Antibacterial effects of children's and adults' toothpastes containing different amounts of fluoride: An in vitro study.

Background: In recent years, fluoride concentrations in toothpaste for children and adults have increased. However, the effects of different concentrations on bacterial activity have rarely been compared. We aimed to investigate and compare the antibacterial activity of children's and adults' toothpaste containing 500, 1000‒1100, and 1450‒1500 ppm fluoride. Methods: Three strains of bacteria (Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus salivarius, and Lactobacillus casei) were cultured in brain heart infusion agar. Thirty commercially available toothpaste products for children and adults containing 500, 1000‒1100, and 1450‒1500 ppm fluoride were selected and tested. Toothpaste's ability to inhibit bacterial growth was evaluated by agar diffusion assay, in which plates were incubated for 24 hours, and then the diameter of the microbial inhibition zone was measured. Comparisons between children's and adults' fluoride toothpastes were made using the Mann-Whitney U test. The association between bacterial growth inhibition and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) was analyzed by the chi-square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: No difference in the inhibition zone was observed for different fluoride concentrations. However, there were significant differences between toothpastes for children and adults, with higher inhibition zones for adults' toothpastes. Most toothpastes for adults contained SLS, which was associated with antibacterial activity. Conclusion: Fluoride concentrations ranging from 500 to 1500 ppm did not affect bacterial growth. The antibacterial activity of toothpastes for adults was significantly higher than that of toothpastes for children, which was mainly attributed to the SLS usually added to adult formulations.

Evaluation of Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation and Acidogenicity of Infant Milk Formulas for Treating Cow Milk Allergy: An in vitro Study.

INTRODUCTION: When infants cannot consume breast milk, the most commonly available alternative milk formula is cow milk-based. Due to a rise in the prevalence of cow milk protein allergy (CMPA) among children, this study aimed to assess the biofilm formation and acidogenicity of cow milk-based formulas as well as milk formulas suggested for children with CMPA. METHODS: Cow milk-based formulas with 0%, 10%, or 18% sucrose added, partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF), extensively hydrolyzed formula (eHF), amino acid-based formula (AAF), and soy-based formulas with 0%, or 11% sucrose added were evaluated. Streptococcus mutans was used as a representative microorganism associated with caries. The acidogenicity after 24-h incubation was assessed by the pH of the formed biofilm and lactic acid formation. Biofilm formation was quantified using crystal violet staining. Additionally, the biofilm characteristics were determined using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Comparisons were made among formulas without added sucrose to observe protein-based differences. Furthermore, formulas with different sucrose percentages were compared to explore the impact of sucrose content. RESULTS: When comparing the formulas without added sucrose, the biofilm formation in the cow milk-based formula and pHF were significantly greater than the soy-based formula, eHF, and AAF. In the presence of S. mutans, all formulas reduced the biofilm pH below the critical enamel pH. The cow milk-based formula and AAF showed a significantly lower biofilm pH than the pHF, soy-based, and eHF groups, while the lactic acid production was markedly higher in the cow milk-based formula, pHF and AAF, compared with the eHF and soy-based formula. Adding sucrose into the cow milk-based and soy-based formulas substantially increased biofilm mass. The biofilm pH of the cow milk-based formulas, with or without sucrose, was significantly lower than that of the soy-based formulas. The CLSM indicated distinct biofilm characteristics among the different protein-based formulas, with sucrose supplementation promoting S. mutans aggregation in cow milk-based formula biofilm and increased density and intact biofilm in the soy-based formula. CONCLUSION: All assessed milk formulas had caries-inducing factors, including those without supplemental sucrose. Among them, the eHF demonstrated the least caries-inducing factors, attributed to its minimal biofilm formation and the highest biofilm pH.

Effects of two novel denture cleansers on multispecies microbial biofilms, stain removal and the denture surface: an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: The continuously increasing demand for removable denture appliances and the importance of adequate denture cleaning have led to the development of various denture cleansing products. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two novel denture cleansing agents (GE and TM) and three commonly available cleansers (0.5% sodium hypochlorite; NaClO, 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate; CHX, and Polident®; POL) on multispecies microbial biofilm formation, stain removal and physical properties of dentures. METHODS: The antimicrobial activities of denture cleansing agents were determined against major oral opportunistic pathogens including Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans, using time-kill assays. Multispecies microbial biofilms grown on acrylic resins for 72 h were generated to determine the antibiofilm effects of cleansing agents by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Evaluations of the tea and coffee stain removal properties and the alterations in the physical properties of dentures were also performed. The toxicity of cleanser residues released from denture acrylics to fibroblast cells was investigated using MTT assay. RESULTS: All denture cleansing agents tested could effectively kill oral bacteria and Candida albicans. Furthermore, after immersion for more than 3 h, the cleansers Polident®, GE and TM could efficiently penetrate and inhibit multispecies denture biofilms with effects similar to 10 min of immersion in 0.5% NaClO. However, immersion in 0.12% CHX for 20 min showed less antibiofilm activity. The NaClO solution had the highest efficacy for removing stains from the artificial teeth. Conversely, the CHX solution enhanced tea and coffee staining, and the teeth immersed in this solution showed clinically unacceptable colour changes (ΔE > 5.5). However, the colour differences of teeth stained and immersed in POL, GE and TM cleansers were in the clinically acceptable range. There was no significant difference among the POL, GE and TM cleansers in terms of stain removal efficacy. The cleansers GE and TM did not alter the surface roughness and colour of the materials, moreover the residues of both cleansers did not exhibit cytotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Two novel denture cleansing agents containing natural products, GE and TM exhibited effective antimicrobial activity, antibiofilm and stain removal capabilities without toxicity or disturbance of the physical properties of acrylics.