A Modified Direct-Smear Processing Technique Employing Two-Step Centrifugation/Fixation Is Useful for Detecting High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the usefulness of a direct-smear processing technique employing two-step centrifugation/fixation processing (TSCFP) in the cytoscreening of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). STUDY DESIGN: Using the T24 HGUC cell line, we compared the cell yield and the morphological preservation of preparations concurrently processed by direct-smear, SurePath, ThinPrep, and TSCFP techniques. A total of 287 urine cytology cases subjected to TSCFP over a period of 6 years were reviewed and reclassified according to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (PSRUC) and correlated with histology results. RESULTS: TSCFP of T24 cells demonstrated good cell yield with a recovery rate of about 70%. Diagnostic features of HGUC, such as a high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio and irregular/hyperchromatic chromatin, were better discovered in TSCFP smears than in smears prepared with the other methods. Cytological evaluation of 287 voided urine specimens revealed that the rate of unsatisfactory preparations was quite low (0.30%) and the overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for urothelial carcinoma were 0.719, 0.923, 0.973, and 0.462, respectively. CONCLUSION: TSCFP was able to provide adequate preparations for detecting HGUC in urine cytology and could be considered as a promising processing method according to the principal purpose of PSRUC.

Brush cytology of acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas with intraductal growth: a case report.

We describe a rare case of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) with intraductal growth in a 77-year-old man, which was diagnosed by endoscopic brush cytology. Preoperative imaging revealed an ill-defined mass involving the main pancreatic duct of the body, which was suspected to be an invasive ductal carcinoma. Endoscopic brush cytology showed several thick, small to large clusters of tumor cells. However, a loosely cohesive or individual cell arrangement was more prominent. Singly dispersed naked nuclei, occasionally with crush artifact, were frequently observed. The nuclear contour was smooth and chromatin was finely clumped. The cytoplasm contained many coarse D-PAS-positive granules. Histologically, the tumor expansively invaded to parenchyma and expanded to fill the pancreatic ducts. Ultrastructurally, the tumor cells were less cohesive with scarce tight junctions, and their cytoplasm contained numerous zymogen granules and filamentous inclusions. Although ACCs usually show expansive growth, the incidence of intraductal extension may be higher than previously considered. A few of the characteristic cytomorphological features described here may be useful for differential diagnosis of this tumor from malignant epithelioid neoplasms involving the large pancreatic ducts.