ABSTRACT
The use of medical ozone in the treatment of chronic pain is progressively expanding in Spain and today it is used both in public and private medical centers. However, there is a great lack of knowledge about this technology not only in primary care but also in medical specialties. Although its biochemical bases are well determined and there are various systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the literature that justify its use in pain medicine, some professionals still are prejudiced against it. The evidence level of using medical ozone according SIGN (Scotish Intercollegiate Guideline Network) criteria is similar or superior to most of the techniques used in a Pain Unit. In this paper, we have done a review on ozone therapy in pain medicine, compiling the evidence published about it.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pediatric spinal anesthesia is an old technique whose use is not widespread, in spite of reducing the risk of cardiorespiratory events (hypoxemia, bradycardia, and hypotension) associated with general anesthesia, especially in neonates and infants. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the pediatric spinal anesthesia program at our tertiary care hospital over 11 years. METHODS: Two hundred children, between 8 days and 13 years of age, who underwent lower body surgery under spinal anesthesia from May 2010 to July 2021 were included. Demographic and procedural data were collected, and success, failure, and complication rates calculated. RESULTS: The success rate was 97.5% (n = 195). The incidence of complications was 2% (n = 4). They were 2 cases of intraoperative hypoxemia and 2 cases of postoperative postdural puncture headache , and they quickly resolved with no sequelae. CONCLUSION: Pediatric spinal anesthesia is a safe and effective technique with good acceptance among anesthesiologists. Thus, the implementation of a pediatric spinal anesthesia program at a tertiary care hospital is feasible and affordable.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Spinal , Post-Dural Puncture Headache , Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Child , Humans , Hypoxia , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
Despite the advances in pediatric anesthesia, infants have higher mortality and critical incidents rates than children, especially ex-prematures and those with comorbidity. We present the case of a high-risk infant who underwent elective laparoscopic gastrostomy under opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) combined with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with Dexmedetomidine (DEX). Perioperative opioids were entirely avoided, and intraoperative anesthetics and postoperative analgesic were considerably reduced. The infant showed cardiorespiratory stability and optimal analgesia during the uneventful procedure and the postoperative period. We consider OFA and TAP block with DEX a safe and effective anesthetic combination for high-risk infants.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Endoscopy , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/diagnostic imaging , PatientsABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Gastrointestinal Contents/diagnostic imaging , Surgical Clearance , Ultrasonography/methods , Point-of-Care Testing , Preoperative Care , Quality Assurance, Health CareABSTRACT
Risk management in healthcare institutions begins by first identifying the potential risks within a certain organization or specific area and then goes on to develop further strategies to reduce harm. The most common tool for this type of analysis is Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT). METHODS: We conducted a SWOT analysis in our pediatric anesthesia program: key factors were identified in a matrix, prioritized in a score table, represented in a graph, and finally analyzed. RESULTS: Items obtained partial scores from 20 to 120. The item "lack of clinical protocols" was given greater weight (60) and received a lower value (1), resulting in the highest partial score (60) among the negative key factors and indicating a need for greater efforts to improve this specific aspect. CONCLUSION: The SWOT tool proved effective in identifying safety and quality key factors, and it provided information for initiating an improvement program.
ABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Spinal Puncture/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Spinal anesthesia is practical and safe in infants and toddlers and prevents perioperative complications including cardiorespiratory instability and apnea. Other perioperative advantages include reduced time from surgery completion to operating room exit and first feed. This article presents the case of an ex-premature infant who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia. The infant remained calm and stable throughout the uneventful procedure and postoperative period. Spinal anesthesia may be feasible for laparoscopic herniotomy when pneumoperitoneum pressure and operative time are restricted to 8 mm Hg and 60 minutes, respectively, with sensory level at T10 or higher.
