Digital technologies for motor rehabilitation in children: protocol for a cross-sectional European survey.

INTRODUCTION: Digital technologies can be used as part of paediatric motor rehabilitation to remediate impairment, promote recovery and improve function. However, the uptake of digital technologies in this clinical field may be limited.The aim of this study is to describe and explain digital technology use for paediatric motor rehabilitation. The specific objectives will be: (1) to describe the access to, acceptance of and use of digital technologies as a function of individual factors related to professionals practicing motor rehabilitation with children, and of environmental factors related to paediatric rehabilitation practice and (2) to explain digital technology use with a causal model based on the 'unified theory of acceptance and use of technology'. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RehaTech4child (Rehabilitation Technologies For children) is a cross-sectional study involving an online survey, that is sponsored by the European Academy of Childhood Disability (EACD). The survey protocol follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and CHERRIES (Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys) guidelines. The survey includes 43 questions about (1) respondents' individual and environmental characteristics; (2) the ease of access to digital technologies, and the frequency, type and purpose of use of those technologies and (3) acceptance of technologies and barriers to their use. The survey is intended for professionals involved in paediatric motor rehabilitation. It is disseminated across Europe by the EACD network in 20 languages. Participation is anonymous and voluntary. We aim to include 500 respondents to ensure sufficient precision for the description of study outcomes and to perform stratified analyses by the main determinants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was waived by the Brest CHRU Institutional Review Board. The study is conducted according to current French legislation (loi Jardé (n°2012-300)) and the survey is GDPR compliant. Study findings will be presented at national and international meetings and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05176522.

Intermuscular coherence of plantar and dorsiflexor muscles in older adults with Parkinson's disease and age-matched controls during bipedal and unipedal stance.

Introduction: Postural instability increases with age and is exacerbated in neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD). Reducing the base of support from bipedal to unipedal stance increases center of pressure (CoP) parameters and intermuscular coherence in lower-leg muscles of healthy older adults. To further develop an understanding of postural control in an altered state of neurological impairment, we explored intermuscular coherence in lower-leg muscles and CoP displacement in older adults with PD. Methods: This study measured surface EMG from the medial (MG) and lateral (LG) gastrocnemii, soleus (SOL), and tibialis anterior (TA), and examined EMG amplitude and intermuscular coherence during bipedal and unipedal stance on a force plate with firm (no foam) and compliant (standing on foam) surface conditions in nine older adults with PD (70±5 years, 6 females) and 8 age-matched non-Parkinsonian older adults (5 females). Intermuscular coherence was analyzed between agonist-agonist and agonist-antagonist muscle pairs in the alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (15-35 Hz) frequency bands. Results: CoP parameters increased from bipedal to unipedal stance in both groups (p < 0.01), but did not increase from the firm to compliant surface condition (p > 0.05). During unipedal stance, CoP path length was shorter in older adults with PD (2027.9 ± 1074.1 mm) compared to controls (3128.5 ± 1198.7 mm) (p < 0.01). Alpha and beta agonist-agonist and agonist-antagonist coherence increased by 28% from bipedal to unipedal stance (p > 0.05), but did not differ between older adults with PD (0.09 ± 0.07) and controls (0.08 ± 0.05) (p > 0.05). The older adults with PD also had greater normalized EMG amplitude of the LG (63.5 ± 31.7%) and TA (60.6 ± 38.4%) during the balance tasks (p > 0.05) than the non-Parkinsonian counterparts. Discussion: Older adults with PD had shorter path lengths during unipedal stance and required greater muscle activation than older adults without PD to perform the tasks, but intermuscular coherence did not differ between the groups. This may be attributable to their early disease stage and high motor function.

