Eficacia de las medidas de minimización de riesgos del ácido valproico: estudio de utilización del fármaco en Europa, análisis de datos de España / Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: a drug utilisation study in Europe, analysis of data from Spain

Introducción: En 2015 se aplicaron en España distintas medidas para la minimización de los riesgos (MMR) del ácido valproico. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la eficacia de las MMR del ácido valproico en España, con el fin de reducir el uso de ácido valproico como terapia de primera línea y evaluar los patrones de prescripción de ácido valproico en las mujeres, incluidas las mujeres en edad fértil (MEF), en los períodos previos y posteriores a la implementación de las MMR. Materiales y métodos: Los patrones de prescripción del ácido valproico en mujeres y MEF antes y después de la implementación de las MMR se examinaron utilizando la base de datos longitudinales de pacientes (longitudinal patient data, LPD por sus siglas en inglés), que incluye información de pacientes de dos paneles: médicos de atención primaria (MAP) y neurólogos/psiquiatras. El criterio principal de valoración fue la proporción de prescripciones iniciales de ácido valproico con al menos un medicamento relacionado con indicaciones de ácido valproico antes de la fecha de inicio del ácido valproico. Resultados: La proporción de prescripciones de ácido valproico secundarias con uso previo de medicamentos relacionados con indicaciones de ácido valproico fue del 78% –intervalo de confianza (IC) al 95%: 73,9-81,5%– y del 78,2% (IC al 95%: 74,5-81,4%) en los períodos principales previo y posterior a la implementación en el panel de MAP. Las cifras correspondientes a MEF fueron del 79,6% (IC al 95%: 73,6-84,5%) y del 75,5% (IC al 95%: 69,7-80,6%), respectivamente. La tasa de incidencia de embarazos expuestos al ácido valproico (por 1.000 personas-años) en MEF disminuyó de 17,4 en el período completo previo a la implementación a 8,5 en el período completo posterior a la implementación...(AU)

Introduction: Risk minimisation measures for valproate were implemented in Spain in 2015.Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of valproate risk minimisation measures in Spain intended to decrease the use of valproate as a first-line therapy, and to evaluate the prescribing patterns of valproate in women, including women of childbearing potential, in the pre- and post-implementation risk minimisation measures periods. Materials and methods: The prescribing patterns of valproate in females and women of childbearing potential before and after risk minimisation measures implementation were examined using the longitudinal patient data database, which includes patient information from two panels: primary care physicians and neurologists/psychiatrists. Primary endpoint was the proportion of initial valproate prescriptions with at least one medication related to the valproate indications before the valproate initiation date. Results: The proportion of incident valproate prescriptions with previous use of medication related to valproate indications was 78.0% (95% CI, 73.9%; 81.5%), and 78.2% (74.5%; 81.4%) in the main pre-and post-implementation periods in the primary care physician panel. The corresponding figures for women of childbearing potential were 79.6% (73.6%; 84.5%) and 75.5% (69.7%; 80.6%), respectively. The incidence rate of pregnancies exposed to valproate (per 1,000 person-years) in women of childbearing potential decreased from 17.4 the entire pre-implementation to 8.5 in the entire post-implementation periods. Conclusion: After the implementation of risk minimisation measures for valproate in Spain, no meaningful change in prescribing was observed regarding the proportion of valproate initiations preceded by prior medication related to valproate indications. The preventative measures recommended for use of valproate in women of childbearing potential should be considered.(AU)

Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: a drug utilisation study in Europe, analysis of data from Spain. / Eficacia de las medidas de minimización de riesgos del ácido valproico: estudio de utilización del fármaco en Europa, análisis de datos de España.

INTRODUCTION: Risk minimisation measures for valproate were implemented in Spain in 2015. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of valproate risk minimisation measures in Spain intended to decrease the use of valproate as a first-line therapy, and to evaluate the prescribing patterns of valproate in women, including women of childbearing potential, in the pre- and post-implementation risk minimisation measures periods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prescribing patterns of valproate in females and women of childbearing potential before and after risk minimisation measures implementation were examined using the longitudinal patient data database, which includes patient information from two panels: primary care physicians and neurologists/psychiatrists. Primary endpoint was the proportion of initial valproate prescriptions with at least one medication related to the valproate indications before the valproate initiation date. RESULTS: The proportion of incident valproate prescriptions with previous use of medication related to valproate indications was 78.0% (95% CI, 73.9%; 81.5%), and 78.2% (74.5%; 81.4%) in the main pre-and post-implementation periods in the primary care physician panel. The corresponding figures for women of childbearing potential were 79.6% (73.6%; 84.5%) and 75.5% (69.7%; 80.6%), respectively. The incidence rate of pregnancies exposed to valproate (per 1,000 person-years) in women of childbearing potential decreased from 17.4 the entire pre-implementation to 8.5 in the entire post-implementation periods. CONCLUSION: After the implementation of risk minimisation measures for valproate in Spain, no meaningful change in prescribing was observed regarding the proportion of valproate initiations preceded by prior medication related to valproate indications. The preventative measures recommended for use of valproate in women of childbearing potential should be considered.

