Effectiveness of Epidural Steroid Injection Depending on Discoradicular Contact: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Lumbar radicular pain is a major public health and economic problem. It is among the most common reasons for professional disability. The most common cause of lumbar radicular pain is intervertebral disc herniation, which results from degenerative disc changes. The dominant pain mechanisms are direct pressure of the hernia on the nerve root and the local inflammatory process triggered by intervertebral disc herniation. Treatment of lumbar radicular pain includes conservative, minimally invasive, and surgical treatment. The number of minimally invasive procedures is constantly increasing, and among these methods is epidural administration of steroids and local anesthetic through a transforaminal approach (ESI TF). The aim of this research was to examine the effectiveness of ESI TF as measured by a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), depending on whether there is contact between the herniated intervertebral disc and the nerve root. In both groups of participants, there was a significant reduction in pain intensity, but there was no significant difference between the groups. In the group with disc herniation and nerve root contact, the only significant reduction was in pain intensity (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in measurements in other domains of the ODI. In the group without disc herniation and nerve contact, there was a significant difference in all domains except weight lifting. In the group without contact, there was significant improvement after 1 month (p = 0.001) and 3 months (p < 0.001) according to the ODI, while there was no significant improvement in the group with contact. In addition, there were no significant differences in the distribution of participants based on the ODI and whether disc herniation and nerve contact was present. The results suggest that transforaminal epidural administration of steroids is a clinically effective method for treating lumbar radicular pain caused by intervertebral disc herniation in people with and without nerve root contact, without significant differences.

Effect of Pre-Emptive Paracetamol Infusion on Postoperative Analgesic Consumption in Children Undergoing Elective Herniorrhaphy.

OBJECTIVE: Studies have suggested that pre-emptive analgesia may decrease postoperative pain and opioid consumption. This study was undertaken to determine whether pre-emptive analgesia reduces postoperative pain and total paracetamol and opioid consumption in children undergoing herniorrhaphy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, medical records were analysed before and after the pre-emptive analgesia regimen was introduced. Demographic data, perioperative drug consumption and discharge time were recorded. In the first group, no pre-emptive analgesia (NA; year, 2011; n=60) was given and in the second group, the pre-emptive analgesia (PA) paracetamol 10-15 mg kg-1 was given intravenously in the surgical ward at least 1 h before the surgical procedure (year 2013; n=60). Postoperative pain determining supplemental pain medications was scored using a Faces Pain Scale or visual analogue scale. Total paracetamol and opioid consumption during 24 perioperative hours was registered for all patients. The statistical analysis was performed using t test and Chi-square test. RESULTS: The mean age of children was 69.6±49.9 and 58.7±32.4 months (p=0.157), and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 18.3±8.8 kg m-2 and 16.4±3.7 kg m-2 (p=0.125) in the NA and PA groups, respectively. Total paracetamol consumption was 1157.8±908.8 mg vs. 983.0±536.4 mg (p=0.202), and the total opioid consumption was 5.8±4.7 in the NA group and 7.0±4.6 morphine equivalents in the PA group (p=0.160). No differences in the discharge time between the groups were observed (2.1±0.3 vs. 2.0±0.3 days, p=0.13). CONCLUSION: PA was proven to be efficient in the terms of postoperative pain control but did not reduce the overall analgesic drug consumption in the children undergoing elective herniorrhaphy. Multimodal pain treatment may decrease the consumption of analgesic drugs.

In-hospital cardiac arrest: can we change something?

Cardiac arrest is classified as 'in-hospital' if it occurs in a hospitalised patient who had a pulse at the time of admission. A probability of patient's survival until hospital discharge is very low. The reasons for this are old age, multiple co-morbidity of patients, late recognition of cardiac arrest, poor knowledge about basic life support algorithm, insufficient equipment, absence of qualified resuscitation teams (RTs) and poor organization.The aim of this study was to demonstrate characteristics of in-hospital cardiac arrests and resuscitation measures in University Hospital Osijek. We analysed retrospectively all resuscitation procedures data where anaesthesiology RTs provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during 5-year period.We analysed 309 in-hospital resuscitation attempts with complete documentation. Victims of cardiac arrest were principally elderly patients, neurological (30.4 %), surgical (25.24 %) and neurosurgical patients (15.2 %) with many associated severe diseases. In 85.6 % of the cases, resuscitation was initiated by ward personnel and RTs arrived within 5 min in 67 % of the cases. However, in 14.6 % of the cases resuscitation measures had not been started before RT arrival. We found statistical correlation between lower initial survival rates and length of hospital stay (p = 0.001), presence of cerebral ischemia (p = 0.026) or cardiomyopathy (p = 0.004) and duration of CPR (p = 0.041). Initial survival was very low (14.6 %), and full recovery was accomplished in only eight patients out of 309 (2.59 %).Identification of terminal chronic patients in which the CPR is not reasonable, a better organisation and ward personnel education can contribute to better overall success.

Side distinct sciatic nerve recovery differences between rats and mice.

The Sciatic Functional Index (SFI) is widely used to evaluate functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury, primarily in the rat, and more recently shown useful in the mouse. This quantitative, non-invasive method allows tracking of regeneration capability, visible in the gait of the animal. Using a Martin micro needle holder, carrying a force measured to be 49.2 N, the left sciatic nerve was crushed for 60 s. We accumulated data from walking tracks collected preoperatively and 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after injury. SFI values were first calculated in the traditional manner. Then using the preoperative values as the normal value in the postoperative calculations, SFI was again calculated; this isolated the calculations to either injured or contra lateral leg giving a "split" plot. The traditional SFI calculations resulted in typical shaped graphs for both rats and mice. However, the "split" SFI calculations showed how rats and mice differ in their recovery from sciatic nerve injury. The mouse graph shows the intact leg remaining stable and the injured leg having functional impairment, which then recovers. The rat graph showed functional impairment of the injured leg, however, the intact leg had an increase in SFI values as if to compensate until the injured leg showed recovery.

Activity cage as a method to analyze functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury in mice.

The aim of this paper is to show the activity cage as a viable method for tracking functional nerve recovery. The activity cage measures spontaneous coordinate activity, meaning movement in either the horizontal or vertical plane, of experimental animals within a specified amount of time. This uses a minimum of researcher time conducting functional testing to determine functional recovery of the nerve. Using microsurgical forceps, a crush injury was inflicted unilaterally, on the left side, upon the 4-month-old C3H mice creating a very high degree of pressure for 6 s upon the exposed sciatic nerve. The locomotion function of the mice was evaluated using the activity cage preoperatively, 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the surgical procedure. We found that using the activity cage functional recovery occurred by 14 days after nerve crush injury. It was also shown that, coinciding with functional recovery, immunohistochemistry changes for GD1a and nNOS appeared at the level of L4, where the sciatic nerve joins the spinal column. GD1a and nNOS have both been linked to regenerative processes in mammalian nervous systems.