A two-stage disto-proximal braking modality to interrupt gait initiation in healthy adults.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of unexpected gait termination in able-bodied participants during gait initiation on spatiotemporal and stance limb biomechanical parameters. Twenty-one healthy adults took part in this study and were divided into two groups based on the natural anterior or posterior incline of their trunk. Each participant performed 15 random trials of gait initiation: 10 trials with a Go signal and 5 with Go-&-Stop signals. Spatiotemporal parameters were assessed between the Go signal and the first heel contact. Ankle, knee, and hip joint moments were calculated in the sagittal plane. Free moment and impulse were also calculated for the stance limb. Spatiotemporal parameters were not influenced by the mean trunk inclination (p > 0.05), but participants with a forwardly-inclined trunk presented higher hip extension moments (p < 0.05). Unexpected stopping required smaller ankle and knee moments compared to the Go condition (p < 0.05). The hip extension moments appeared to be independent of gait initiation conditions (p > 0.05). The capacity of able-bodied people to interrupt their gait initiation relied on a two-stage disto-proximal braking modality involving explosive motor patterns at the ankle and hip joints. Such a pattern could be altered in vulnerable people, and further studies are needed to investigate this. This study determined a clinical method applicable as a functional protocol to assess and improve the postural control of people suffering from a lack of motor modulation during crucial transient tasks. Such tasks are essential in activities of daily living.

Standing posture and balance modalities in unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputees.

INTRODUCTION: Lower limb amputation impairs postural performance that could be characterized by biomechanical parameters. This study is to investigate postural performance of persons with transfemoral and transtibial amputation compared to controls without amputation. METHODS: Eight transtibial, nine transfemoral and twelve able-bodied males participated in this study. Lower limb joints, pelvis and trunk angles were obtained from an optoelectronic motion analysis system to evaluate body posture parameters. The mean, range and speed of the center of pressure (CoP) in both antero-posterior and medio-lateral axes as well as the ellipse area covered by 90% of CoP and free moment were calculated using a single force-plate. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Differences in body posture were only noted between the non-amputee and the transtibial groups. Transtibial amputees leaned more forwardly their trunk by 3.5° compared to able-bodied (p = 0.028). The mean CoP position in transfemoral amputees was closer to the non-amputated side than transtibial amputees (p = 0.034) and as compared to the dominant side in non-amputees (p = 0.042). Factor analysis revealed three postural performance modalities. Non-amputees postural performance was characterized solely by body posture parameters. Transfemoral amputees exclusively favored a modality associated with standing balance parameters, whereas transtibial amputees exhibited a mixed modality comprising a combination of postural and balance parameters. CONCLUSION: These findings support that the level of amputation is characterized by postural performance modalities different from non-amputees. Clinicians could apply this knowledge as part of their routine rehabilitation program to enhance postural and standing balance assessments in unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputees.

Contribution of Achilles tendon mechanical properties to torque steadiness in persons with transfemoral amputation.

BACKGROUND: How Achilles tendon mechanics and plantar flexion strength and torque steadiness are altered in the intact leg of persons with trauma-related amputation is unknown. Understanding Achilles tendon mechanics following amputation will further inform rehabilitation approaches to enhance posture, balance, and force control. OBJECTIVE: Conduct a pilot study to quantify plantar flexion maximal voluntary contraction torque, torque steadiness, and Achilles tendon mechanics in persons with unilateral trauma-related transfemoral amputation and controls without amputation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Isometric plantar flexion maximal voluntary contractions were performed with the intact leg of ten males with transfemoral amputation (48 ± 14 years) and the dominant leg of age-matched male controls without amputation. Torque steadiness was calculated as the coefficient of variation in torque over 6 s during submaximal tracking tasks (5%, 10%, 25%, 50%, and 75% maximal voluntary contraction). Achilles tendon elongation and cross-sectional area were recorded with ultrasound to calculate strain, stress, and stiffness. RESULTS: Maximal voluntary contraction and torque steadiness did not differ between persons with amputation (90.6 ± 31.6 N m, 3.7 ± 2.0%) and controls (95.8 ± 26.8 N m, 2.9 ± 1.2%; p > 0.05). Tendon stiffness (21.1 ± 18.2 N/mm) and strain (5.2 ± 1.3%) did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). Tendon cross-sectional area was 10% greater in persons with amputation leading to 29% lower stress (p = 0.021). Maximal voluntary contraction was a predictor of a lower coefficient of variation in torque (R2 = 0.11, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Persons with trauma-related transfemoral amputation do not differ in plantar flexion maximal voluntary contraction and torque steadiness of the intact leg compared with controls without amputation. Larger tendon cross-sectional area reduces stress and enables distribution of force across a greater area.

