Re-excision after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review and metanalysis. The rationale of systematic re-excision.

In Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS) referral centre many patients have already had an incomplete tumour resection. In the majority of specimen, tumoral residual is detected and linked to a worsen prognosis. Systematic surgical re-resection of the scar tissue area is often performed. Some authors suggested to postpone re-resections until a clinically evident local recurrence is detected. A searching strategy was applied to Pubmed-Central and Ovid Medline. Odds ratio (OR) for local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (MTS) or overall survival (OS) were calculated comparing patients who had tumour residual to people who hadn't. OR of local recurrences, distant metastasis and OS were calculated in planned vs unplanned-excisions groups. OR to develop a metastasis and OS after a local recurrences were calculated. Residual tumour led to an OR for LR of 3,56, OR of MTS was 3,42; OR of decreased OS was 3,42. Having a LR lead to a OR of 1,55 for MTS and to a OR of decreased OS of 2,32. Patients who underwent a re-excision compared to planned surgery did not have an increased OR of LR and had an OR to develop a MTS of 0,56. Our data confirm that there is a strong correlation between local recurrences, distant relapses and overall survival. Although there is a selection bias; this analysis highlights the optimal oncological outcome in patients who underwent re-resection. The rationale for systematic re-resection after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas is very strong and this treatment remains the gold standard of care in these patients.

Survival of osteosarcoma patients following diagnosis of synchronous skip metastases.

BACKGROUND: We aim to investigate the prognostic implications of synchronous skip metastases in osteosarcoma by presenting the largest single centre series to date. METHODS: Retrospective study of 21 osteosarcoma patients with skip metastases treated between 1983 and 2004. RESULTS: No statistical difference in overall survival was demonstrated when comparing presence of lung metastases to those without (p = 0.859). No statistical difference was found in overall survival according to age group (<18yrs vs >18yrs; p = 0.126), or to percentage chemotherapy-induced bone necrosis (<90% vs >90%; p = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of skip metastases confers a very poor prognosis as an independent variable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Multimodal Treatment in Pelvic Ewing Sarcoma: A Prognostic Factor Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although multidisciplinary therapies have improved local control and overall survival in Ewing sarcoma (ES), the prognosis of pelvic lesions remains markedly worse than that of limb ES. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the influence of the type of local treatment, margins, necrosis and sacrum involvement on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in a series of 21 non-metastatic pelvic ES. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 46.3 months (range 3-156). Only one patient had recurrence, at 11 months after surgery. Eight patients showed pulmonary metastasis and five showed bone metastases. Necrosis was the only significant prognostic factor for overall survival at 5 years (p=0.0132) and disease-free survival (p=0.0086). Overall survival at 5 years was 40.1%. CONCLUSION: Local control in pelvic Ewing sarcoma is comparable for patients treated with surgery (S), surgery plus radiotherapy (S/RT), or definitive radiotherapy (RT). The combination of surgery plus radiotherapy could be indicated in cases of large tumor, a poor necrosis response (< 90%), or an inadequate margin with involvement of the sacrum. A poor response to neoadjuvant therapy is a significant risk factor for both local control and overall survival.

