidosis. The absence of cutaneous sensitization to crude A. simplex extract gives a high probability (95.56%) that the illness is absent. The presence of a band of about 60 kDa in immunoblotting would be useful for diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Abdomen, Acute/parasitology , Anisakiasis/diagnosis , Anisakiasis/immunology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...