[Vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged non-prolapse uterus using morcellation techniques and/or Deschamps needle: a retrospective cohort study]. / Histerectomía vaginal para úteros grandes y sin prolapso mediante morcelación y aguja de Deschamps.

OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical outcomes in women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with enlarged (> 12 weeks size) and non-prolapsed uterus utilizing different morcellation techniques with or without concomitant Deschamps needle use to vaginal hysterectomy for prolapsed uterus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy performed between January 2009 and June 2014 in the National Institute of Perinatology. The study group comprised 48 women who had vaginal hysterectomy with enlarged and non-prolapsed uterus in which were utilized different morcellation techniques with or without concomitant Deschamps needle use and 50 women who had vaginal hysterectomy for prolapsed uterus served as control. RESULTS: The groups had statistical difference in age, number of cesarean sections, body mass index (BMI), grade of prolapse (Point Cx and D with POPQ quantification system) and surgical prediagnosis (p < 0.001); mean uterus weight was 182.5 g and 106 g, respectively (p < 0.001), as well as for transverse and antero-posterior dimensions and realization of morcellation with or without use of Deschamps needle. Both groups had no statistical difference in preoperative hemoglobin, concomitant surgeries for incontinence and prolapsed, estimated blood loss, operation time, length of stay and complications. CONCLUSION: Vaginal hysterectomy utilizing different morcellation techniques with or without concomitant Deschamps needle use in women with enlarged and non-prolapsed uterus is safe, effective, and with similar complications to vaginal hysterectomies in prolapse uterus.

[Vaginal impingement of uterine arteries (Zea technique) prior to cervical curettage in cervical ectopic pregnancy: three case report and literature review]. / Pinzamiento de arterias uterinas por vía vaginal previo a legrado cervical en embarazo ectópico cervical: reporte de tres casos y revisión bibliogrifica.

Cervical ectopic pregnancy is a rare and danger clinical presentation because it has high risk of massive bleeding. The incidence is reported in 1:2500 pregnancies and has high relation with a history of cervical dilatation and curettage and assisted reproductive techniques. Advances in ultrasound resolution and use of beta fraction of human chorionic gonadotropin allow early diagnosis and provide conservative treatment with decreased morbidity, mortality and fertility preservation. Various techniques have been reported associated with cervical curettage, to reduce bleeding at the implantation site. In this report three cases of cervical ectopic pregnancy managed with cervical curettage, prior vaginal impingement of uterine arteries (Zea Technique) at the Instituto Nacional de Perinatología Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes are described. The Zea technique represents an effective option in the control of obstetric hemorrhage, including patients diagnosed with cervical ectopic pregnancy in who the bleeding volume decrease after its placement. The Zea Technique is easy to apply and preserves fertility. The success of combining this technique with endocervical curettage for the management of cervical ectopic pregnancy is demonstrated. Training for performing this technique does not require highly specialized or highly complex resources since the required material is the usual every area of obstetric care.