Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 42(9): 20130235, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24005061

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of soft-tissue simulation materials on dental and bone tissue radiographic densities using pixel intensity (PI) and digital subtraction radiography (DSR) analyses. METHODS: 15 dry human mandibles were divided into halves. Each half was radiographed using a charge-coupled device sensor without a soft-tissue simulation material (Wm) and with 5 types of materials: acrylic (Ac), wax (Wx), water (Wt), wood (Wd) and frozen bovine tissue (Bt). Three thicknesses were tested for each material: 10 mm, 15 mm and 20 mm. The material was positioned in front of the mandible and the sensor parallel to the molar region. The radiation beam was perpendicular to the sensor at 30 cm focal spot-to-object distance. The digital images of the bone and dental tissue were captured for PI analyses. The subtracted images were marked with 14 landmark magnifications, and 2 areas of analyses were defined, forming the regions of interest. Shapiro-Wilk and Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by Dunn's post-test were used (p < 0.05). RESULTS: DSR showed that both the material type and the thickness tested influenced the gain of density in bone tissue (p < 0.05). PI analyses of the bone region did not show these differences, except for the lower density observed in the image without soft-tissue simulation material. In the dental region, both DSR and PI showed that soft-tissue simulators did not influence the density in these regions. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the materials evaluated and their thicknesses significantly influenced the density-level gain in alveolar bone. In dental tissues, there was no density-level gain with any soft-tissue material tested.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon , Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Bone Density , Radiography, Dental, Digital , Subtraction Technique , Acrylic Resins , Animals , Bone and Bones/diagnostic imaging , Cattle , Humans , Inlay Casting Wax , Radiography, Dental, Digital/methods , Semiconductors , Statistics, Nonparametric , Water , Wood
2.
Int Endod J ; 44(5): 469-73, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21276021

ABSTRACT

AIM: To compare the efficacy of different digital radiographic imaging systems for determining the length of endodontic files. METHODOLOGY: K-type endodontic files were introduced into the canals of 40 extracted human permanent single-rooted teeth and fixed in place at random lengths. The teeth were radiographed using Digora Optime, CygnusRay MPS and CDR Wireless digital imaging systems. Six observers measured every file length in all the images and repeated this procedure in 50% of the image samples, and assigned a score to the level of difficulty found. Analysis of variance for differences between digital systems and Tukey's test were performed. The level of intraobserver agreement was measured by intraclass correlation. The assigned scores were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests. RESULTS: The CDR Wireless values did not differ significantly from the actual lengths and the CygnusRay MPS values. The Digora Optime system was significantly different from the others and overestimated the values (P ≤ 0.05). The Digora Optime was significantly easier to use for taking measurements and the CygnusRay MPS the most difficult (P ≤ 0.05). All digital radiographic imaging systems showed excellent agreement with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient >0.95. CONCLUSIONS: The three digital radiographic imaging systems were precise. The CDR Wireless system was significantly more accurate in determining endodontic file lengths, and similarly to Digora Optime, was considered the least difficult to use when assessing endodontic file lengths.


Subject(s)
Dental Instruments , Dental Pulp Cavity/diagnostic imaging , Odontometry/instrumentation , Radiography, Dental, Digital/methods , Root Canal Preparation/instrumentation , Analysis of Variance , Dental Pulp Cavity/anatomy & histology , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Observer Variation , Odontometry/methods , Radiography, Dental, Digital/instrumentation , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Statistics, Nonparametric
3.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 39(1): 23-7, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20089740

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of alternative erasing times of DenOptix(R) (Dentsply/Gendex, Chicargo, IL) digital plates on subjective image quality and the probability of double exposure image not occurring. METHODS: Human teeth were X-rayed with phosphor plates using ten different erasing times. Two observers evaluated the images for subjective image quality (sharpness, brightness, contrast, enamel definition, dentin definition and dentin-enamel junction definition) and for the presence or absence of double exposure image. Spearman's correlation analysis and ANOVA was performed to verify the existence of a linear association between the subjective image quality parameters and the alternative erasing times. A contingency table was constructed to evaluate the agreement among the observers, and a binominal logistic regression was performed to verify the correlation between the erasing time and the probability of double exposure image not occurring. RESULTS: All 6 parameters of image quality were rated high by the examiners for the erasing times between 25 s and 130 s. The same erasing time range, from 25 to 130 s, was considered a safe erasing time interval, with no probability of a double exposure image occurring. CONCLUSIONS: The alternative erasing times from 25 s to 130 s showed high image quality and no probability of double image occurrence. Thus, it is possible to reduce the operating time of the DenOptix(R) digital system without jeopardizing the diagnostic task.


Subject(s)
Radiography, Dental, Digital/instrumentation , X-Ray Intensifying Screens , Dental Enamel/diagnostic imaging , Dentin/diagnostic imaging , Equipment Reuse , Humans , Light , Logistic Models , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...