The interleukin-6 signal regulates orthodontic tooth movement and pain.

Orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) is accomplished by controlling the mechanical loading onto the bone around the roots of target teeth. The precise orthodontic force induces osteoclastic bone resorption on the compression side and osteoblastic bone formation on the tension side of the alveolar bone. Orthodontic intervention causes inflammation in the periodontal ligament (PDL), which manifests as acute pain. Because inflammation is deeply connected to bone remodeling, it has been indicated that the inflammation after orthodontic intervention affects both the movement of teeth and generation of pain. However, the precise mechanisms underlying the immune regulation of OTM and the related pain are not well elucidated. Here, we found from the search of a public database that the interleukin (IL)-6 family of cytokines are highly expressed in the PDL by mechanical loading. The IL-6 signal was activated in the PDL after orthodontic intervention. The signal promoted OTM by inducing osteoclastic bone resorption. IL-6 was found to increase the number of osteoclasts by suppressing apoptosis and increasing their responsiveness to macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL). Furthermore, IL-6 signal was shown to elicit orthodontic pain by inducing neuroinflammation in the trigeminal ganglion (TG). Taken together, it was demonstrated that the IL-6 signal regulates tooth movement and pain during orthodontic treatment. It was also indicated that local blockade of the IL-6 signal is a promising therapeutic option in orthodontic treatment, targeting both tooth movement and pain.

Detection of the anti-P53 antibodies in dogs with tumors.

To detect the anti-P53 antibodies of dogs with tumors, a GST-recombinant canine (rc) P53 fusion protein was expressed and purified. Immunoblot analysis was performed using this GST-rcP53 fusion protein as an antigen and serum samples from dogs suffering from tumors as primary antibodies. Out of 16 serum samples obtained from various tumor cases, four samples showed reaction with GST-rcP53. In contrast, serum from other 12 dogs with tumors, four dogs with non-neoplastic diseases and two control healthy dogs (as controls) did not show any reaction with GST-rcP53 in immunoblotting. The p53 gene mutation and the P53 protein expression were examined, using the tumor tissues to explore the relationship between the existence of the GST-rcP53 bands, gene mutations of p53 and the accumulation of P53 protein. One case, which showed a clear GST-rcP53 band, had a point mutation of the p53 cDNA and showed nuclear accumulation of P53 protein. These results suggest that the anti-P53 antibodies are also produced in tumor dogs with p53 gene mutations.