Knee tuberculosis: A misleading clinical entity (case report).

INTRODUCTION: Bone and joint infections are rare localizations of tuberculosis, and its diagnosis is challenging. The atypical clinical presentation may lead to delayed diagnosis and severe complications. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 72-year-old female diagnosed with tuberculosis of the knee. She was complaining of progressive right knee pain and swelling without systemic signs. She was misdiagnosed as having a flare-up of osteoarthritis, which led to a delayed diagnosis and a septic subluxation of the knee. We performed a knee arthrotomy, lavage, and stabilization with an external fixator. The microbiologic tests did not isolate any germs. However, a histological examination confirmed the diagnosis by revealing a caseating granuloma surrounded by epithelioid cells. The patient treated with anti-tuberculosis therapy had a good evolution. Three months post-surgery, the external fixator was replaced with a removable knee brace. DISCUSSION: Osteoarticular tuberculosis is often caused by the hematogenous route. The lack of specificity in clinical and radiological signs makes the diagnosis difficult, especially at the early stage, leading to delays in diagnosis and complications. Nevertheless, the recognition of predisposing factors to tuberculosis, with persisting symptoms despite treatment, should draw the intention of further investigation. The treatment of osteoarticular tuberculosis is primary medical with antituberculosis chemotherapy. However, surgical treatment is reserved for specific indications and mostly to treat complications. CONCLUSION: The lack of specificity in clinical and radiological signs in osteoarticular tuberculosis may mislead the physician. Nevertheless, focusing on predisposing factors, especially in endemic areas, may guide diagnosis and avoid complications.

Impact of acetazolamide use in severe exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.

PURPOSE: To analyse the impact of acetazolamide (ACET) use in severe acute decompensation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective pair-wise, case-control study with 1:1 matching. Patients were defined as cases when they had received acetazolamide (500 mg per day) and as controls when they did not received it. Patients were matched according to age, severity on admission (pH, PaO2/FiO2 ratio) and SAPSII score. Our primary endpoint was the effect of ACET (500 mg per day) on the duration of mechanical ventilation. Our secondary endpoints were the effect of ACET on arterial blood gas parameters, ICU length of stay (LOS) and ICU mortality. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included and equally distributed between the two studied groups. There were 66 males (92%). The mean age (± SD) was 69.7 ± 7.4 years ranging from 53 to 81 years. There were no differences between baseline characteristics of the two groups. Concomitant drugs used were also not significantly different between two groups. Mean duration of mechanical ventilation was not significantly different between ACET(+) and ACET(-) patients (10.6±7.8 days and 9.6±7.6 days, respectively; P = 0.61). Cases had a significantly decreased serum bicarbonate, arterial blood pH, and PaCO2 levels. We did not found any significant difference between the two studied groups in terms of ICU LOS. ICU mortality was also comparable between ACET(+) and ACET(-) groups (38% and 52%, respectively; P = 0.23). CONCLUSION: Although our study some limitations, it suggests that the use of insufficient acetazolamide dosage (500 mg/d) ACET (500 mg per day) has no significant effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill COPD patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Our results should be confirmed or infirmed by further studies.

Incidence and impact outcome of pulmonary embolism in critically ill patients with severe exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases.

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the incidence and the prognostic impact [mortality and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (LOS)] of pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: This is a retrospective study performed during a 5-year period in the ICU of Habib Bourguiba University Hospital (Sfax, Tunisia). All patients with severe acute exacerbation of COPD were included. The diagnosis of PE is confirmed by spiral computed tomography scan showing one or more filling defects or obstruction in the pulmonary artery or its branches. RESULTS: During the study period, 131 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD were admitted in our ICU. The mean age (±standard deviation) was 68.6 ± 9.2 years, ranging from 39 to 99 years (median: 70 years). During their ICU stay, 23 patients (17.5%) developed PE. The diagnosis was confirmed within 48 h from ICU admission in all cases but one. The comparison between the two groups (with and without PE) showed that they had the same baseline characteristics. However, all PE group developed shock on ICU admission or during ICU stay. Signs of right heart failure were more observed in the PE group. ICU mortality was significantly higher in the PE group (69.5% vs 44%; P = 0.029). In addition, the ICU LOS was significantly higher in the PE group than the PE-free group (P = 0.007). Finally, PE was identified as an independent factor predicting poor outcome [odds ratio = 3.49, 95% CI (1.01-11.1); P = 0.035]. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that PE is common in patients with severe COPD exacerbation requiring ICU admission. Moreover, PE was significantly associated with higher mortality and ICU LOS in critically ill patients with severe COPD exacerbation.

