Is bronchial provocation test positivity associated with blood eosinophil count and cut-off value?

OBJECTIVE: Asthma is characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness due to chronic inflammation in the airways. One of the main cells involved in airway inflammation is eosinophils. In the current study, a bronchial provocation test (BPT) was performed to demonstrate airway hyperresponsiveness. We investigated the relationship between BPT and blood eosinophil count and the cut-off value of blood eosinophil count. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the data of 246 patients who visited our immunology and allergy clinic, a tertiary reference center, with asthma symptoms between May 2017 and March 2020 and underwent BPT with methacholine for the diagnosis of asthma. The cases were grouped according to the level of BPT positivity and negativity. RESULTS: Of 246 patients, BPT was positive in 90 (36.6%) and negative in 156 (63.4%). The blood eosinophil measurement of the BPT-positive cases was found to be statistically significantly higher than that of the BPT-negative cases (135 vs. 119 cells/µl, respectively, p=0.029). When BPT is grouped according to positivity levels, there was no statistically significant difference in blood eosinophil measurements between subgroups (p=0.174). As a result of the evaluations, the cut-off point obtained for the blood eosinophil count was determined as ≥226 cells/µl. For the blood eosinophil count, for the cut-off value of ≥226 cells/µl, sensitivity was 30.0%, specificity 87.7%, positive predictive value 58.7%, and negative predictive value 68.3%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that BPT positivity is associated with blood eosinophil count. The cut-off value (≥226 cells/µl) determined for blood eosinophil count may be helpful when planning BPT and evaluating the diagnosis of asthma.

Reasons for non-vaccination during national immunization days: a case study in Istanbul, Turkey.

OBJECTIVE: The member states of the 41st World Health Assembly agreed to aim for the global eradication of polio by the year 2000. Turkey adopted this goal and made substantial progress. In this report, we present the results of a coverage and risk factor survey conducted to evaluate vaccine delivery during the 1999 national immunization days (NIDs) in a large district of Istanbul, Turkey. This study provides important information regarding risk factors and reasons for non-vaccination during the NIDs, defines rumours about the NIDs, and provides estimates of vaccination coverage. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A survey was conducted 3-10 days after the second round of 1999 NIDs using the standard expanded programme on immunization cluster survey method, for each of 10 health centre areas in Umraniye. In total, 2102 children were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The vaccination coverage rate was 82.2%. Logistic regression analysis showed increased risk of non-vaccination in people who did not know the purpose of the NIDs, who had not had contact with a mobile vaccination team, who were unvaccinated in the first round of 1999 NIDs and who lived in the area of the Central Health Centre. Use of primary-level state healthcare facilities for routine childhood immunizations, and living in the area of the Adem Yavuz Health Centre had significant positive effects on vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve better results, better publicity of national campaigns using mass media, and improved use of mobile teams, are necessary.