ABSTRACT
Objectives: This study explored collaboration models between primary care physicians (PCPs) and care managers (CMs) and assessed each model's potential in meeting the support needs of individuals with early-stage dementia. Methods: In 2022, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among the PCPs in Tokyo. The data regarding the participant and clinic characteristics and daily practices for individuals with early-stage dementia were collected. The clinical collaborative practice was classified using a latent class analysis; comparisons were made between the identified classes based on 14 items in seven domains of support. Results: Two collaborative and one stand-alone models were identified. The former varied in the professionals' roles, with one led by PCPs and the other by CMs. We named them PCP-led, CM-led, and stand-alone models, accounting for 46.4%, 32.8%, and 20.6% of the clinics, respectively. The PCP-led clinics were significantly more likely to provide support than the stand-alone ones across five domains: cognitive function, care planning, carers' support, information, and social health. The CM-led model clinics generally fell between those of the other two models. Conclusion: Different leadership styles exist in the PCP-CM collaborations in care delivery for people with early-stage dementia. This collaboration offers distinct advantages for clinics in addressing their needs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We developed a psychosocial dementia care program to help care managers and professional caregivers manage challenging behavior in home-dwelling persons with dementia in Japan. The program consists of a web-based tool for ongoing monitoring and assessment for challenging behavior, and multi-agency discussion meetings. Results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial indicate a reduction in challenging behavior through this program. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to identify a key component of the developed program that is associated with a reduction in challenging behavior. METHODS: We used consecutive data of the intervention and examined the association between challenging behavior in home-dwelling persons with dementia, professionals' competence, and the frequency of revision of action plans. Challenging behavior was assessed using the total score of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. A baseline and follow-up questionnaire was completed by care professionals using a Japanese version of the Sense of Competence in Dementia Care Staff scale. RESULTS: A total of 86 care professionals completed a 6-month intervention with 219 persons with dementia. The 86 care professionals significantly improved in their dementia care competence. Challenging behavior was significantly reduced among the 219 persons with dementia at follow-up regardless of the level of professionals' competence or the frequency of revision of action plans. Less pain was significantly related to the lower levels of challenging behavior. CONCLUSION: The ongoing multi-agency discussion meetings, with a focus on challenging behavior, may have been the key component in the psychosocial dementia care program. Pain management should be emphasized in action plans for challenging behavior.
