ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is standard of care for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. This systemic review compared efficacy and safety of weekly vs triweekly cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS: Among 1500 prospective studies published from 1970 to 2015, 39 (18 weekly, 21 triweekly) including 3668 patients qualified for inclusion. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using weighted estimates and 2-tailed t test for comparisons; significance level was 0.05. RESULTS: Locoregional control was 58% (CI 53%-63%) vs 61% (CI 56%-65%; P = .7). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 74% (CI 66%-80%) for weekly vs 67% (64%-69%) triweekly groups (P = .67). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 69% (CI 59%-77%) for weekly vs 62% (CI 58%-65%) triweekly groups (P = .9). Grade 3 to 5 toxicities were 36% vs 40% (P = .37) in weekly vs triweekly groups. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly cisplatin was comparable in efficacy and safety to the triweekly regimen. Our analysis supports the use of weekly or triweekly cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, with tolerability being a key factor in selection.
Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Adult , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/mortality , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: There is a dearth of prospective evidence regarding cancer of the major salivary glands. Outcomes and management of major salivary gland are based largely on retrospective series spanning many decades and changes in surgical, radiation, imaging and systemic therapy strategies and technique. We sought to report contemporary patterns of relapse and prognostic factors for major salivary gland cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 112 patients with major salivary gland cancers underwent resection with or without adjuvant therapy between January 1997 and September 2010. Outcomes were documented with follow-up until December 2014. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed with locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC) and overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome variables. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 55.1 months. Rates of LRC for stage I/II and III/IV at five years were 95.7% and 61.9% respectively. Rates of DC at five years for stage I/II and III/IV were 93% and 56.9% respectively. Multivariate analysis identified larger tumor size, clinical nerve involvement and in parotid cancers, advanced T stage, no adjuvant radiation, and older age at diagnosis to be associated with increased risk of locoregional recurrence (all p<0.05). Distant metastasis was associated with sublingual site, degree of clinical nerve involvement, high grade, tumor size and in parotid tumors additionally deep lobe involvement on multivariate analysis (all p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Several prognostic factors were identified that may help guide decisions regarding adjuvant therapy. DM remains a significant concern in the management of this disease.
