Effects of clopidogrel with or without aspirin on the generation of extracellular vesicles in the microcirculation and in venous blood: A randomized placebo controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a standard strategy in acute coronary heart disease; however, it confers a considerable bleeding risk. Single-antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) inhibits haemostatic system activation ex vivo to a similar extent as DAPT. Extracellular vesicles (EV) are procoagulant and contribute to haemostatic system activation. We aimed to investigate the effect of DAPT compared with SAPT on EV. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 44 healthy volunteers received DAPT (clopidogrel + aspirin) or SAPT (clopidogrel + placebo) for 7 days. Blood was obtained from a standardized microvascular injury and through venipuncture at baseline (BL) and at 2 h, 24 h, and 8 days after treatment initiation. The number, origin, and surface expression of EV were assessed using flow cytometry. Data are given as median (quartiles). Non-parametric tests were used to evaluate the short-term (BL vs 2 h) and long-term differences (2 h to 8 days), as well as the differences between treatment groups. RESULTS: There was no difference either in the short-term effects on the number (×103 mL-1) of EV in microvascular blood between DAPT [BL: 1433 (653; 3184) vs 2 h: 862 (545; 2026), p = 0.39] and SAPT [(BL: 614 (552; 1402) vs 2 h: 1079 (781; 1538), p = 0.75)] or in the long-term effects. DAPT and SAPT did not exhibit differential short-term effects on the number and proportion (36% and 27% vs 55% and 36%) of platelet-derived EV. DAPT and SAPT resulted in a significant short-term increase in phosphatidylserine expression in microvascular blood. The effects of DAPT and SAPT on EV in venous blood were similar to those in microvascular blood. CONCLUSION: DAPT and SAPT have comparable effects on the amount, origin, and surface characteristics of EV.

Risk of cancer after anticoagulation in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: an observational cohort study.

Essentials Data on long-term cancer risk are controversial in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). We assessed long-term rates and risk factors of cancer in patients with VTE. Cancer risk after anticoagulation is not higher in VTE patients than in the general population. VTE recurrence is not predictive of a future cancer diagnosis. SUMMARY: Background Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of having a subsequent cancer diagnosis. The risk is highest during the first 6 months. Reports on cancer rates thereafter are controversial. We aimed to assess long-term rates and risk factors of cancer in patients with VTE. Methods and Results We followed patients with a first unprovoked VTE after discontinuation of anticoagulation, and excluded those receiving long-term antithrombotic therapy or with major thrombophilia. The study endpoint was the occurrence of cancer. Sixty-two (5.2%) of 1188 patients developed cancer during a median follow-up of 98 months. The cumulative incidence rates of cancer were 0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-1.2%), 3.1% (95% CI 2.0-4.1%) and 9% (95% CI 6.5-11.5) after 1, 5 and 15 years; these were not significantly different from those in the matched general population (0.6%, 3.4%, and 12.2%, respectively). The corresponding standardized incidence ratios (ratio of the observed cancer cases and the number of cases based on national cancer incidence rates) of 1.1 (95% CI 0.5-2.5), 1.0 (95% CI 0.6-1.4) and 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2) did not indicate a difference in cancer incidence between our cohort and the general population. Advancing age (hazard ratio [HR] per decade 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0) and shorter duration of anticoagulation (HR per 1-month decrease 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6) were associated with an increased cancer risk, whereas VTE recurrence was not (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.66-2.07). Conclusions Asymptomatic patients with unprovoked VTE who have completed anticoagulation therapy do not have a higher cancer risk. The inverse association between the duration of anticoagulation and the incidence of cancer warrants further investigation.

Effects of P2Y12 receptor inhibition with or without aspirin on hemostatic system activation: a randomized trial in healthy subjects.

