Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir ; 11(6): 309-15, 2007 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17952474

ABSTRACT

The Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein/Campus Lübeck offers intraoperative hypnosis since 2002. Besides clinical evaluation by controlled studies, patients attitudes should be included in the judgement on such adjuvant procedure not established in general.70 patients of the department treated under combined local anaesthesia/hypnosis rated their individual postoperative patient satisfaction by standardised questionnaires. A control group of equal size and demographic/surgical features consisted of patients that were treated without hypnosis in the same interval. Results of the inquiry indicate that intraoperative hypnosis increases significantly postoperative satisfaction of oral and maxillofacial patients. Satisfaction is attributed decisively on the adjuvant procedure.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local , Hypnosis, Anesthetic/psychology , Oral Surgical Procedures/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Choice Behavior , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
J Hypertens ; 20(6): 1143-9, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12023684

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The role of the renin-angiotensin system in the regulation of sympathetic nervous activity in human hypertension was evaluated in patients with moderate primary hypertension. For that purpose, the effects of selective angiotensin II (ANG II) receptor blockade by valsartan on sympathetic outflow to the muscle vascular bed and hemodynamic parameters were examined. Results were compared with the effects of the peripherally acting calcium antagonist amlodipine. DESIGN: Eighteen hypertensive but otherwise healthy subjects were examined in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over protocol receiving either valsartan or amlodipine or placebo for 7 days in a randomized sequence. Treatment periods were separated by washout periods of 2 weeks. METHODS: At the seventh day of treatment, blood pressure, heart rate, muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), norepinephrine, renin and angiotensin were measured during resting conditions. Additionally, parameters were measured after administration of negative pressure of -15 mmHg to the lower part of the body and after a cold pressor test. RESULTS: Both antihypertensive drugs significantly decreased oscillometrically measured systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure without any difference in effect. While valsartan did not affect the heart rate at rest, amlodipine increased it significantly. Likewise, MSNA was significantly enhanced by amlodipine but not by valsartan. Only ANG II receptor blockade increased renin and angiotensin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Selective ANG II receptor blockade not only decreases blood pressure, but also shifts the baroreflex set-point for the initiation of counter-regulatory reflex responses of heart rate and blood pressure towards normal blood pressure levels. Thus, data suggest that ANG II plays a pathogenetic role in the elevation of the baroreflex set point in primary hypertensive subjects.


Subject(s)
Amlodipine/therapeutic use , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/physiopathology , Sympathetic Nervous System/physiopathology , Tetrazoles/therapeutic use , Valine/analogs & derivatives , Valine/therapeutic use , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/innervation , Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 1 , Sympathetic Nervous System/drug effects , Valsartan
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...