ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of routine preoperative cystourethroscopy on the surgical management of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive women undergoing surgery for urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse at a tertiary referral urogynecology center to determine whether the routine use of preoperative cystourethroscopy changed the surgical management. Patients with other indications for cystourethroscopy were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 283 consecutive charts were reviewed of which 235 met inclusion criteria. Five patients accounted for 6 abnormal findings on preoperative cystourethroscopic examination including 2 bladder calculi, 2 lesions suspicious for neoplasm, and 2 cases of absent unilateral ureteric efflux. In only one case (0.5%) was the surgical plan altered. CONCLUSION: The routine use of preoperative cystourethroscopy in low-risk patients being prepared for surgery for urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse is not required when no other indications for cystourethroscopy exist.
Subject(s)
Endoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Urinary Incontinence/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cystoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Preoperative PeriodABSTRACT
In the roundtable that follows, clinicians discuss a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed: van der Kooij SM, Bipat S, Hehenkemp WJK, et al. Uterine artery embolization vs surgery in the treatment of symptomatic fibroids: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:317.e1-18.
