Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 30(16): 1941-8, 2012 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22529257

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Concomitant radiochemotherapy (RCT) is the standard for locally advanced anal canal carcinoma (LAACC). Questions regarding the role of induction chemotherapy (ICT) and a higher radiation dose in LAACC are pending. Our trial was designed to determine whether dose escalation of the radiation boost or two cycles of ICT before concomitant RCT lead to an improvement in colostomy-free survival (CFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with tumors ≥ 40 mm, or < 40 mm and N1-3M0 were randomly assigned to one of four treatment arms: (A) two ICT cycles (fluorouracil 800 mg/m(2)/d intravenous [IV] infusion, days 1 through 4 and 29 to 32; and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) IV, on days 1 and 29), RCT (45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, fluorouracil and cisplatin during weeks 1 and 5), and standard-dose boost (SD; 15 Gy); (B) two ICT cycles, RCT, and high-dose boost (HD; 20-25 Gy); (C): RCT and SD boost (reference arm); and (D) RCT and HD boost. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-three of 307 patients achieved full treatment. With a median follow-up period of 50 months, the 5-year CFS rates were 69.6%, 82.4%, 77.1%, and 72.7% in arms A, B, C, and D, respectively. Considering the 2 × 2 factorial analysis, the 5-year CFS was 76.5% versus 75.0% (P = .37) in groups A and B versus C and D, respectively (ICT effect), and 73.7% versus 77.8% in groups A and C versus B and D, respectively (RT-dose effect; P = .067). CONCLUSION: Using CFS as our main end point, we did not find an advantage for either ICT or HD radiation boost in LAACC. Nevertheless, the results of the most treatment-intense arm B should prompt the design of further intensification studies.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Anus Neoplasms/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Adult , Aged , Anal Canal , Anus Neoplasms/drug therapy , Anus Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy Dosage
3.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 9: 70, 2011 Aug 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21859485

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the responsiveness of the European Organization for Research and Treatment (EORTC) quality of life questionnaires (QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR38) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-colorectal version 4 questionnaire (FACT-C). METHOD: This prospective study included 127 patients with colorectal cancer: 71 undergoing chemotherapy and 56 radiation therapy. Responsiveness statistics included the Standardized Response Mean (SRM) and the Effect Size (ES). The patient's overall assessment of his/her change in state of health status was the reference criterion to evaluate the responsiveness of the QoL questionnaires. RESULTS: 34 patients perceived their health as stable and 17 as improved between the first and the fourth courses of chemotherapy. 21 patients perceived their health as stable and 22 as improved between before and the last week of radiotherapy.The responsiveness of the 3 questionnaires differed according to treatments. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was more responsive in patients receiving chemotherapy, particulary functional scales (SRM > 0.55). The QLQ-CR38 and the FACT-C questionnaires provided little clinically relevant information during chemotherapy or radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire appears to be more responsive in patients receiving chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Sickness Impact Profile , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Radiother Oncol ; 87(3): 391-7, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18191265

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the quality of life (QOL) of patients treated by concomitant chemo radiation for locally advanced anal canal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report on a subgroup of 119 patients enrolled in a 306-patient therapeutic intensification prospective trial (ACCORD 03). This trial evaluated the impact on colostomy-free survival of induction chemotherapy and/or high dose radiotherapy (factorial design 2 *2 treatment arms). QOL was assessed both before and 2 months after treatment using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire as well as a questionnaire relating to anal sphincter conservative treatment (AS-CT). RESULTS: Compared to pre-treatment scores, patients reported significant improvement in their emotional function (+8.4 points p=0.002), global health status (+5.9 points p=0.0007), as well as a decrease in insomnia (-13.8 points p<0.0001), constipation (-12.0 points p<0.0001), appetite loss (-10.3 points p<0.0001) and pain (-9.6 points p=0.0002). The AS-CT degree of satisfaction with intestinal functions score was increased (+11.2 points p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective study comparing QOL of patients with advanced anal canal carcinoma, before and 2 months after conservative treatment. Two months after treatment, QOL was improved. Induction chemotherapy and/or high dose radiotherapy did not provide a negative impact on QOL.


Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms/drug therapy , Anus Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Anus Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Pelvis/radiation effects , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 64(4): 1013-7, 2006 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16343803

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine the dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) required for solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) in the head and neck (HN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventeen patients (15 Stage I and 2 Stage II) were treated for HN EMP at our institution between 1979 and 2003. The mean International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) dose prescribed to the CTV was 52.6 Gy (range, 40-65 Gy) over 24 fractions (range: 20-30). The Stage II patients received neck irradiation doses of 40 and 60 Gy. A mean dose of 36.4 Gy was used for 5 Stage I patients who received elective neck irradiation. Dose administrated to the CTV was evaluated from dosimetric data or from planning films when dosimetric data were not available. Two groups of patients were distinguished: CTV covered with a dose greater than 40 Gy and CTV covered with a dose greater than 45 Gy. RESULTS: The 5-year local control was 72.8%. It was 100% for patients who received dose to the CTV > or = [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] 45 Gy vs. 50% for dose to the CTV <45 Gy (p = 0.034). The prognostic factor for 5-year disease-specific survival (81.6%) was local control (p = 0.058). The prognostic factors for disease-free survival (64.1%) were monoclonal immunoglobulin secretion (p = 0.008) and a CTV dose > or = 45 Gy (p = 0.056) CONCLUSIONS: Local control of EMP in the HN seems to be improved when the dose to the CTV is > or = [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] 45 Gy. A minimum dose of 45 Gy should be recommended to the CTV.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Plasmacytoma/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Plasmacytoma/mortality , Plasmacytoma/pathology , Radiotherapy Dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...