The science and ethics of cell-based therapies for Parkinson's disease.

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is an age-related, disabling neurodegenerative disorder. Although sufferers usually respond to dopamine agonists for extended periods, the disease remains progressive and adverse drug effects can compromise effective long term treatment. Cell-based therapies have been the subject of much hype and optimism with regard to PD. Proof of principle was provided in the 1980s with fetal tissue transplantation trials demonstrating successful graft survival. Embryonic stem cells and reprogrammed or transdifferentiated somatic cells may provide alternative sources of tissue with the potential to overcome the material shortages and technical difficulties that have hindered fetal neural transplants. This article will review the state of the science for cell based therapies and examine the ethical issues that societies must negotiate regarding their clinical use.

Navigating the quagmire: the regulation of human embryonic stem cell research.

Embryonic stem (ES) cell research has garnered almost unprecedented attention. Debate over the boundaries of such research is ongoing, and the regulation of the field varies widely between countries. This article identifies and evaluates the four major positions that emanate from current international regulations. ES cell policies may ultimately impact on public health, and hence they must be both rigorous and transparent. We contend that these goals will only be achieved if policy is both ethically consistent and clinically realistic with regard to the ability to achieve therapeutic goals. We conclude that policies allowing the ongoing extraction of stem cells from spare in vitro fertilization embryos and the creation of embryos for research (within set limitations) cope most adequately with the tension between varying views on the moral status of the human embryo and the therapeutic potential inherent within ES cell research.

Stem cells, embryos, and the environment: a context for both science and ethics.

Debate on the potential and uses of human stem cells tends to be conducted by two constituencies-ethicists and scientists. On many occasions there is little communication between the two, with the result that ethical debate is not informed as well as it might be by scientific insights. The aim of this paper is to highlight those scientific insights that may be of relevance for ethical debate. Environmental factors play a significant role in identifying stem cells and their various subtypes. Research related to the role of the microenvironment has led to emphasis upon "plasticity", which denotes the ability of one type of stem cell to undergo a transition to cells from other lineages. This could increase the value given to adult stem cells, in comparison with embryonic stem cell research. Any such conclusion should be treated with caution, however, since optimism of this order is not borne out by current research. The role of the environment is also important in distinguishing between the terms totipotency and pluripotency. We argue that blastocysts (early embryos) and embryonic stem cells are only totipotent if they can develop within an appropriate environment. In the absence of this, they are merely pluripotent. Hence, blastocysts in the laboratory are potentially totipotent, in contrast to their counterparts within the human body which are actually totipotent. This may have implications for ethical debate, suggesting as it does that arguments based on potential for life may be of limited relevance.