ABSTRACT
Placebo fascinates and mystifies. Even with today's medical science we still do not know how and if it works. The use of placebo both in therapy and in research evokes ethical problems that are not easily resolved either. Placebo is intrinsically linked to deception, while veracity is a basic tenet in today's thinking of a doctor-patient relationship. In research ethics placebo, though considered the golden control condition, leads to the question of the therapeutic obligation. This narrative review presents an overview of these ethical questions and offers considerations that are of relevance to daily medical and research practice both in psychiatry and elsewhere.
Subject(s)
Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics , Pharmacology, Clinical/ethics , Placebos , Psychopharmacology/ethics , Humans , Informed Consent/psychology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Pharmacology, Clinical/methods , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Psychopharmacology/methods , Trust/psychology , Withholding Treatment/ethicsABSTRACT
Research into the role of family members in the decision making process concerning medical treatment of incompetent patients in nursing home care, shows that the involvement of a proxy decision maker implies a greater responsibility of the physician. It is the duty of the proxy decision-maker (mostly a family member) to look after the incompetent patient's interests. But it is the physician's duty to decide whether the proxy decision maker indeed fulfills this task. Even so, the physician has the professional responsibility to decide on the medical course of action. Involvement of others (relations and other health care professionals) is of great importance to the answer to the question 'What is good for this patient?' but does not absolve the physician from the obligation to decide professionally what is the right thing to do.