TITLE: Eficacia de las medidas de minimización de riesgos del ácido valproico: estudio de utilización del fármaco en Europa, análisis de datos de España.Introducción. En 2015 se aplicaron en España distintas medidas para la minimización de los riesgos (MMR) del ácido valproico. Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la eficacia de las MMR del ácido valproico en España, con el fin de reducir el uso de ácido valproico como terapia de primera línea y evaluar los patrones de prescripción de ácido valproico en las mujeres, incluidas las mujeres en edad fértil (MEF), en los períodos previos y posteriores a la implementación de las MMR. Materiales y métodos. Los patrones de prescripción del ácido valproico en mujeres y MEF antes y después de la implementación de las MMR se examinaron utilizando la base de datos longitudinales de pacientes (longitudinal patient data, LPD por sus siglas en inglés), que incluye información de pacientes de dos paneles: médicos de atención primaria (MAP) y neurólogos/psiquiatras. El criterio principal de valoración fue la proporción de prescripciones iniciales de ácido valproico con al menos un medicamento relacionado con indicaciones de ácido valproico antes de la fecha de inicio del ácido valproico. Resultados. La proporción de prescripciones de ácido valproico secundarias con uso previo de medicamentos relacionados con indicaciones de ácido valproico fue del 78% ­intervalo de confianza (IC) al 95%: 73,9-81,5%­ y del 78,2% (IC al 95%: 74,5-81,4%) en los períodos principales previo y posterior a la implementación en el panel de MAP. Las cifras correspondientes a MEF fueron del 79,6% (IC al 95%: 73,6-84,5%) y del 75,5% (IC al 95%: 69,7-80,6%), respectivamente. La tasa de incidencia de embarazos expuestos al ácido valproico (por 1.000 personas-años) en MEF disminuyó de 17,4 en el período completo previo a la implementación a 8,5 en el período completo posterior a la implementación. Conclusión. Tras la implementación de las MMR del ácido valproico en España no se observó ningún cambio significativo en las prescripciones respecto a la proporción de iniciaciones de ácido valproico precedidas por medicación previa relacionada con indicaciones de ácido valproico. Se deben tener en cuenta las medidas preventivas recomendadas para el uso de ácido valproico en MEF.

Costs of perennial allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma increase with severity and poor disease control.

BACKGROUND: Perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) represents a global and public health problem, due to its prevalence, morbidity, and impact on the quality of life. PAR is frequently associated with allergic asthma (AA). Costs of PAR with or without AA are poorly documented. OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to detail medical resource utilization (MRU) and related direct cost for PAR, with or without concomitant AA, in France. METHODS: Using Electronic Health Records (EHRs), we identified in 2010 two cohorts of PAR patients, based on General Practitioners' diagnoses and prescribing data, with and without concomitant AA. For each patient, the EHRs were linked to corresponding claims data with MRU and costs during years 2011 to 2013. Predefined subgroup analyses were performed according to severity of PAR and level of AA control. RESULTS: The median annual cost reimbursed by social security system for a patient with PAR, and no AA was 159€ in 2013. This varied from 111€ to 188€ depending on PAR severity. For patients with PAR and concomitant AA, the median annual cost varied between 266€ and 375€, and drug treatment accounted for 42-55% of the costs, depending on asthma control. CONCLUSION: This study linking diagnoses from EHRs to claims data collected valid information on PAR management, with or without concomitant AA, and on related costs. There was a clear increase in costs with severity of PAR and control of AA.

Prescription of compression stockings in France in primary care.

OBJECTIVES: Recent French data describing real-life compression stocking use are lacking. This study aimed to describe the actual situation for patients who were prescribed compression stockings by their general practitioner and to assess annual treatment costs from a societal perspective. METHODS: A retrospective analysis using Disease Analyzer database data from 6349 adults with at least one compression stocking prescription between July 2009 and June 2010. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 58 years, and 72.3% of patients were women. Seven out of 10 patients received only a single compression stocking prescription over one year. The estimated mean annual per patient cost was 152.2 ± 100.7 Euros. CONCLUSION: Most patients received only a single compression stocking prescription during one year. General practitioners prescribing compression stockings more often may have a better understanding of venous disease and may manage their patients differently. Although more expensive, this approach may be one which should be accepted more widely.

Glucose lowering therapeutic strategies for type 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease in primary care setting in france: a cross-sectional study.

Aim. To understand glucose lowering therapeutic strategies of French general practitioners (GPs) in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods. A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted from March to June 2011 among a sample of French GPs who contribute to the IMS Lifelink Disease Analyzer database. Eligible patients were those with T2DM and moderate-to-severe CKD who visited their GPs at least once during the study period. Data were collected through electronic medical records and an additional questionnaire. Results. 116 GPs included 297 patients: 86 with stage 3a (Group 1, GFR = 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and 211 with stages 3b, 4, or 5 (Group 2, GFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Patients' mean age was approximately 75 years. Insulin was used in 19% of patients, and was predominant in those with severe CKD. More than two-thirds of patients were treated with glucose lowering agents which were either contraindicated or not recommended for CKD. Conclusion Physicians most commonly considered the severity of diabetes and not CKD in their therapeutic decision making, exposing patients to potential iatrogenic risks. The recent patient oriented approach and individualization of glycemic objectives according to patient profile rather than standard HbA1c would improve this situation.