Surgical Treatment of Sacral Chordoma: En Bloc Resection with Negative Margins is a Determinant of the Long-Term Outcome.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To report the outcome of a series of patients with sacral chordoma who were surgically treated at a single center. SUMMARY: Chordomas are low-grade malignant tumors that arise from remnants of the notochord. They are most often found in the sacrum, spine and skull-base. These tumors have a slow clinical evolution and may eventually metastasize, even after adequate treatment. Rarely, they can dedifferentiate into high-grade sarcomas. Traditionally, chordomas were considered to be resistant to chemotherapy and standard radiation therapy. However, recently, adrotherapy has been shown to be effective for local and systemic control of the disease. In this study, clinical outcomes and local and systemic recurrence were reviewed to identify prognostic factors for local and systemic control. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with sacral chordoma (19 males, 14 females; median age 61 y, range 43-80) who were surgically treated at our institution between 1994 and 2015 were reviewed. In 24 patients, resection was performed above S2. No patients received pre-operative radiotherapy (RT). Three cases received RT (carbon ion therapy) as treatment for local recurrence. Wide (R0) surgical margins were achieved in 17 patients, marginal (R1) margins in 14 patients and intralesional (R2) margins in 2 patients. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 53 months (range 0-198), 19 patients were continuously disease-free, 6 were disease-free after local recurrence (5) or metastases (1), 3 were alive with disease (2 local recurrence and 1 metastasis), 4 were dead of disease (1 patient died intraoperatively) and 1 was dead of another cause. Local recurrence was observed in 9 cases (27%); all 9 were treated surgically and 3 received carbon ion therapy after surgical intralesional excision. Overall survival at 10 years was 86.6%. Local recurrence-free survival at 10 years was 51%. A statistical analysis confirmed the importance of negative surgical margins (R0) to achieve local control of the disease (p = 0.0007). High resections (above S2) were associated with lower survival and higher risk of local recurrence. CONCLUSION: Surgical en bloc resection is the primary treatment for sacral chordoma. Carbon ion therapy is used when it is difficult to obtain wide surgical margins. Due to morbidity and the disabling sequelae of surgery, adrotherapy may be considered an alternative to high (above S2-S3) sacral chordoma resections.

Allograft Reconstruction of the Extensor Mechanism after Resection of Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue tumors around the knee joint still pose problems for the excision and subsequent reconstruction. METHODS: In the 6 included patients the soft tissue sarcoma has its base on the anterior surface of the extensor mechanism and expands towards the skin. The entire extensor apparatus (quadriceps tendon, patella, and patellar tendon) was resected and replaced by a fresh-frozen allograft. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 6.7 years (range: 2-12.4 years). In two patients a local recurrence occurred, resulting in a 5-year local recurrence-free rate of 66.7% (95% CI: 19.5%-90.4%). Distant metastases were found in 4 patients resulting in a 5-year metastasis-free rate of 33.3% (95% CI: 4.6%-67.5%). Two patients underwent at least one revision surgery, including one patient in whom the allograft had to be removed. According to the ISOLS function score 24.7 points (range: 19-28 points) were achieved at the last follow-up. The mean active flexion of the knee joint was 82.5° (range: 25-120°) and a mean extension lag of 10° (range: 0-30°) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The replacement of the extensor mechanism by an allograft is a reasonable option, allowing wide margins and restoration of active extension in most patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The presented study is listed on the ISRCTN registry with trial number ISRCTN63060594.

Biological Intercalary Reconstruction with Bone Grafts After Joint-Sparing Resection of the Lower Limb: Is this an Effective and Durable Solution for Joint Preservation?

Due to advances in neoadjuvant therapies and preoperative imaging modalities, joint-sparing resections have become appealing in bone tumor surgery. However, the intercalary reconstruction of metadiaphyseal bone defects of the femur and the tibia after juxta-articular tumor resection remains challenging. Both biological and prosthetic reconstructions have been used for joint-sparing resections, but little is known about the long-term outcome of these procedures. The authors reviewed a consecutive series of 64 patients treated with joint-sparing intercalary resection and reconstruction with bone grafts. Inclusion criteria were an osteotomy line within 5 cm from the knee and ankle joint surface and an osteotomy line proximal to 1 cm below the lesser trochanter at the hip level. Intra-epiphyseal resection was performed in 25 patients (39%)and intercalary resection was performed in 39 (61%). Reconstruction included 49 allograft + vascularized fibular graft (VFG), 10 allografts, and 5 VFG + structural allogenic grafts. At a mean follow-up of 117 months (range 12-305), 51 patients (80%) were continuously disease-free, and 6 showed no evidence of disease after treatment of local recurrence or metastatic lesion. One patient was alive with lung metastases at 26 months of follow-up and six patients died of disease. In the entire series of 64 patients, 26 had a non-oncological complication that required surgical revision (40.6%). Overall survival (OS) of reconstruction was 92% at 5 years and 90% at 10 and 15 years. Limb salvage survival (LSS) was 94% at 5, 10 and 15 years. Twenty-two fractures occurred in 17 patients (26.5%). There were a total of nine non-unions (14%). Six patients (9.3%) presented early wound dehiscence (average 1.8 months, range 0-6). A deep infection occurred in 3 cases (4.7 %). In 12 patients treated with VGF reconstruction (12/54:22%), a donor-site complication was observed. The overall Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional score in 54 evaluable patients, who were alive with reconstruction in situ, was 27 points (range 18-30). Biologic intercalary reconstructions with bone grafts resulted in effective joint-sparing resections of the lower limb, allowing joint preservation in all but one case who required a total knee replacement for varus osteoarthritis. Despite the high rate of complications requiring surgical revision, at 15 years, overall survival of the reconstruction was 90% and limb salvage survival was 94%. In our experience, revision-free survival was better with VFG reconstruction than with allograft alone and the combination of VFG and allogenic graft seems to favor spontaneous fracture-healing and to decrease the non-union rate.

