ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) occurs in children less than 3 years old, and has a very poor prognosis. AT/RT seldom occurs in adult. We have experienced four cases of AT/RT at our institute. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiological image findings of adult-onset AT/RT and to conduct a systematic review. METHODS: Image findings of four AT/RTs in our institute were retrospectively evaluated by an experienced neuroradiologist. If the images were unavailable, image findings were evaluated from the former image interpretation report. We assembled papers of adult-onset AT/RT (n = 38) and evaluated the image findings. RESULTS: AT/RT occurs in a variety of sites (spinal region, pineal region, suprasellar region, jugular foramen, and so on). High density on computed tomography (CT) was seen in 10 of 11 cases; mixed intensity in T2-weighted image was seen in 13 of 18 cases; and high intensity on diffusion-weighted image (DWI) was seen in 3 of 3 cases. Contrast enhancement was observed in all cases in which images were available. CONCLUSIONS: We have experienced four adult-onset AT/RT cases at our institute and have evaluated image findings through systematic review. The image findings of high density on CT, high intensity on DWI, with low apparent diffusion coefficient, and a heterogenous component should lead to an inclusion of AT/RT in the differential diagnosis of a tumor; these findings may be able to suggest AT/RT; however, they cannot make the diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Rhabdoid Tumor/diagnosis , Teratoma/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The trochlear nerve is so thin that it is rarely observed with MR imaging. Therefore, we used high-resolution MSDE to reliably visualize the cisternal segments of the trochlear nerve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were 10 healthy young adults (mean age, 24 years), and 20 trochlear nerves were examined. HR-MRC, BS-MRC, and HR-MSDE were performed. A neuroradiologist judged the visibility of the trochlear nerves as 1 of 4 grades ("Excellent," "Good," "Fair," and "Not") in each MR imaging sequence. The findings were then statistically analyzed with the χ(2) test. RESULTS: Of all 20 trochlear nerves, 6 with HR-MRC, 13 with BS-MRC, and 18 with HR-MSDE were judged as "Excellent." CSF flow-related artifacts and vessels in the cistern and cerebellar tentorium in HR-MRC tended to prevent the neuroradiologists from identifying the trochlear nerve. Vessels in the cistern and cerebellar tentorium in BS-MRC also tended to prevent the neuroradiologists from identifying the trochlear nerve. Compared with other sequences, HR-MSDE visualized the trochlear nerve more often. The χ(2) test revealed statistically significant differences among the 3 MR imaging sequences (P < .01). The scan time of HR-MSDE was approximately 1.5-2.2 times longer than that of the other sequences. CONCLUSIONS: HR-MSDE is able to clearly visualize the trochlear nerve and has the same or better ability to delineate the trochlear nerve compared with other MR imaging sequences, though its long scan time does not yet yield practical use.