Does Unilateral Lower Limb Amputation Influence Ankle Joint Torque in the Intact Leg?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate ankle torque and steadiness in the intact leg of transtibial and transfemoral unilateral amputees. DESIGN: Comparative study. SETTING: Medical rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen persons with a unilateral transfemoral amputation, 8 persons with a transtibial amputation, and 14 able-bodied male participants volunteered to participate in this study (N=37). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Maximal isometric torque performed during ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion in the intact limb of amputees and in the dominant limb of able-bodied persons. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the plantarflexion torque was calculated over 5 seconds during a submaximal isometric contraction (15%) in order to assess torque steadiness. Furthermore, electromyographic activity (the root mean square amplitude) of the gastrocnemius medialis and tibialis anterior muscles was analyzed. RESULTS: Plantarflexion maximal torque was significantly higher for the able-bodied group (115±39 Nm) than for the group with a transfemoral amputation (77±34 Nm) (P<.01), and did not differ between able-bodied group and the group with a transtibial amputation (97±26 Nm) (P=.25). Furthermore, the transfemoral amputee group was 29% less steady than the able-bodied group (P=.01). However, there were no significant differences in torque steadiness between the able-bodied group and transtibial amputee group (P=.26) or between transtibial and transfemoral amputee groups (P=.27). The amputation had no significant effect between groups on dorsiflexion maximal torque (P=.10), gastrocnemius medialis electromyography (EMG) (P=.85), tibialis anterior coactivation (P=.95), and coactivation ratio (P=.75). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that as the level of amputation progresses from below the knee to above the knee, the effect on the intact ankle is progressively more negative.

Differential impact of visual feedback on plantar- and dorsi-flexion maximal torque output.

The effect of visual feedback on enhancing isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) was evaluated. Twelve adults performed plantar-flexion and dorsi-flexion MVCs in 3 conditions (no visual feedback, visual feedback, and visual feedback with target). There was no significant effect of visual conditions on dorsi-flexion MVC but there was an effect on plantar-flexion. Irrespective of whether a target was evident, visual feedback increased plantar-flexion MVC by ∼15%. This study highlights the importance of optimal feedback to enhance MVC.

Bilateral Strength Deficit Is Not Neural in Origin; Rather Due to Dynamometer Mechanical Configuration.

During maximal contractions, the sum of forces exerted by homonymous muscles unilaterally is typically higher than the sum of forces exerted by the same muscles bilaterally. However, the underlying mechanism(s) of this phenomenon, which is known as the bilateral strength deficit, remain equivocal. One potential factor that has received minimal attention is the contribution of body adjustments to bilateral and unilateral force production. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the plantar-flexors in an innovative dynamometer that permitted the influence of torque from body adjustments to be adapted. Participants were identically positioned between two setup configurations where torques generated from body adjustments were included within the net ankle torque (locked-unit) or independent of the ankle (open-unit). Twenty healthy adult males performed unilateral and bilateral maximal voluntary isometric plantar-flexion contractions using the dynamometer in the open and locked-unit mechanical configurations. While there was a significant bilateral strength deficit in the locked-unit (p = 0.01), it was not evident in the open-unit (p = 0.07). In the locked-unit, unilateral torque was greater than in the open-unit (p<0.001) and this was due to an additional torque from the body since the electromyographic activity of the agonist muscles did not differ between the two setups (p>0.05). This study revealed that the mechanical configuration of the dynamometer and then the body adjustments caused the observation of a bilateral strength deficit.