Preoperative Denosumab With Curettage and Cryotherapy in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Is There an Increased Risk of Local Recurrence?

BACKGROUND: Denosumab is a monoclonal RANKL antibody, which was originally introduced for the treatment of osteoporosis and bone metastases from solid tumors, but more recently has been used for treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). In GCTB, denosumab has been used as a single agent in patients with inoperable tumors; it also has been used before surgery in some patients with the aim to downstage the tumor to facilitate a joint-preserving procedure (curettage) rather than a resection. However, few studies are available evaluating the benefits and risks of denosumab for the latter indication. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does preoperative treatment with denosumab reduce the risk of local recurrence in patients treated for GCTB? (2) Are there adverse effects of short-term denosumab use before surgery and, if so, what are they? METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of GCTB surgically treated at our institution from June 2009 to June 2016 with curettage and cryotherapy were retrospectively evaluated to compare patients treated with curettage alone versus patients treated with curettage after preoperative therapy with denosumab. During that period, we treated 97 patients for GCTB; 30 patients were excluded because they received a resection; 34 patients were excluded because they received curettage without cryotherapy. Of the remaining 33 patients, four were excluded because they received denosumab only after surgery, one because she received zoledronic acid, one because she received a curettage after her refusal of a resection that was the advised procedure, two because they were lost to followup early, and four because they were treated for recurrence rather than a new diagnosis of GCTB. The remaining 21 patients were included. Twelve lesions had been treated with surgery after denosumab and nine with surgery alone. During the study period, we preferentially used denosumab for the more aggressive-looking lesions. After curettage, cryotherapy of the residual bone walls was performed with argon cryoprobes to -150° C after pouring gel into the cavity, and we then used cement (17 patients) or morcellized allograft (four patients). Tumors were Campanacci Grade 3 in eight of 12 patients in the denosumab group and in two of nine patients in the surgery-only group (p = 0.08), but the extent of epiphyseal juxtaarticular bone involvement was not different between the groups with the numbers available. Median followup was 39 months (range, 14-55 months) in the denosumab group and 27 months (range, 18-92 months) in the surgery-only group. We used chart review to record the proportion of patients in each treatment group who had a local recurrence and to tally adverse events. RESULTS: With the numbers available, there was no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing a recurrence (five of 12 in the denosumab group and one of nine in the surgery-only group; p = 0.18). We found no adverse effects associated with denosumab either during or after treatment; specifically, we found no alterations in electrolyte levels, blood count, or liver and renal function parameters. In this small series, no patient has developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, use of denosumab before surgery for GCTB appeared to allow the reforming of a bone peripheral rim around the tumor, perhaps facilitating curettage rather than osteoarticular resection in some patients. However, we did not observe a decrease in the risk of local recurrence with the use of denosumab, suggesting that it may not decrease the aggressiveness of the disease; according to our preliminary results, we cannot exclude that the rate of local recurrence could be even higher after curettage in denosumab-treated patients than in nontreated patients, and until or unless larger studies demonstrate such a reduction, primary intralesional surgery without denosumab seems more prudent when curettage is feasible at presentation. We did not observe any adverse effects with denosumab, but we caution readers that this study was underpowered to detect even relatively common complications and relatively large differences in the risk of local recurrence. Future studies should evaluate denosumab prospectively; given the relative rarity of this tumor, we suspect multicenter studies are needed to achieve this. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Pre-operative diclofenac HPßCD for pain control of needle biopsy in musculoskeletal neoplasm: preliminary results.