UNLABELLED: ESSENTIALS: In acute coronary syndromes, dual antiplatelet therapy inhibits platelets but confers a bleeding risk. Healthy male volunteers received clopidogrel or ticagrelor plus aspirin or clopidogrel or ticagrelor alone. The decrease in ß-thromboglobulin in shed blood was comparable after single and dual antiplatelet therapy. We hypothesize that patients with acute coronary syndromes may not require dual antiplatelet therapy. BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin is standard in acute coronary syndromes. Dual antiplatelet therapy causes more bleeding than single antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of dual and single antiplatelet therapies on hemostatic system activation. PATIENTS/METHODS: In a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 44 healthy volunteers received clopidogrel (600 mg, then 150 mg d(-1) ) and aspirin (100 mg d(-1) ) or placebo for 7 days; An additional 44 volunteers received single-dose ticagrelor (180 mg) and aspirin (300 mg) or placebo. ß-Thromboglobulin (ß-TG [IU L(-1) ]) and prothrombin fragment 1.2 (f1.2 [nmol L(-1) ]) were measured in blood obtained from bleeding time incisions. Data are given as geometric mean ratio (GMR [95% confidence interval]) to describe the differences in the first 2 h and as mean differences (Δ [95% confidence interval]) in area under the curve (AUC) to discriminate differences in effects over the total observation time. RESULTS: Clopidogrel plus aspirin and clopidogrel plus placebo reduced ß-TG by a GMR of 0.51 (0.42-0.63) and 0.54 (0.46-0.64) at 2 h. Ticagrelor plus aspirin and ticagrelor plus placebo decreased ß-TG by a GMR of 0.38 (0.26-0.57) and 0.47 (0.31-0.72). Ticagrelor plus aspirin and ticagrelor plus placebo reduced f1.2 by a GMR of 0.58 (0.45-0.75) and 0.55 (0.38-0.80); clopidogrel did not. Over 24 h, no difference in ß-TG occurred between clopidogrel plus aspirin and clopidogrel plus placebo (ΔAUC = -2.9 [-9.9 to 4.1]) or between ticagrelor plus aspirin and ticagrelor plus placebo (ΔAUC = -3.5 [-11.8 to 4.7]). No difference in f1.2 occurred between clopidogrel plus aspirin and clopidogrel plus placebo (ΔAUC = -4.2 [-10.2 to 1.8]) or between ticagrelor plus aspirin and ticagrelor plus placebo (ΔAUC = -3.6 [-10.9 to 3.7]). CONCLUSIONS: P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy and dual antiplatelet therapy inhibit hemostatic system activation to a comparable extent.

Mechanisms underlying acquired von Willebrand syndrome associated with an IgM paraprotein.

Acquired von Willebrand (vW) syndrome is a rare bleeding disorder which is frequently associated with immunological, malignant or cardiovascular disorders. The underlying pathomechanisms, particularly in patients with IgM monoclonal gammopathies, often remain unknown. We report a patient with indolent small B-cell lymphoma (immunocytoma) and plasmacytic differentiation with an IgM kappa paraprotein who was admitted with retroperitoneal haematoma. Medical history and coagulation testing were consistent with acquired vW syndrome. vW immunohistochemistry showed normal cytoplasmic labelling of endothelial cells and megakaryocytes, whereas the lymphomatous infiltrate was negative. Acquired vW syndrome due to adsorption of vW factor on malignant cells was thus excluded. In the multimeric analysis, all multimers were present similar to that in type 1 vW syndrome, but the triplet structures were blurred. The bands on serum immunofixation electrophoresis were also atypically broadened, which suggested complex formation between the IgM and vW factor. Immunoprecipitation studies showed that the 176-kDa proteolytic fragment of vW factor co-precipitated with the IgM paraprotein in the patient but not in the controls, suggesting a specific interaction between vW factor and the paraprotein in the patient. The patient required surgery and was successfully managed by chemotherapy consisting of rituximab and fludarabin as well as plasma exchange.

Thrombin generation in haemophilia A patients with factor VIII inhibitors after infusion of recombinant factor VIIa.

BACKGROUND: Development of factor VIII inhibitors is a serious complication in haemophilia A patients. Recombinant factor VIIa (rVIIa) is clinically effective, but its effects on haemostatic system need still to be fully elucidated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an open controlled study, we measured thrombin generation (peak thrombin) in venous blood and prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 (F1 + 2) and D-dimer in venous and in shed blood in five haemophilia A patients with inhibitors before and after rVIIa infusion. A total of five healthy individuals who did not receive rVIIa served as controls. RESULTS: At baseline, patients had lower mean (min-max) peak thrombin levels than controls [0.12 (0.0-0.6) vs. 186.9 (116.0-254.4) nM, P = 0.001]. After infusion, peak thrombin levels increased in average to 40.7 (28.3-51.6) nM, which translates into 80.2% (95% CI 65.4-88.6%) lower levels compared to that of controls. Mean (min-max) F1 + 2 levels in venous blood did not differ significantly between patients and controls [160.7 (89.8-331.3) vs. 160.8 (104.4-242.3) pmol L(-1)], but increased in average (min-max) by 39.4% (14.1-58.5%) after infusion. In blood emerging from incisions made to determine the bleeding (shed blood), F1 + 2 levels were lower in patients than controls [1383.3 (906.4-2044.6) vs. 2981.7 (1610.0-4539.6) pmol L(-1); P = 0.04], but were not affected by rVIIa; D-dimer levels were significantly higher in haemophiliacs than in controls and remained unchanged after infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Haemophilia A patients with factor VIII inhibitors have low thrombin generation. After rVIIa, the extent of coagulation activation as measured by levels of F1 + 2 is increased, but thrombin generation is restored to only 20%. Peak thrombin levels could reflect the effects of rVIIa on coagulation mechanisms, and their relevance with regard to the clinical coagulation defect of haemophilia A patients with factor VIII inhibitors might be evaluated.