Does change of catecholamine use improve the outcome of patients with shock admitted to intensive care unit?

Up to 2008, dopamine was the catecholamine that was the most recommended in our intensive care unit (ICU) after fluid resuscitation. However, recently, norepinephrine has become the catecholamine that was most recommended in our ICU after fluid resuscitation. The aim of this study was to determine if there was an efficacy or safety benefit to this protocol therapeutic change in patients with shock admitted to our ICU. The primary outcome variable was ICU mortality. This is a prospective observational study conducted in 2 periods in our ICU (Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia). During the 2 study periods, 251 patients were included. There were 130 patients in group 1 and 121 patients in group 2. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to most of the baseline characteristics. The comparison between the 2 groups showed that in the first period, dopamine was the catecholamine that was the most used. However, in the second period, norepinephrine is the catecholamine that was most used. When we analyzed the catecholamine prescription in septic shock, we concluded that in the first study period, dopamine was used as the catecholamine as the first choice in 85.7% of cases (P < 0.001), and norepinephrine is the first choice in 100% of cases in the second period. In cardiogenic shock, in the first study period, dobutamine was used as the catecholamine as the first choice in 61% of cases (P < 0.001) and norepinephrine is the first choice in 43% of cases in the second period. Finally, in hypovolemic shock, dopamine was used as the catecholamine as the first choice in 68% of cases in group 1 and norepinephrine is the first choice in 88% of cases in the second period (P < 0.001). During the ICU stay, some adverse events related to catecholamine use were observed. The occurrence of arrhythmias was significantly more frequent in the first group. Mortality rate was at 51% in the first group and 44% in the second group (P = 0.27). The mortality rate was not significantly different for each type of shock (septic, cardiogenic, and hypovolemic) in both groups (P > 0.05 for all), although the occurrence of arrhythmias was significantly more frequent in the first group, in clinical practice, our study confirms that the rate of death did not differ significantly between the 2 groups of patients mostly treated with dopamine (group 1) and the group mostly treated with norepinephrine.

Midventricular Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy during Pregnancy Complicated by Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Report.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with midventricular obstruction (MVO) is a rare condition occurring in 1% of HCM patients. It is characterized by asymmetric left ventricular hypertrophy with MVO and elevated intraventricular pressure gradients. Pulmonary embolism has been associated with mid-ventricular obstructive HCM. Briefly, this case presents an unusual clinical scenario where a young pregnant woman suffering from hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy presents with dyspnea hemodynamic compromise related to pulmonary embolism illustrating hemodynamic challenges created by pregnancy and surgery. We concluded that simple measures such as communication between the cardiology and obstetric teams, understanding of the hemodynamic changes, anesthetic planning, and monitoring were paramount for the success in our patient.

Intracardiac thrombus in a young man: don't forget Behçet's disease!

Intracardiac thrombosis is an exceptional complication of Behçet's disease. The management of this involvement is difficult due to the risk of recurrence. We present the case of a young man admitted to our hospital for intermittent fever. The microbiologic investigations did not show any causative germ. We discovered a right ventricle thrombus on echocardiography. We confirmed the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism on CT angiogram. The patient developed oral and genital ulcerations which were consistent with Behçet's syndrome. The thrombus had disappeared after treatment with anticoagulant, corticosteroid and immunosuppressors. Intracardiac thrombosis can reveal Behçet's disease. An exhaustive examination and close monitoring should be performed in order to reveal pathognomonic signs as soon as possible and to promptly start the appropriate treatment.