Needle biopsy is the main standard method used for diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors of the limbs and superficial trunk. Pain control during this procedure is through the use of Local Anaestetic (L.A.). In order to achieve a complete pain control in our cases, recently we started using diclofenac HPßCD 50 mg via s.c. preoperativly. We present the clinical results of a non-randomized study of two eterogeneous groups of patients: "Experimental" Group (1): diclofenac HPßCD 50 mg via s.c. one hour before surgical procedure, local anesthesia and ev. diclofenac HPßCD 50 mg via s.c. 12 hours postoperative; "Conventional" Group (2): local anesthesia and ev. postoperative tramadol 100 mg via oral for pain control. In October 2014, at the Department of Orthopedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery of Florence, 37 musculoskeletal biopsies for a bone or a soft tissue lesion were performed. Exclusion criteria for this study were: known allergies to lidocaine, diclofenac, tramadol; known gastric or duodenal ulcers; known gastrointestinal bleed or perforation; refusal of the patients to collaborate. For one or more of these reasons, 6 patients were excluded from this study. In the Group 1, 10 patients (59%) referred no pain during the surgical procedure (8/14 biopsies on soft tissue and 2/3 on bone). In 5 cases (29%) no exacerbation of previous chronic pain, and in 2 cases (12%) a progression of local pain after biopsy (average 1 points higher in the VAS). In Group 2, only 6 patients (42%) did not have any pain during the procedure, 4 (29%) no exacerbation of previous chronic pain and 4 (29%) a progression of local pain (average 2 points higher in the VAS). Despite similar results in both Groups, Group 1 seemed to have a mild better control of perioperative pain. The use of diclofenac HPßCD 50 mg preoperative seems to be a rational approach for minimizing perioperative pain and the preliminary data of our study seem encouraging. Obviously many bias are present in this study (small numbers of cases, heterogeneity of diseases, association with local anesthetic, non-randomized study, comparison between preoperative versus postoperative treatment) and this cannot absolutely be considerate as definitive conclusions.

Scapular allograft reconstruction after total scapulectomy: surgical technique and functional results.

HYPOTHESIS: Scapular allograft reconstruction after total scapulectomy preserving the rotator cuff muscles is an oncologically safe procedure and results in good functional outcome with a low complication rate. METHODS: The data of 6 patients who underwent scapular allograft reconstruction after a total scapulectomy for tumor resection were retrospectively reviewed. At least 1 of the rotator cuff muscles was preserved and the size-matched scapular allograft fixed to the residual host acromion with a plate and screws. The periscapular muscles and the residual joint capsule were sutured to the corresponding insertions of the allograft. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 5.5 years (range, 24-175 months). In all patients, a wide surgical margin was achieved. The average functional scores were 20 points for the International Society of Limb Salvage score and 60 points for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Mean active shoulder flexion of 60° (range, 30°-90°) and mean active abduction of 62° (range, 30°-90°) were achieved. During the follow-up, 1 patient (16.6%) had a local recurrence and lung metastasis, whereas the remaining 5 patients (83.3%) were disease free. Two breakages of the osteosynthesis and 2 allograft fractures were observed, necessitating a revision surgery in 2 cases (33.3%). In this series, no infection, allograft resorption, or shoulder instability occurred. CONCLUSION: Allograft substitution of a completely removed scapula is an oncologically safe procedure, with good functional results, avoiding common complications in prosthetic replacements such as infection and dislocation of the shoulder joint.